Cargando…

One-year risk of serious infection in patients treated with certolizumab pegol as compared with other TNF inhibitors in a real-world setting: data from a national U.S. rheumatoid arthritis registry

BACKGROUND: Registry studies provide a valuable source of comparative safety data for tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but they are subject to channeling bias. Comparing safety outcomes without accounting for channeling bias can lead to inaccurate comparison...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harrold, Leslie R., Litman, Heather J., Saunders, Katherine C., Dandreo, Kimberly J., Gershenson, Bernice, Greenberg, Jeffrey D., Low, Robert, Stark, Jeffrey, Suruki, Robert, Jaganathan, Srihari, Kremer, Joel M., Yassine, Mohamed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29329557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1496-5
_version_ 1783297264106602496
author Harrold, Leslie R.
Litman, Heather J.
Saunders, Katherine C.
Dandreo, Kimberly J.
Gershenson, Bernice
Greenberg, Jeffrey D.
Low, Robert
Stark, Jeffrey
Suruki, Robert
Jaganathan, Srihari
Kremer, Joel M.
Yassine, Mohamed
author_facet Harrold, Leslie R.
Litman, Heather J.
Saunders, Katherine C.
Dandreo, Kimberly J.
Gershenson, Bernice
Greenberg, Jeffrey D.
Low, Robert
Stark, Jeffrey
Suruki, Robert
Jaganathan, Srihari
Kremer, Joel M.
Yassine, Mohamed
author_sort Harrold, Leslie R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Registry studies provide a valuable source of comparative safety data for tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but they are subject to channeling bias. Comparing safety outcomes without accounting for channeling bias can lead to inaccurate comparisons between TNFi prescribed at different stages of the disease. In the present study, we examined the incidence of serious infection and other adverse events during certolizumab pegol (CZP) use vs other TNFi in a U.S. RA cohort before and after using a methodological approach to minimize channeling bias. METHODS: Patients with RA enrolled in the Corrona registry, aged ≥ 18 years, initiating CZP or other TNFi (etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, or infliximab) after May 1, 2009 (n = 6215 initiations), were followed for ≤ 12 months. A propensity score (PS) model was used to control for baseline characteristics associated with the probability of receiving CZP vs other TNFi. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of serious infectious events (SIEs), malignancies, and cardiovascular events (CVEs) in the CZP group vs other TNFi group were calculated with 95% CIs, before and after PS matching. RESULTS: Patients were more likely to initiate CZP later in the course of therapy than those initiating other TNFi. CZP initiators (n = 975) were older and had longer disease duration, more active disease, and greater disability than other TNFi initiators (n = 5240). After PS matching, there were no clinically important differences between CZP (n = 952) and other TNFi (n = 952). Before PS matching, CZP was associated with a greater incidence of SIEs (IRR 1.53 [95% CI 1.13, 2.05]). The risk of SIEs was not different between groups after PS matching (IRR 1.26 [95% CI 0.84, 1.90]). The 95% CI of the IRRs for malignancies or CVEs included unity, regardless of PS matching, suggesting no difference in risk between CZP and other TNFi. CONCLUSIONS: After using PS matching to minimize channeling bias and compare patients with a similar likelihood of receiving CZP or other TNFi, the 1-year risk of SIEs, malignancies, and CVEs was not distinguishable between the two groups. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-017-1496-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5795286
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57952862018-02-12 One-year risk of serious infection in patients treated with certolizumab pegol as compared with other TNF inhibitors in a real-world setting: data from a national U.S. rheumatoid arthritis registry Harrold, Leslie R. Litman, Heather J. Saunders, Katherine C. Dandreo, Kimberly J. Gershenson, Bernice Greenberg, Jeffrey D. Low, Robert Stark, Jeffrey Suruki, Robert Jaganathan, Srihari Kremer, Joel M. Yassine, Mohamed Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: Registry studies provide a valuable source of comparative safety data for tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but they are subject to channeling bias. Comparing safety outcomes without accounting for channeling bias can lead to inaccurate comparisons between TNFi prescribed at different stages of the disease. In the present study, we examined the incidence of serious infection and other adverse events during certolizumab pegol (CZP) use vs other TNFi in a U.S. RA cohort before and after using a methodological approach to minimize channeling bias. METHODS: Patients with RA enrolled in the Corrona registry, aged ≥ 18 years, initiating CZP or other TNFi (etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, or infliximab) after May 1, 2009 (n = 6215 initiations), were followed for ≤ 12 months. A propensity score (PS) model was used to control for baseline characteristics associated with the probability of receiving CZP vs other TNFi. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of serious infectious events (SIEs), malignancies, and cardiovascular events (CVEs) in the CZP group vs other TNFi group were calculated with 95% CIs, before and after PS matching. RESULTS: Patients were more likely to initiate CZP later in the course of therapy than those initiating other TNFi. CZP initiators (n = 975) were older and had longer disease duration, more active disease, and greater disability than other TNFi initiators (n = 5240). After PS matching, there were no clinically important differences between CZP (n = 952) and other TNFi (n = 952). Before PS matching, CZP was associated with a greater incidence of SIEs (IRR 1.53 [95% CI 1.13, 2.05]). The risk of SIEs was not different between groups after PS matching (IRR 1.26 [95% CI 0.84, 1.90]). The 95% CI of the IRRs for malignancies or CVEs included unity, regardless of PS matching, suggesting no difference in risk between CZP and other TNFi. CONCLUSIONS: After using PS matching to minimize channeling bias and compare patients with a similar likelihood of receiving CZP or other TNFi, the 1-year risk of SIEs, malignancies, and CVEs was not distinguishable between the two groups. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-017-1496-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-01-02 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5795286/ /pubmed/29329557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1496-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Harrold, Leslie R.
Litman, Heather J.
Saunders, Katherine C.
Dandreo, Kimberly J.
Gershenson, Bernice
Greenberg, Jeffrey D.
Low, Robert
Stark, Jeffrey
Suruki, Robert
Jaganathan, Srihari
Kremer, Joel M.
Yassine, Mohamed
One-year risk of serious infection in patients treated with certolizumab pegol as compared with other TNF inhibitors in a real-world setting: data from a national U.S. rheumatoid arthritis registry
title One-year risk of serious infection in patients treated with certolizumab pegol as compared with other TNF inhibitors in a real-world setting: data from a national U.S. rheumatoid arthritis registry
title_full One-year risk of serious infection in patients treated with certolizumab pegol as compared with other TNF inhibitors in a real-world setting: data from a national U.S. rheumatoid arthritis registry
title_fullStr One-year risk of serious infection in patients treated with certolizumab pegol as compared with other TNF inhibitors in a real-world setting: data from a national U.S. rheumatoid arthritis registry
title_full_unstemmed One-year risk of serious infection in patients treated with certolizumab pegol as compared with other TNF inhibitors in a real-world setting: data from a national U.S. rheumatoid arthritis registry
title_short One-year risk of serious infection in patients treated with certolizumab pegol as compared with other TNF inhibitors in a real-world setting: data from a national U.S. rheumatoid arthritis registry
title_sort one-year risk of serious infection in patients treated with certolizumab pegol as compared with other tnf inhibitors in a real-world setting: data from a national u.s. rheumatoid arthritis registry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795286/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29329557
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-017-1496-5
work_keys_str_mv AT harroldleslier oneyearriskofseriousinfectioninpatientstreatedwithcertolizumabpegolascomparedwithothertnfinhibitorsinarealworldsettingdatafromanationalusrheumatoidarthritisregistry
AT litmanheatherj oneyearriskofseriousinfectioninpatientstreatedwithcertolizumabpegolascomparedwithothertnfinhibitorsinarealworldsettingdatafromanationalusrheumatoidarthritisregistry
AT saunderskatherinec oneyearriskofseriousinfectioninpatientstreatedwithcertolizumabpegolascomparedwithothertnfinhibitorsinarealworldsettingdatafromanationalusrheumatoidarthritisregistry
AT dandreokimberlyj oneyearriskofseriousinfectioninpatientstreatedwithcertolizumabpegolascomparedwithothertnfinhibitorsinarealworldsettingdatafromanationalusrheumatoidarthritisregistry
AT gershensonbernice oneyearriskofseriousinfectioninpatientstreatedwithcertolizumabpegolascomparedwithothertnfinhibitorsinarealworldsettingdatafromanationalusrheumatoidarthritisregistry
AT greenbergjeffreyd oneyearriskofseriousinfectioninpatientstreatedwithcertolizumabpegolascomparedwithothertnfinhibitorsinarealworldsettingdatafromanationalusrheumatoidarthritisregistry
AT lowrobert oneyearriskofseriousinfectioninpatientstreatedwithcertolizumabpegolascomparedwithothertnfinhibitorsinarealworldsettingdatafromanationalusrheumatoidarthritisregistry
AT starkjeffrey oneyearriskofseriousinfectioninpatientstreatedwithcertolizumabpegolascomparedwithothertnfinhibitorsinarealworldsettingdatafromanationalusrheumatoidarthritisregistry
AT surukirobert oneyearriskofseriousinfectioninpatientstreatedwithcertolizumabpegolascomparedwithothertnfinhibitorsinarealworldsettingdatafromanationalusrheumatoidarthritisregistry
AT jaganathansrihari oneyearriskofseriousinfectioninpatientstreatedwithcertolizumabpegolascomparedwithothertnfinhibitorsinarealworldsettingdatafromanationalusrheumatoidarthritisregistry
AT kremerjoelm oneyearriskofseriousinfectioninpatientstreatedwithcertolizumabpegolascomparedwithothertnfinhibitorsinarealworldsettingdatafromanationalusrheumatoidarthritisregistry
AT yassinemohamed oneyearriskofseriousinfectioninpatientstreatedwithcertolizumabpegolascomparedwithothertnfinhibitorsinarealworldsettingdatafromanationalusrheumatoidarthritisregistry