Cargando…

How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey

Background: In 2014, the ‘Smarter Medicine’ campaign released a top five list of unnecessary tests and treatments in Swiss primary care, such as imaging for acute low-back pain and long-term prescribing of proton pump inhibitors. Objectives: Measure general practitioners’ (GPs) agreement with the re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Selby, Kevin, Cornuz, Jacques, Cohidon, Christine, Gaspoz, Jean-Michel, Senn, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29168409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1395018
_version_ 1783297354789552128
author Selby, Kevin
Cornuz, Jacques
Cohidon, Christine
Gaspoz, Jean-Michel
Senn, Nicolas
author_facet Selby, Kevin
Cornuz, Jacques
Cohidon, Christine
Gaspoz, Jean-Michel
Senn, Nicolas
author_sort Selby, Kevin
collection PubMed
description Background: In 2014, the ‘Smarter Medicine’ campaign released a top five list of unnecessary tests and treatments in Swiss primary care, such as imaging for acute low-back pain and long-term prescribing of proton pump inhibitors. Objectives: Measure general practitioners’ (GPs) agreement with the recommendations and self-reported adherence. Methods: Cross-sectional, online survey of GPs in the ‘Swiss primary care active monitoring’ (SPAM) network, which assessed awareness of ‘Smarter Medicine’ and views on each recommendation. Questions included whether the clinical situation is common, whether the recommendation is followed, whether GPs agree with the recommendation and reasons why the recommendation would not be followed. Results: One-hundred-and-sixty-seven of 277 GPs from the SPAM network participated (60%), of which 104 (62%) knew of ‘Smarter Medicine’, including 79% in German areas, 49% in French areas and 38% in Italian areas (P < 0.001). Agreement with the five recommendations was high, with scores around nine out of 10. The proportion saying they typically follow each recommendation was 68 to 74%, except not continuing long-term PPI prescriptions without attempting dose reduction, with only 34%. Common reasons for not following the recommendations were patient or other provider requests and situations that might suggest the need for more aggressive care. Conclusion: Two years after the launch of the campaign, awareness and acceptance of ‘Smarter Medicine’ appear to be high among Swiss GPs. By self-report, the recommendations are adhered to by most of the respondents but there may be room for improvement, especially for long-term PPI prescriptions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5795744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57957442018-02-28 How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey Selby, Kevin Cornuz, Jacques Cohidon, Christine Gaspoz, Jean-Michel Senn, Nicolas Eur J Gen Pract Original Article Background: In 2014, the ‘Smarter Medicine’ campaign released a top five list of unnecessary tests and treatments in Swiss primary care, such as imaging for acute low-back pain and long-term prescribing of proton pump inhibitors. Objectives: Measure general practitioners’ (GPs) agreement with the recommendations and self-reported adherence. Methods: Cross-sectional, online survey of GPs in the ‘Swiss primary care active monitoring’ (SPAM) network, which assessed awareness of ‘Smarter Medicine’ and views on each recommendation. Questions included whether the clinical situation is common, whether the recommendation is followed, whether GPs agree with the recommendation and reasons why the recommendation would not be followed. Results: One-hundred-and-sixty-seven of 277 GPs from the SPAM network participated (60%), of which 104 (62%) knew of ‘Smarter Medicine’, including 79% in German areas, 49% in French areas and 38% in Italian areas (P < 0.001). Agreement with the five recommendations was high, with scores around nine out of 10. The proportion saying they typically follow each recommendation was 68 to 74%, except not continuing long-term PPI prescriptions without attempting dose reduction, with only 34%. Common reasons for not following the recommendations were patient or other provider requests and situations that might suggest the need for more aggressive care. Conclusion: Two years after the launch of the campaign, awareness and acceptance of ‘Smarter Medicine’ appear to be high among Swiss GPs. By self-report, the recommendations are adhered to by most of the respondents but there may be room for improvement, especially for long-term PPI prescriptions. Taylor & Francis 2017-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5795744/ /pubmed/29168409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1395018 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Selby, Kevin
Cornuz, Jacques
Cohidon, Christine
Gaspoz, Jean-Michel
Senn, Nicolas
How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey
title How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey
title_full How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey
title_short How do Swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? Results of a cross-sectional survey
title_sort how do swiss general practitioners agree with and report adhering to a top-five list of unnecessary tests and treatments? results of a cross-sectional survey
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29168409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1395018
work_keys_str_mv AT selbykevin howdoswissgeneralpractitionersagreewithandreportadheringtoatopfivelistofunnecessarytestsandtreatmentsresultsofacrosssectionalsurvey
AT cornuzjacques howdoswissgeneralpractitionersagreewithandreportadheringtoatopfivelistofunnecessarytestsandtreatmentsresultsofacrosssectionalsurvey
AT cohidonchristine howdoswissgeneralpractitionersagreewithandreportadheringtoatopfivelistofunnecessarytestsandtreatmentsresultsofacrosssectionalsurvey
AT gaspozjeanmichel howdoswissgeneralpractitionersagreewithandreportadheringtoatopfivelistofunnecessarytestsandtreatmentsresultsofacrosssectionalsurvey
AT sennnicolas howdoswissgeneralpractitionersagreewithandreportadheringtoatopfivelistofunnecessarytestsandtreatmentsresultsofacrosssectionalsurvey