Cargando…
Measuring social exclusion in healthcare settings: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: Social exclusion is a concept that has been widely debated in recent years; a particular focus of the discussion has been its significance in relation to health. The meanings of the phrase “social exclusion”, and the closely associated term “social inclusion”, are contested in the litera...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5796599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29391016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0732-1 |
_version_ | 1783297531204075520 |
---|---|
author | O’Donnell, Patrick O’Donovan, Diarmuid Elmusharaf, Khalifa |
author_facet | O’Donnell, Patrick O’Donovan, Diarmuid Elmusharaf, Khalifa |
author_sort | O’Donnell, Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Social exclusion is a concept that has been widely debated in recent years; a particular focus of the discussion has been its significance in relation to health. The meanings of the phrase “social exclusion”, and the closely associated term “social inclusion”, are contested in the literature. Both of these concepts are important in relation to health and the area of primary healthcare in particular. Thus, several tools for the measurement of social exclusion or social inclusion status in health care settings have been developed. METHODS: A scoping review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature was conducted to examine tools developed since 2000 that measure social exclusion or social inclusion. We focused on those measurement tools developed for use with individual patients in healthcare settings. Efforts were made to obtain a copy of each of the original tools, and all relevant background literature. All tools retrieved were compared in tables, and the specific domains that were included in each measure were tabulated. RESULTS: Twenty-two measurement tools were included in the final scoping review. The majority of these had been specifically developed for the measurement of social inclusion or social exclusion, but a small number were created for the measurement of other closely aligned concepts. The majority of the tools included were constructed for engaging with patients in mental health settings. The tools varied greatly in their design, the scoring systems and the ways they were administered. The domains covered by these tools varied widely and some of the tools were quite narrow in the areas of focus. A review of the definitions of both social inclusion and social exclusion also revealed the variations among the explanations of these complex concepts. CONCLUSIONS: There are several definitions of both social inclusion and social exclusion in use and they differ greatly in scope. While there are many tools that have been developed for measuring these concepts in healthcare settings, these do not have a primary healthcare focus. There is a need for the development of a tool for measuring social inclusion or social exclusion in primary healthcare settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12939-018-0732-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5796599 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57965992018-02-12 Measuring social exclusion in healthcare settings: a scoping review O’Donnell, Patrick O’Donovan, Diarmuid Elmusharaf, Khalifa Int J Equity Health Review BACKGROUND: Social exclusion is a concept that has been widely debated in recent years; a particular focus of the discussion has been its significance in relation to health. The meanings of the phrase “social exclusion”, and the closely associated term “social inclusion”, are contested in the literature. Both of these concepts are important in relation to health and the area of primary healthcare in particular. Thus, several tools for the measurement of social exclusion or social inclusion status in health care settings have been developed. METHODS: A scoping review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature was conducted to examine tools developed since 2000 that measure social exclusion or social inclusion. We focused on those measurement tools developed for use with individual patients in healthcare settings. Efforts were made to obtain a copy of each of the original tools, and all relevant background literature. All tools retrieved were compared in tables, and the specific domains that were included in each measure were tabulated. RESULTS: Twenty-two measurement tools were included in the final scoping review. The majority of these had been specifically developed for the measurement of social inclusion or social exclusion, but a small number were created for the measurement of other closely aligned concepts. The majority of the tools included were constructed for engaging with patients in mental health settings. The tools varied greatly in their design, the scoring systems and the ways they were administered. The domains covered by these tools varied widely and some of the tools were quite narrow in the areas of focus. A review of the definitions of both social inclusion and social exclusion also revealed the variations among the explanations of these complex concepts. CONCLUSIONS: There are several definitions of both social inclusion and social exclusion in use and they differ greatly in scope. While there are many tools that have been developed for measuring these concepts in healthcare settings, these do not have a primary healthcare focus. There is a need for the development of a tool for measuring social inclusion or social exclusion in primary healthcare settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12939-018-0732-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5796599/ /pubmed/29391016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0732-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review O’Donnell, Patrick O’Donovan, Diarmuid Elmusharaf, Khalifa Measuring social exclusion in healthcare settings: a scoping review |
title | Measuring social exclusion in healthcare settings: a scoping review |
title_full | Measuring social exclusion in healthcare settings: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Measuring social exclusion in healthcare settings: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring social exclusion in healthcare settings: a scoping review |
title_short | Measuring social exclusion in healthcare settings: a scoping review |
title_sort | measuring social exclusion in healthcare settings: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5796599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29391016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0732-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT odonnellpatrick measuringsocialexclusioninhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT odonovandiarmuid measuringsocialexclusioninhealthcaresettingsascopingreview AT elmusharafkhalifa measuringsocialexclusioninhealthcaresettingsascopingreview |