Cargando…
A Review of Oil Spill Remote Sensing
The technical aspects of oil spill remote sensing are examined and the practical uses and drawbacks of each technology are given with a focus on unfolding technology. The use of visible techniques is ubiquitous, but limited to certain observational conditions and simple applications. Infrared camera...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29301212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18010091 |
_version_ | 1783297315220488192 |
---|---|
author | Fingas, Merv Brown, Carl E. |
author_facet | Fingas, Merv Brown, Carl E. |
author_sort | Fingas, Merv |
collection | PubMed |
description | The technical aspects of oil spill remote sensing are examined and the practical uses and drawbacks of each technology are given with a focus on unfolding technology. The use of visible techniques is ubiquitous, but limited to certain observational conditions and simple applications. Infrared cameras offer some potential as oil spill sensors but have several limitations. Both techniques, although limited in capability, are widely used because of their increasing economy. The laser fluorosensor uniquely detects oil on substrates that include shoreline, water, soil, plants, ice, and snow. New commercial units have come out in the last few years. Radar detects calm areas on water and thus oil on water, because oil will reduce capillary waves on a water surface given moderate winds. Radar provides a unique option for wide area surveillance, all day or night and rainy/cloudy weather. Satellite-carried radars with their frequent overpass and high spatial resolution make these day–night and all-weather sensors essential for delineating both large spills and monitoring ship and platform oil discharges. Most strategic oil spill mapping is now being carried out using radar. Slick thickness measurements have been sought for many years. The operative technique at this time is the passive microwave. New techniques for calibration and verification have made these instruments more reliable. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5795530 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57955302018-02-13 A Review of Oil Spill Remote Sensing Fingas, Merv Brown, Carl E. Sensors (Basel) Review The technical aspects of oil spill remote sensing are examined and the practical uses and drawbacks of each technology are given with a focus on unfolding technology. The use of visible techniques is ubiquitous, but limited to certain observational conditions and simple applications. Infrared cameras offer some potential as oil spill sensors but have several limitations. Both techniques, although limited in capability, are widely used because of their increasing economy. The laser fluorosensor uniquely detects oil on substrates that include shoreline, water, soil, plants, ice, and snow. New commercial units have come out in the last few years. Radar detects calm areas on water and thus oil on water, because oil will reduce capillary waves on a water surface given moderate winds. Radar provides a unique option for wide area surveillance, all day or night and rainy/cloudy weather. Satellite-carried radars with their frequent overpass and high spatial resolution make these day–night and all-weather sensors essential for delineating both large spills and monitoring ship and platform oil discharges. Most strategic oil spill mapping is now being carried out using radar. Slick thickness measurements have been sought for many years. The operative technique at this time is the passive microwave. New techniques for calibration and verification have made these instruments more reliable. MDPI 2017-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5795530/ /pubmed/29301212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18010091 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Fingas, Merv Brown, Carl E. A Review of Oil Spill Remote Sensing |
title | A Review of Oil Spill Remote Sensing |
title_full | A Review of Oil Spill Remote Sensing |
title_fullStr | A Review of Oil Spill Remote Sensing |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review of Oil Spill Remote Sensing |
title_short | A Review of Oil Spill Remote Sensing |
title_sort | review of oil spill remote sensing |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795530/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29301212 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18010091 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fingasmerv areviewofoilspillremotesensing AT browncarle areviewofoilspillremotesensing AT fingasmerv reviewofoilspillremotesensing AT browncarle reviewofoilspillremotesensing |