Cargando…

Comparison of SVM, RF and ELM on an Electronic Nose for the Intelligent Evaluation of Paraffin Samples

Paraffin odor intensity is an important quality indicator when a paraffin inspection is performed. Currently, paraffin odor level assessment is mainly dependent on an artificial sensory evaluation. In this paper, we developed a paraffin odor analysis system to classify and grade four kinds of paraff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Men, Hong, Fu, Songlin, Yang, Jialin, Cheng, Meiqi, Shi, Yan, Liu, Jingjing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29346328
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18010285
_version_ 1783297309848633344
author Men, Hong
Fu, Songlin
Yang, Jialin
Cheng, Meiqi
Shi, Yan
Liu, Jingjing
author_facet Men, Hong
Fu, Songlin
Yang, Jialin
Cheng, Meiqi
Shi, Yan
Liu, Jingjing
author_sort Men, Hong
collection PubMed
description Paraffin odor intensity is an important quality indicator when a paraffin inspection is performed. Currently, paraffin odor level assessment is mainly dependent on an artificial sensory evaluation. In this paper, we developed a paraffin odor analysis system to classify and grade four kinds of paraffin samples. The original feature set was optimized using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Squares (PLS). Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) were applied to three different feature data sets for classification and level assessment of paraffin. For classification, the model based on SVM, with an accuracy rate of 100%, was superior to that based on RF, with an accuracy rate of 98.33–100%, and ELM, with an accuracy rate of 98.01–100%. For level assessment, the R(2) related to the training set was above 0.97 and the R(2) related to the test set was above 0.87. Through comprehensive comparison, the generalization of the model based on ELM was superior to those based on SVM and RF. The scoring errors for the three models were 0.0016–0.3494, lower than the error of 0.5–1.0 measured by industry standard experts, meaning these methods have a higher prediction accuracy for scoring paraffin level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5795501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57955012018-02-13 Comparison of SVM, RF and ELM on an Electronic Nose for the Intelligent Evaluation of Paraffin Samples Men, Hong Fu, Songlin Yang, Jialin Cheng, Meiqi Shi, Yan Liu, Jingjing Sensors (Basel) Article Paraffin odor intensity is an important quality indicator when a paraffin inspection is performed. Currently, paraffin odor level assessment is mainly dependent on an artificial sensory evaluation. In this paper, we developed a paraffin odor analysis system to classify and grade four kinds of paraffin samples. The original feature set was optimized using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Squares (PLS). Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) were applied to three different feature data sets for classification and level assessment of paraffin. For classification, the model based on SVM, with an accuracy rate of 100%, was superior to that based on RF, with an accuracy rate of 98.33–100%, and ELM, with an accuracy rate of 98.01–100%. For level assessment, the R(2) related to the training set was above 0.97 and the R(2) related to the test set was above 0.87. Through comprehensive comparison, the generalization of the model based on ELM was superior to those based on SVM and RF. The scoring errors for the three models were 0.0016–0.3494, lower than the error of 0.5–1.0 measured by industry standard experts, meaning these methods have a higher prediction accuracy for scoring paraffin level. MDPI 2018-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5795501/ /pubmed/29346328 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18010285 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Men, Hong
Fu, Songlin
Yang, Jialin
Cheng, Meiqi
Shi, Yan
Liu, Jingjing
Comparison of SVM, RF and ELM on an Electronic Nose for the Intelligent Evaluation of Paraffin Samples
title Comparison of SVM, RF and ELM on an Electronic Nose for the Intelligent Evaluation of Paraffin Samples
title_full Comparison of SVM, RF and ELM on an Electronic Nose for the Intelligent Evaluation of Paraffin Samples
title_fullStr Comparison of SVM, RF and ELM on an Electronic Nose for the Intelligent Evaluation of Paraffin Samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of SVM, RF and ELM on an Electronic Nose for the Intelligent Evaluation of Paraffin Samples
title_short Comparison of SVM, RF and ELM on an Electronic Nose for the Intelligent Evaluation of Paraffin Samples
title_sort comparison of svm, rf and elm on an electronic nose for the intelligent evaluation of paraffin samples
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29346328
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18010285
work_keys_str_mv AT menhong comparisonofsvmrfandelmonanelectronicnosefortheintelligentevaluationofparaffinsamples
AT fusonglin comparisonofsvmrfandelmonanelectronicnosefortheintelligentevaluationofparaffinsamples
AT yangjialin comparisonofsvmrfandelmonanelectronicnosefortheintelligentevaluationofparaffinsamples
AT chengmeiqi comparisonofsvmrfandelmonanelectronicnosefortheintelligentevaluationofparaffinsamples
AT shiyan comparisonofsvmrfandelmonanelectronicnosefortheintelligentevaluationofparaffinsamples
AT liujingjing comparisonofsvmrfandelmonanelectronicnosefortheintelligentevaluationofparaffinsamples