Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Different Platelet Lysates and Platelet Rich Preparations to Stimulate Tendon Cell Biology: An In Vitro Study

The poor healing potential of tendons is still a clinical problem, and the use of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) was hypothesized to stimulate healing. As the efficacy of PRPs remains unproven, platelet lysate (PL) could be an alternative with its main advantages of storage and characterization before u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klatte-Schulz, Franka, Schmidt, Tanja, Uckert, Melanie, Scheffler, Sven, Kalus, Ulrich, Rojewski, Markus, Schrezenmeier, Hubert, Pruss, Axel, Wildemann, Britt
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5796161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29320421
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010212
_version_ 1783297447278149632
author Klatte-Schulz, Franka
Schmidt, Tanja
Uckert, Melanie
Scheffler, Sven
Kalus, Ulrich
Rojewski, Markus
Schrezenmeier, Hubert
Pruss, Axel
Wildemann, Britt
author_facet Klatte-Schulz, Franka
Schmidt, Tanja
Uckert, Melanie
Scheffler, Sven
Kalus, Ulrich
Rojewski, Markus
Schrezenmeier, Hubert
Pruss, Axel
Wildemann, Britt
author_sort Klatte-Schulz, Franka
collection PubMed
description The poor healing potential of tendons is still a clinical problem, and the use of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) was hypothesized to stimulate healing. As the efficacy of PRPs remains unproven, platelet lysate (PL) could be an alternative with its main advantages of storage and characterization before use. Five different blood products were prepared from 16 male donors: human serum, two PRPs (Arthrex, (PRP-ACP); RegenLab (PRP-BCT)), platelet concentrate (apheresis, PC), and PL (freezing-thawing destruction of PC). Additionally, ten commercial allogenic PLs (AlloPL) from pooled donors were tested. The highest concentration of most growth factors was found in AlloPL, whereas the release of growth factors lasted longer in the other products. PRP-ACP, PRP-BCT, and PC significantly increased cell viability of human tenocyte-like cells, whereas PC and AlloPL increased Col1A1 expression and PRP-BCT increased Col3A1 expression. MMP-1, IL-1β, and HGF expression was significantly increased and Scleraxis expression decreased by most blood products. COX1 expression significantly decreased by PC and AlloPL. No clear positive effects on tendon cell biology could be shown, which might partially explain the weak outcome results in clinical practice. Pooled PL seemed to have the most beneficial effects and might be the future in using blood products for tendon tissue regeneration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5796161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57961612018-02-09 Comparative Analysis of Different Platelet Lysates and Platelet Rich Preparations to Stimulate Tendon Cell Biology: An In Vitro Study Klatte-Schulz, Franka Schmidt, Tanja Uckert, Melanie Scheffler, Sven Kalus, Ulrich Rojewski, Markus Schrezenmeier, Hubert Pruss, Axel Wildemann, Britt Int J Mol Sci Article The poor healing potential of tendons is still a clinical problem, and the use of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) was hypothesized to stimulate healing. As the efficacy of PRPs remains unproven, platelet lysate (PL) could be an alternative with its main advantages of storage and characterization before use. Five different blood products were prepared from 16 male donors: human serum, two PRPs (Arthrex, (PRP-ACP); RegenLab (PRP-BCT)), platelet concentrate (apheresis, PC), and PL (freezing-thawing destruction of PC). Additionally, ten commercial allogenic PLs (AlloPL) from pooled donors were tested. The highest concentration of most growth factors was found in AlloPL, whereas the release of growth factors lasted longer in the other products. PRP-ACP, PRP-BCT, and PC significantly increased cell viability of human tenocyte-like cells, whereas PC and AlloPL increased Col1A1 expression and PRP-BCT increased Col3A1 expression. MMP-1, IL-1β, and HGF expression was significantly increased and Scleraxis expression decreased by most blood products. COX1 expression significantly decreased by PC and AlloPL. No clear positive effects on tendon cell biology could be shown, which might partially explain the weak outcome results in clinical practice. Pooled PL seemed to have the most beneficial effects and might be the future in using blood products for tendon tissue regeneration. MDPI 2018-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5796161/ /pubmed/29320421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010212 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Klatte-Schulz, Franka
Schmidt, Tanja
Uckert, Melanie
Scheffler, Sven
Kalus, Ulrich
Rojewski, Markus
Schrezenmeier, Hubert
Pruss, Axel
Wildemann, Britt
Comparative Analysis of Different Platelet Lysates and Platelet Rich Preparations to Stimulate Tendon Cell Biology: An In Vitro Study
title Comparative Analysis of Different Platelet Lysates and Platelet Rich Preparations to Stimulate Tendon Cell Biology: An In Vitro Study
title_full Comparative Analysis of Different Platelet Lysates and Platelet Rich Preparations to Stimulate Tendon Cell Biology: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Different Platelet Lysates and Platelet Rich Preparations to Stimulate Tendon Cell Biology: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Different Platelet Lysates and Platelet Rich Preparations to Stimulate Tendon Cell Biology: An In Vitro Study
title_short Comparative Analysis of Different Platelet Lysates and Platelet Rich Preparations to Stimulate Tendon Cell Biology: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparative analysis of different platelet lysates and platelet rich preparations to stimulate tendon cell biology: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5796161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29320421
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010212
work_keys_str_mv AT klatteschulzfranka comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy
AT schmidttanja comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy
AT uckertmelanie comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy
AT schefflersven comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy
AT kalusulrich comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy
AT rojewskimarkus comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy
AT schrezenmeierhubert comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy
AT prussaxel comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy
AT wildemannbritt comparativeanalysisofdifferentplateletlysatesandplateletrichpreparationstostimulatetendoncellbiologyaninvitrostudy