Cargando…
How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey
Background: In 2014, the ‘Smarter Medicine’ campaign released a top five list of unnecessary tests and treatments in Swiss primary care, such as imaging for acute low-back pain and long-term prescribing of proton pump inhibitors. Objectives: Measure general practitioners’ (GPs) agreement with the re...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29168409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1395018 |
_version_ | 1783297354789552128 |
---|---|
author | Selby, Kevin Cornuz, Jacques Cohidon, Christine Gaspoz, Jean-Michel Senn, Nicolas |
author_facet | Selby, Kevin Cornuz, Jacques Cohidon, Christine Gaspoz, Jean-Michel Senn, Nicolas |
author_sort | Selby, Kevin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: In 2014, the ‘Smarter Medicine’ campaign released a top five list of unnecessary tests and treatments in Swiss primary care, such as imaging for acute low-back pain and long-term prescribing of proton pump inhibitors. Objectives: Measure general practitioners’ (GPs) agreement with the recommendations and self-reported adherence. Methods: Cross-sectional, online survey of GPs in the ‘Swiss primary care active monitoring’ (SPAM) network, which assessed awareness of ‘Smarter Medicine’ and views on each recommendation. Questions included whether the clinical situation is common, whether the recommendation is followed, whether GPs agree with the recommendation and reasons why the recommendation would not be followed. Results: One-hundred-and-sixty-seven of 277 GPs from the SPAM network participated (60%), of which 104 (62%) knew of ‘Smarter Medicine’, including 79% in German areas, 49% in French areas and 38% in Italian areas (P < 0.001). Agreement with the five recommendations was high, with scores around nine out of 10. The proportion saying they typically follow each recommendation was 68 to 74%, except not continuing long-term PPI prescriptions without attempting dose reduction, with only 34%. Common reasons for not following the recommendations were patient or other provider requests and situations that might suggest the need for more aggressive care. Conclusion: Two years after the launch of the campaign, awareness and acceptance of ‘Smarter Medicine’ appear to be high among Swiss GPs. By self-report, the recommendations are adhered to by most of the respondents but there may be room for improvement, especially for long-term PPI prescriptions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5795744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57957442018-02-28 How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey Selby, Kevin Cornuz, Jacques Cohidon, Christine Gaspoz, Jean-Michel Senn, Nicolas Eur J Gen Pract Original Article Background: In 2014, the ‘Smarter Medicine’ campaign released a top five list of unnecessary tests and treatments in Swiss primary care, such as imaging for acute low-back pain and long-term prescribing of proton pump inhibitors. Objectives: Measure general practitioners’ (GPs) agreement with the recommendations and self-reported adherence. Methods: Cross-sectional, online survey of GPs in the ‘Swiss primary care active monitoring’ (SPAM) network, which assessed awareness of ‘Smarter Medicine’ and views on each recommendation. Questions included whether the clinical situation is common, whether the recommendation is followed, whether GPs agree with the recommendation and reasons why the recommendation would not be followed. Results: One-hundred-and-sixty-seven of 277 GPs from the SPAM network participated (60%), of which 104 (62%) knew of ‘Smarter Medicine’, including 79% in German areas, 49% in French areas and 38% in Italian areas (P < 0.001). Agreement with the five recommendations was high, with scores around nine out of 10. The proportion saying they typically follow each recommendation was 68 to 74%, except not continuing long-term PPI prescriptions without attempting dose reduction, with only 34%. Common reasons for not following the recommendations were patient or other provider requests and situations that might suggest the need for more aggressive care. Conclusion: Two years after the launch of the campaign, awareness and acceptance of ‘Smarter Medicine’ appear to be high among Swiss GPs. By self-report, the recommendations are adhered to by most of the respondents but there may be room for improvement, especially for long-term PPI prescriptions. Taylor & Francis 2017-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5795744/ /pubmed/29168409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1395018 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Selby, Kevin Cornuz, Jacques Cohidon, Christine Gaspoz, Jean-Michel Senn, Nicolas How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey |
title | How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey |
title_full | How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey |
title_fullStr | How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey |
title_full_unstemmed | How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey |
title_short | How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey |
title_sort | how do swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? results of a cross-sectional survey |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29168409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1395018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT selbykevin howdoswissgeneralpractitionersagreewithandreportadheringtoatopfivelistofunnecessarytestsandtreatmentsresultsofacrosssectionalsurvey AT cornuzjacques howdoswissgeneralpractitionersagreewithandreportadheringtoatopfivelistofunnecessarytestsandtreatmentsresultsofacrosssectionalsurvey AT cohidonchristine howdoswissgeneralpractitionersagreewithandreportadheringtoatopfivelistofunnecessarytestsandtreatmentsresultsofacrosssectionalsurvey AT gaspozjeanmichel howdoswissgeneralpractitionersagreewithandreportadheringtoatopfivelistofunnecessarytestsandtreatmentsresultsofacrosssectionalsurvey AT sennnicolas howdoswissgeneralpractitionersagreewithandreportadheringtoatopfivelistofunnecessarytestsandtreatmentsresultsofacrosssectionalsurvey |