Cargando…

Comparison of mono- and combination antibiotic therapy for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia: A cumulative meta-analysis of cohort studies

It is currently unknown whether antibiotic monotherapy or combination therapy is a more effective treatment for patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia. The present study consists of a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies in associated studies. The treatment options of mono...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tang, Su Yu, Zhang, Shun Wen, Wu, Jiang Dong, Wu, Fang, Zhang, Jie, Dong, Jiang Tao, Guo, Peng, Zhang, Da Long, Yang, Jun Ting, Zhang, Wan Jiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29456647
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.5727
_version_ 1783297323829297152
author Tang, Su Yu
Zhang, Shun Wen
Wu, Jiang Dong
Wu, Fang
Zhang, Jie
Dong, Jiang Tao
Guo, Peng
Zhang, Da Long
Yang, Jun Ting
Zhang, Wan Jiang
author_facet Tang, Su Yu
Zhang, Shun Wen
Wu, Jiang Dong
Wu, Fang
Zhang, Jie
Dong, Jiang Tao
Guo, Peng
Zhang, Da Long
Yang, Jun Ting
Zhang, Wan Jiang
author_sort Tang, Su Yu
collection PubMed
description It is currently unknown whether antibiotic monotherapy or combination therapy is a more effective treatment for patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia. The present study consists of a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies in associated studies. The treatment options of monotherapy and combination therapy have been compared, to determine which is more effective against P. aeruginosa bacteraemia. Several electronic bibliographic databases were systematically searched and clinical studies that compared combination therapy with monotherapy for P. aeruginosa bacteraemia were identified. Dersimonian and Laird's random-effects models were used to generate summary estimates of the effects and to assess their association according to different patient characteristics and research quality standards. A total of 17 studies were selected, 3 of which were prospective while the remaining 14 were retrospective. The studies involved a total of 2,504 patients. Significant differences between combination therapy and monotherapy treatment were not found when the data were combined (odds ratio (OR)=0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.61–1.08; P=0.035). The results demonstrated strength in a number of stratification and sensitivity analyses. The variables used included study type, treatment quality score and survival rate of subgroup analysis. To conduct cumulative meta-analysis, the number of years and samples were calculated. The OR value and 95% CI were stable and demonstrated good change trend. According to the size of the sample order following accumulation, OR values and 95% CI (0.89, 0.76–1.04) exhibited a narrow range. Neither combination therapy or monotherapy exhibited significant effects on the mortality of patients with P. aeruginosa bacteraemia. Future research is required and should include large, well-designed prospective cohorts, and grouped clinical studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5795571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57955712018-02-16 Comparison of mono- and combination antibiotic therapy for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia: A cumulative meta-analysis of cohort studies Tang, Su Yu Zhang, Shun Wen Wu, Jiang Dong Wu, Fang Zhang, Jie Dong, Jiang Tao Guo, Peng Zhang, Da Long Yang, Jun Ting Zhang, Wan Jiang Exp Ther Med Articles It is currently unknown whether antibiotic monotherapy or combination therapy is a more effective treatment for patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia. The present study consists of a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies in associated studies. The treatment options of monotherapy and combination therapy have been compared, to determine which is more effective against P. aeruginosa bacteraemia. Several electronic bibliographic databases were systematically searched and clinical studies that compared combination therapy with monotherapy for P. aeruginosa bacteraemia were identified. Dersimonian and Laird's random-effects models were used to generate summary estimates of the effects and to assess their association according to different patient characteristics and research quality standards. A total of 17 studies were selected, 3 of which were prospective while the remaining 14 were retrospective. The studies involved a total of 2,504 patients. Significant differences between combination therapy and monotherapy treatment were not found when the data were combined (odds ratio (OR)=0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.61–1.08; P=0.035). The results demonstrated strength in a number of stratification and sensitivity analyses. The variables used included study type, treatment quality score and survival rate of subgroup analysis. To conduct cumulative meta-analysis, the number of years and samples were calculated. The OR value and 95% CI were stable and demonstrated good change trend. According to the size of the sample order following accumulation, OR values and 95% CI (0.89, 0.76–1.04) exhibited a narrow range. Neither combination therapy or monotherapy exhibited significant effects on the mortality of patients with P. aeruginosa bacteraemia. Future research is required and should include large, well-designed prospective cohorts, and grouped clinical studies. D.A. Spandidos 2018-03 2018-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5795571/ /pubmed/29456647 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.5727 Text en Copyright: © Tang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Tang, Su Yu
Zhang, Shun Wen
Wu, Jiang Dong
Wu, Fang
Zhang, Jie
Dong, Jiang Tao
Guo, Peng
Zhang, Da Long
Yang, Jun Ting
Zhang, Wan Jiang
Comparison of mono- and combination antibiotic therapy for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia: A cumulative meta-analysis of cohort studies
title Comparison of mono- and combination antibiotic therapy for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia: A cumulative meta-analysis of cohort studies
title_full Comparison of mono- and combination antibiotic therapy for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia: A cumulative meta-analysis of cohort studies
title_fullStr Comparison of mono- and combination antibiotic therapy for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia: A cumulative meta-analysis of cohort studies
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of mono- and combination antibiotic therapy for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia: A cumulative meta-analysis of cohort studies
title_short Comparison of mono- and combination antibiotic therapy for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia: A cumulative meta-analysis of cohort studies
title_sort comparison of mono- and combination antibiotic therapy for the treatment of pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteraemia: a cumulative meta-analysis of cohort studies
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29456647
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2018.5727
work_keys_str_mv AT tangsuyu comparisonofmonoandcombinationantibiotictherapyforthetreatmentofpseudomonasaeruginosabacteraemiaacumulativemetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT zhangshunwen comparisonofmonoandcombinationantibiotictherapyforthetreatmentofpseudomonasaeruginosabacteraemiaacumulativemetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT wujiangdong comparisonofmonoandcombinationantibiotictherapyforthetreatmentofpseudomonasaeruginosabacteraemiaacumulativemetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT wufang comparisonofmonoandcombinationantibiotictherapyforthetreatmentofpseudomonasaeruginosabacteraemiaacumulativemetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT zhangjie comparisonofmonoandcombinationantibiotictherapyforthetreatmentofpseudomonasaeruginosabacteraemiaacumulativemetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT dongjiangtao comparisonofmonoandcombinationantibiotictherapyforthetreatmentofpseudomonasaeruginosabacteraemiaacumulativemetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT guopeng comparisonofmonoandcombinationantibiotictherapyforthetreatmentofpseudomonasaeruginosabacteraemiaacumulativemetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT zhangdalong comparisonofmonoandcombinationantibiotictherapyforthetreatmentofpseudomonasaeruginosabacteraemiaacumulativemetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT yangjunting comparisonofmonoandcombinationantibiotictherapyforthetreatmentofpseudomonasaeruginosabacteraemiaacumulativemetaanalysisofcohortstudies
AT zhangwanjiang comparisonofmonoandcombinationantibiotictherapyforthetreatmentofpseudomonasaeruginosabacteraemiaacumulativemetaanalysisofcohortstudies