Cargando…

Experimental Evaluation of UWB Indoor Positioning for Sport Postures

Radio frequency (RF)-based indoor positioning systems (IPSs) use wireless technologies (including Wi-Fi, Zigbee, Bluetooth, and ultra-wide band (UWB)) to estimate the location of persons in areas where no Global Positioning System (GPS) reception is available, for example in indoor stadiums or sport...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ridolfi, Matteo, Vandermeeren, Stef, Defraye, Jense, Steendam, Heidi, Gerlo, Joeri, De Clercq, Dirk, Hoebeke, Jeroen, De Poorter, Eli
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5796305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29315267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18010168
_version_ 1783297480913321984
author Ridolfi, Matteo
Vandermeeren, Stef
Defraye, Jense
Steendam, Heidi
Gerlo, Joeri
De Clercq, Dirk
Hoebeke, Jeroen
De Poorter, Eli
author_facet Ridolfi, Matteo
Vandermeeren, Stef
Defraye, Jense
Steendam, Heidi
Gerlo, Joeri
De Clercq, Dirk
Hoebeke, Jeroen
De Poorter, Eli
author_sort Ridolfi, Matteo
collection PubMed
description Radio frequency (RF)-based indoor positioning systems (IPSs) use wireless technologies (including Wi-Fi, Zigbee, Bluetooth, and ultra-wide band (UWB)) to estimate the location of persons in areas where no Global Positioning System (GPS) reception is available, for example in indoor stadiums or sports halls. Of the above-mentioned forms of radio frequency (RF) technology, UWB is considered one of the most accurate approaches because it can provide positioning estimates with centimeter-level accuracy. However, it is not yet known whether UWB can also offer such accurate position estimates during strenuous dynamic activities in which moves are characterized by fast changes in direction and velocity. To answer this question, this paper investigates the capabilities of UWB indoor localization systems for tracking athletes during their complex (and most of the time unpredictable) movements. To this end, we analyze the impact of on-body tag placement locations and human movement patterns on localization accuracy and communication reliability. Moreover, two localization algorithms (particle filter and Kalman filter) with different optimizations (bias removal, non-line-of-sight (NLoS) detection, and path determination) are implemented. It is shown that although the optimal choice of optimization depends on the type of movement patterns, some of the improvements can reduce the localization error by up to 31%. Overall, depending on the selected optimization and on-body tag placement, our algorithms show good results in terms of positioning accuracy, with average errors in position estimates of 20 cm. This makes UWB a suitable approach for tracking dynamic athletic activities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5796305
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57963052018-02-13 Experimental Evaluation of UWB Indoor Positioning for Sport Postures Ridolfi, Matteo Vandermeeren, Stef Defraye, Jense Steendam, Heidi Gerlo, Joeri De Clercq, Dirk Hoebeke, Jeroen De Poorter, Eli Sensors (Basel) Article Radio frequency (RF)-based indoor positioning systems (IPSs) use wireless technologies (including Wi-Fi, Zigbee, Bluetooth, and ultra-wide band (UWB)) to estimate the location of persons in areas where no Global Positioning System (GPS) reception is available, for example in indoor stadiums or sports halls. Of the above-mentioned forms of radio frequency (RF) technology, UWB is considered one of the most accurate approaches because it can provide positioning estimates with centimeter-level accuracy. However, it is not yet known whether UWB can also offer such accurate position estimates during strenuous dynamic activities in which moves are characterized by fast changes in direction and velocity. To answer this question, this paper investigates the capabilities of UWB indoor localization systems for tracking athletes during their complex (and most of the time unpredictable) movements. To this end, we analyze the impact of on-body tag placement locations and human movement patterns on localization accuracy and communication reliability. Moreover, two localization algorithms (particle filter and Kalman filter) with different optimizations (bias removal, non-line-of-sight (NLoS) detection, and path determination) are implemented. It is shown that although the optimal choice of optimization depends on the type of movement patterns, some of the improvements can reduce the localization error by up to 31%. Overall, depending on the selected optimization and on-body tag placement, our algorithms show good results in terms of positioning accuracy, with average errors in position estimates of 20 cm. This makes UWB a suitable approach for tracking dynamic athletic activities. MDPI 2018-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5796305/ /pubmed/29315267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18010168 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ridolfi, Matteo
Vandermeeren, Stef
Defraye, Jense
Steendam, Heidi
Gerlo, Joeri
De Clercq, Dirk
Hoebeke, Jeroen
De Poorter, Eli
Experimental Evaluation of UWB Indoor Positioning for Sport Postures
title Experimental Evaluation of UWB Indoor Positioning for Sport Postures
title_full Experimental Evaluation of UWB Indoor Positioning for Sport Postures
title_fullStr Experimental Evaluation of UWB Indoor Positioning for Sport Postures
title_full_unstemmed Experimental Evaluation of UWB Indoor Positioning for Sport Postures
title_short Experimental Evaluation of UWB Indoor Positioning for Sport Postures
title_sort experimental evaluation of uwb indoor positioning for sport postures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5796305/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29315267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s18010168
work_keys_str_mv AT ridolfimatteo experimentalevaluationofuwbindoorpositioningforsportpostures
AT vandermeerenstef experimentalevaluationofuwbindoorpositioningforsportpostures
AT defrayejense experimentalevaluationofuwbindoorpositioningforsportpostures
AT steendamheidi experimentalevaluationofuwbindoorpositioningforsportpostures
AT gerlojoeri experimentalevaluationofuwbindoorpositioningforsportpostures
AT declercqdirk experimentalevaluationofuwbindoorpositioningforsportpostures
AT hoebekejeroen experimentalevaluationofuwbindoorpositioningforsportpostures
AT depoortereli experimentalevaluationofuwbindoorpositioningforsportpostures