Cargando…

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in a public teaching hospital setting

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficiency and practicality of femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) in a public teaching hospital setting using a mobile FLACS system compared to conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery (CPCS). METHODS: Ninety eyes from 90 patients underwent eithe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vasquez-Perez, Alfonso, Simpson, Andrew, Nanavaty, Mayank A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5797358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29394929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0693-6
_version_ 1783297668734255104
author Vasquez-Perez, Alfonso
Simpson, Andrew
Nanavaty, Mayank A.
author_facet Vasquez-Perez, Alfonso
Simpson, Andrew
Nanavaty, Mayank A.
author_sort Vasquez-Perez, Alfonso
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficiency and practicality of femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) in a public teaching hospital setting using a mobile FLACS system compared to conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery (CPCS). METHODS: Ninety eyes from 90 patients underwent either FLACS or CPCS (45 in each group). Cataracts were graded using the Lens Opacities Classification System III system. Outcome measures included total surgery duration, femtosecond laser treatment time, vacuum time (VT), total phacoemulsification time (TPT) and total phacoemulsification power (TPP). RESULTS: No differences were observed in the preoperative mean cataract grades and co-morbidities. FLACS took longer than CPCS with a mean difference of 5.2 ± 4.5 min (range: 0–18.8 min). The average femtosecond laser treatment time was 4.3 ± 3.4 min (range: 1–15.5 min). The VT was 2.51 ± 0.45 min (range: 1.59–4.10 min). Although not significant, TPT in FLACS showed a trend towards improvement (mean 1.0 ± 0.6 s; range: 0.1–2.4 s) compared to CPCS (mean 1.2 ± 0.6 min; range: 0.5–2.5 min). Whereas, TPP was significantly less in FLACS (mean 17.9 ± 5.0%; range: 5–27%) compared to CPCS (mean 20.3 ± 4.1%; range: 12.0–28.7%)(p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: The mobile FLACS system housed in the same operating room increased the surgical duration by 5.2 min. The average VT was 2.51 min, which was lower in comparison to published experience using non-mobile FLACS systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5797358
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57973582018-02-12 Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in a public teaching hospital setting Vasquez-Perez, Alfonso Simpson, Andrew Nanavaty, Mayank A. BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficiency and practicality of femtosecond laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) in a public teaching hospital setting using a mobile FLACS system compared to conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery (CPCS). METHODS: Ninety eyes from 90 patients underwent either FLACS or CPCS (45 in each group). Cataracts were graded using the Lens Opacities Classification System III system. Outcome measures included total surgery duration, femtosecond laser treatment time, vacuum time (VT), total phacoemulsification time (TPT) and total phacoemulsification power (TPP). RESULTS: No differences were observed in the preoperative mean cataract grades and co-morbidities. FLACS took longer than CPCS with a mean difference of 5.2 ± 4.5 min (range: 0–18.8 min). The average femtosecond laser treatment time was 4.3 ± 3.4 min (range: 1–15.5 min). The VT was 2.51 ± 0.45 min (range: 1.59–4.10 min). Although not significant, TPT in FLACS showed a trend towards improvement (mean 1.0 ± 0.6 s; range: 0.1–2.4 s) compared to CPCS (mean 1.2 ± 0.6 min; range: 0.5–2.5 min). Whereas, TPP was significantly less in FLACS (mean 17.9 ± 5.0%; range: 5–27%) compared to CPCS (mean 20.3 ± 4.1%; range: 12.0–28.7%)(p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: The mobile FLACS system housed in the same operating room increased the surgical duration by 5.2 min. The average VT was 2.51 min, which was lower in comparison to published experience using non-mobile FLACS systems. BioMed Central 2018-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5797358/ /pubmed/29394929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0693-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vasquez-Perez, Alfonso
Simpson, Andrew
Nanavaty, Mayank A.
Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in a public teaching hospital setting
title Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in a public teaching hospital setting
title_full Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in a public teaching hospital setting
title_fullStr Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in a public teaching hospital setting
title_full_unstemmed Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in a public teaching hospital setting
title_short Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in a public teaching hospital setting
title_sort femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in a public teaching hospital setting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5797358/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29394929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-018-0693-6
work_keys_str_mv AT vasquezperezalfonso femtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgeryinapublicteachinghospitalsetting
AT simpsonandrew femtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgeryinapublicteachinghospitalsetting
AT nanavatymayanka femtosecondlaserassistedcataractsurgeryinapublicteachinghospitalsetting