Cargando…

Radiation-related occupational cancer and its recognition criteria in South Korea

Ionizing radiation is a well-known carcinogen, and is listed as one carcinogenic agent of occupational cancer. Given the increase in the number of workers exposed to radiation, as well as the increase in concern regarding occupational cancer, the number of radiation-related occupational cancer claim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seo, Songwon, Lee, Dalnim, Seong, Ki Moon, Park, Sunhoo, Kim, Soo-Geun, Won, Jong-Uk, Jin, Young Woo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5797363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40557-018-0219-y
_version_ 1783297669905514496
author Seo, Songwon
Lee, Dalnim
Seong, Ki Moon
Park, Sunhoo
Kim, Soo-Geun
Won, Jong-Uk
Jin, Young Woo
author_facet Seo, Songwon
Lee, Dalnim
Seong, Ki Moon
Park, Sunhoo
Kim, Soo-Geun
Won, Jong-Uk
Jin, Young Woo
author_sort Seo, Songwon
collection PubMed
description Ionizing radiation is a well-known carcinogen, and is listed as one carcinogenic agent of occupational cancer. Given the increase in the number of workers exposed to radiation, as well as the increase in concern regarding occupational cancer, the number of radiation-related occupational cancer claims is expected to increase. Unlike exposure assessment of other carcinogenic agents in the workplace, such as asbestos and benzene, radiation exposure is usually assessed on an individual basis with personal dosimeters, which makes it feasible to assess whether a worker’s cancer occurrence is associated with their individual exposure. However, given the absence of a threshold dose for cancer initiation, it remains difficult to identify radiation exposure as the root cause of occupational cancer. Moreover, the association between cancer and radiation exposure in the workplace has not been clearly established due to a lack of scientific evidence. Therefore, criteria for the recognition of radiation-related occupational cancer should be carefully reviewed and updated with new scientific evidence and social consensus. The current criteria in Korea are valid in terms of eligible radiogenic cancer sites, adequate latent period, assessment of radiation exposure, and probability of causation. However, reducing uncertainty with respect to the determination of causation between exposure and cancer and developing more specific criteria that considers mixed exposure to radiation and other carcinogenic agents remains an important open question.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5797363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57973632018-02-12 Radiation-related occupational cancer and its recognition criteria in South Korea Seo, Songwon Lee, Dalnim Seong, Ki Moon Park, Sunhoo Kim, Soo-Geun Won, Jong-Uk Jin, Young Woo Ann Occup Environ Med Review Ionizing radiation is a well-known carcinogen, and is listed as one carcinogenic agent of occupational cancer. Given the increase in the number of workers exposed to radiation, as well as the increase in concern regarding occupational cancer, the number of radiation-related occupational cancer claims is expected to increase. Unlike exposure assessment of other carcinogenic agents in the workplace, such as asbestos and benzene, radiation exposure is usually assessed on an individual basis with personal dosimeters, which makes it feasible to assess whether a worker’s cancer occurrence is associated with their individual exposure. However, given the absence of a threshold dose for cancer initiation, it remains difficult to identify radiation exposure as the root cause of occupational cancer. Moreover, the association between cancer and radiation exposure in the workplace has not been clearly established due to a lack of scientific evidence. Therefore, criteria for the recognition of radiation-related occupational cancer should be carefully reviewed and updated with new scientific evidence and social consensus. The current criteria in Korea are valid in terms of eligible radiogenic cancer sites, adequate latent period, assessment of radiation exposure, and probability of causation. However, reducing uncertainty with respect to the determination of causation between exposure and cancer and developing more specific criteria that considers mixed exposure to radiation and other carcinogenic agents remains an important open question. BioMed Central 2018-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5797363/ /pubmed/29435340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40557-018-0219-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Seo, Songwon
Lee, Dalnim
Seong, Ki Moon
Park, Sunhoo
Kim, Soo-Geun
Won, Jong-Uk
Jin, Young Woo
Radiation-related occupational cancer and its recognition criteria in South Korea
title Radiation-related occupational cancer and its recognition criteria in South Korea
title_full Radiation-related occupational cancer and its recognition criteria in South Korea
title_fullStr Radiation-related occupational cancer and its recognition criteria in South Korea
title_full_unstemmed Radiation-related occupational cancer and its recognition criteria in South Korea
title_short Radiation-related occupational cancer and its recognition criteria in South Korea
title_sort radiation-related occupational cancer and its recognition criteria in south korea
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5797363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29435340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40557-018-0219-y
work_keys_str_mv AT seosongwon radiationrelatedoccupationalcanceranditsrecognitioncriteriainsouthkorea
AT leedalnim radiationrelatedoccupationalcanceranditsrecognitioncriteriainsouthkorea
AT seongkimoon radiationrelatedoccupationalcanceranditsrecognitioncriteriainsouthkorea
AT parksunhoo radiationrelatedoccupationalcanceranditsrecognitioncriteriainsouthkorea
AT kimsoogeun radiationrelatedoccupationalcanceranditsrecognitioncriteriainsouthkorea
AT wonjonguk radiationrelatedoccupationalcanceranditsrecognitioncriteriainsouthkorea
AT jinyoungwoo radiationrelatedoccupationalcanceranditsrecognitioncriteriainsouthkorea