Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of Different Platelet Lysates and Platelet Rich Preparations to Stimulate Tendon Cell Biology: An In Vitro Study
The poor healing potential of tendons is still a clinical problem, and the use of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) was hypothesized to stimulate healing. As the efficacy of PRPs remains unproven, platelet lysate (PL) could be an alternative with its main advantages of storage and characterization before u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5796161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29320421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010212 |
_version_ | 1783297447278149632 |
---|---|
author | Klatte-Schulz, Franka Schmidt, Tanja Uckert, Melanie Scheffler, Sven Kalus, Ulrich Rojewski, Markus Schrezenmeier, Hubert Pruss, Axel Wildemann, Britt |
author_facet | Klatte-Schulz, Franka Schmidt, Tanja Uckert, Melanie Scheffler, Sven Kalus, Ulrich Rojewski, Markus Schrezenmeier, Hubert Pruss, Axel Wildemann, Britt |
author_sort | Klatte-Schulz, Franka |
collection | PubMed |
description | The poor healing potential of tendons is still a clinical problem, and the use of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) was hypothesized to stimulate healing. As the efficacy of PRPs remains unproven, platelet lysate (PL) could be an alternative with its main advantages of storage and characterization before use. Five different blood products were prepared from 16 male donors: human serum, two PRPs (Arthrex, (PRP-ACP); RegenLab (PRP-BCT)), platelet concentrate (apheresis, PC), and PL (freezing-thawing destruction of PC). Additionally, ten commercial allogenic PLs (AlloPL) from pooled donors were tested. The highest concentration of most growth factors was found in AlloPL, whereas the release of growth factors lasted longer in the other products. PRP-ACP, PRP-BCT, and PC significantly increased cell viability of human tenocyte-like cells, whereas PC and AlloPL increased Col1A1 expression and PRP-BCT increased Col3A1 expression. MMP-1, IL-1β, and HGF expression was significantly increased and Scleraxis expression decreased by most blood products. COX1 expression significantly decreased by PC and AlloPL. No clear positive effects on tendon cell biology could be shown, which might partially explain the weak outcome results in clinical practice. Pooled PL seemed to have the most beneficial effects and might be the future in using blood products for tendon tissue regeneration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5796161 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57961612018-02-09 Comparative Analysis of Different Platelet Lysates and Platelet Rich Preparations to Stimulate Tendon Cell Biology: An In Vitro Study Klatte-Schulz, Franka Schmidt, Tanja Uckert, Melanie Scheffler, Sven Kalus, Ulrich Rojewski, Markus Schrezenmeier, Hubert Pruss, Axel Wildemann, Britt Int J Mol Sci Article The poor healing potential of tendons is still a clinical problem, and the use of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) was hypothesized to stimulate healing. As the efficacy of PRPs remains unproven, platelet lysate (PL) could be an alternative with its main advantages of storage and characterization before use. Five different blood products were prepared from 16 male donors: human serum, two PRPs (Arthrex, (PRP-ACP); RegenLab (PRP-BCT)), platelet concentrate (apheresis, PC), and PL (freezing-thawing destruction of PC). Additionally, ten commercial allogenic PLs (AlloPL) from pooled donors were tested. The highest concentration of most growth factors was found in AlloPL, whereas the release of growth factors lasted longer in the other products. PRP-ACP, PRP-BCT, and PC significantly increased cell viability of human tenocyte-like cells, whereas PC and AlloPL increased Col1A1 expression and PRP-BCT increased Col3A1 expression. MMP-1, IL-1β, and HGF expression was significantly increased and Scleraxis expression decreased by most blood products. COX1 expression significantly decreased by PC and AlloPL. No clear positive effects on tendon cell biology could be shown, which might partially explain the weak outcome results in clinical practice. Pooled PL seemed to have the most beneficial effects and might be the future in using blood products for tendon tissue regeneration. MDPI 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5796161/ /pubmed/29320421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010212 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Klatte-Schulz, Franka Schmidt, Tanja Uckert, Melanie Scheffler, Sven Kalus, Ulrich Rojewski, Markus Schrezenmeier, Hubert Pruss, Axel Wildemann, Britt Comparative Analysis of Different Platelet Lysates and Platelet Rich Preparations to Stimulate Tendon Cell Biology: An In Vitro Study |
title | Comparative Analysis of Different Platelet Lysates and Platelet Rich Preparations to Stimulate Tendon Cell Biology: An In Vitro Study |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Different Platelet Lysates and Platelet Rich Preparations to Stimulate Tendon Cell Biology: An In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Different Platelet Lysates and Platelet Rich Preparations to Stimulate Tendon Cell Biology: An In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Different Platelet Lysates and Platelet Rich Preparations to Stimulate Tendon Cell Biology: An In Vitro Study |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Different Platelet Lysates and Platelet Rich Preparations to Stimulate Tendon Cell Biology: An In Vitro Study |
title_sort | comparative analysis of different platelet lysates and platelet rich preparations to stimulate tendon cell biology: an in vitro study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5796161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29320421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010212 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klatteschulzfranka comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy AT schmidttanja comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy AT uckertmelanie comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy AT schefflersven comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy AT kalusulrich comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy AT rojewskimarkus comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy AT schrezenmeierhubert comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy AT prussaxel comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy AT wildemannbritt comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy |