Cargando…
Comparison of SVM, RF and ELM on an Electronic Nose for the Intelligent Evaluation of Paraffin Samples
Paraffin odor intensity is an important quality indicator when a paraffin inspection is performed. Currently, paraffin odor level assessment is mainly dependent on an artificial sensory evaluation. In this paper, we developed a paraffin odor analysis system to classify and grade four kinds of paraff...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29346328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18010285 |
_version_ | 1783297309848633344 |
---|---|
author | Men, Hong Fu, Songlin Yang, Jialin Cheng, Meiqi Shi, Yan Liu, Jingjing |
author_facet | Men, Hong Fu, Songlin Yang, Jialin Cheng, Meiqi Shi, Yan Liu, Jingjing |
author_sort | Men, Hong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Paraffin odor intensity is an important quality indicator when a paraffin inspection is performed. Currently, paraffin odor level assessment is mainly dependent on an artificial sensory evaluation. In this paper, we developed a paraffin odor analysis system to classify and grade four kinds of paraffin samples. The original feature set was optimized using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Squares (PLS). Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) were applied to three different feature data sets for classification and level assessment of paraffin. For classification, the model based on SVM, with an accuracy rate of 100%, was superior to that based on RF, with an accuracy rate of 98.33–100%, and ELM, with an accuracy rate of 98.01–100%. For level assessment, the R(2) related to the training set was above 0.97 and the R(2) related to the test set was above 0.87. Through comprehensive comparison, the generalization of the model based on ELM was superior to those based on SVM and RF. The scoring errors for the three models were 0.0016–0.3494, lower than the error of 0.5–1.0 measured by industry standard experts, meaning these methods have a higher prediction accuracy for scoring paraffin level. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5795501 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57955012018-02-13 Comparison of SVM, RF and ELM on an Electronic Nose for the Intelligent Evaluation of Paraffin Samples Men, Hong Fu, Songlin Yang, Jialin Cheng, Meiqi Shi, Yan Liu, Jingjing Sensors (Basel) Article Paraffin odor intensity is an important quality indicator when a paraffin inspection is performed. Currently, paraffin odor level assessment is mainly dependent on an artificial sensory evaluation. In this paper, we developed a paraffin odor analysis system to classify and grade four kinds of paraffin samples. The original feature set was optimized using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Squares (PLS). Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) were applied to three different feature data sets for classification and level assessment of paraffin. For classification, the model based on SVM, with an accuracy rate of 100%, was superior to that based on RF, with an accuracy rate of 98.33–100%, and ELM, with an accuracy rate of 98.01–100%. For level assessment, the R(2) related to the training set was above 0.97 and the R(2) related to the test set was above 0.87. Through comprehensive comparison, the generalization of the model based on ELM was superior to those based on SVM and RF. The scoring errors for the three models were 0.0016–0.3494, lower than the error of 0.5–1.0 measured by industry standard experts, meaning these methods have a higher prediction accuracy for scoring paraffin level. MDPI 2018-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5795501/ /pubmed/29346328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18010285 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Men, Hong Fu, Songlin Yang, Jialin Cheng, Meiqi Shi, Yan Liu, Jingjing Comparison of SVM, RF and ELM on an Electronic Nose for the Intelligent Evaluation of Paraffin Samples |
title | Comparison of SVM, RF and ELM on an Electronic Nose for the Intelligent Evaluation of Paraffin Samples |
title_full | Comparison of SVM, RF and ELM on an Electronic Nose for the Intelligent Evaluation of Paraffin Samples |
title_fullStr | Comparison of SVM, RF and ELM on an Electronic Nose for the Intelligent Evaluation of Paraffin Samples |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of SVM, RF and ELM on an Electronic Nose for the Intelligent Evaluation of Paraffin Samples |
title_short | Comparison of SVM, RF and ELM on an Electronic Nose for the Intelligent Evaluation of Paraffin Samples |
title_sort | comparison of svm, rf and elm on an electronic nose for the intelligent evaluation of paraffin samples |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795501/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29346328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18010285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT menhong comparisonofsvmrfandelmonanelectronicnosefortheintelligentevaluationofparaffinsamples AT fusonglin comparisonofsvmrfandelmonanelectronicnosefortheintelligentevaluationofparaffinsamples AT yangjialin comparisonofsvmrfandelmonanelectronicnosefortheintelligentevaluationofparaffinsamples AT chengmeiqi comparisonofsvmrfandelmonanelectronicnosefortheintelligentevaluationofparaffinsamples AT shiyan comparisonofsvmrfandelmonanelectronicnosefortheintelligentevaluationofparaffinsamples AT liujingjing comparisonofsvmrfandelmonanelectronicnosefortheintelligentevaluationofparaffinsamples |