Cargando…

Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasia

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the genetic contribution to Müllerian aplasia, better known to patients as Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Mutations in two genes (WNT4 and HNF1B) account for a small number of patients, but heterozygous copy number variants (CNVs) have been describe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Demir Eksi, Durkadin, Shen, Yiping, Erman, Munire, Chorich, Lynn P., Sullivan, Megan E., Bilekdemir, Meric, Yılmaz, Elanur, Luleci, Guven, Kim, Hyung-Goo, Alper, Ozgul M., Layman, Lawrence C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5797403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29434669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-018-0359-3
_version_ 1783297679374155776
author Demir Eksi, Durkadin
Shen, Yiping
Erman, Munire
Chorich, Lynn P.
Sullivan, Megan E.
Bilekdemir, Meric
Yılmaz, Elanur
Luleci, Guven
Kim, Hyung-Goo
Alper, Ozgul M.
Layman, Lawrence C.
author_facet Demir Eksi, Durkadin
Shen, Yiping
Erman, Munire
Chorich, Lynn P.
Sullivan, Megan E.
Bilekdemir, Meric
Yılmaz, Elanur
Luleci, Guven
Kim, Hyung-Goo
Alper, Ozgul M.
Layman, Lawrence C.
author_sort Demir Eksi, Durkadin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Little is known about the genetic contribution to Müllerian aplasia, better known to patients as Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Mutations in two genes (WNT4 and HNF1B) account for a small number of patients, but heterozygous copy number variants (CNVs) have been described. However, the significance of these CNVs in the pathogenesis of MRKH is unknown, but suggests possible autosomal dominant inheritance. We are not aware of CNV studies in consanguineous patients, which could pinpoint genes important in autosomal recessive MRKH. We therefore utilized SNP/CGH microarrays to identify CNVs and define regions of homozygosity (ROH) in Anatolian Turkish MRKH patients. RESULT(S): Five different CNVs were detected in 4/19 patients (21%), one of which is a previously reported 16p11.2 deletion containing 32 genes, while four involved smaller regions each containing only one gene. Fourteen of 19 (74%) of patients had parents that were third degree relatives or closer. There were 42 regions of homozygosity shared by at least two MRKH patients which was spread throughout most chromosomes. Of interest, eight candidate genes suggested by human or animal studies (RBM8A, CMTM7, CCR4, TRIM71, CNOT10, TP63, EMX2, and CFTR) reside within these ROH. CONCLUSION(S): CNVs were found in about 20% of Turkish MRKH patients, and as in other studies, proof of causation is lacking. The 16p11.2 deletion seen in mixed populations is also identified in Turkish MRKH patients. Turkish MRKH patients have a higher likelihood of being consanguineous than the general Anatolian Turkish population. Although identified single gene mutations and heterozygous CNVs suggest autosomal dominant inheritance for MRKH in much of the western world, regions of homozygosity, which could contain shared mutant alleles, make it more likely that autosomal recessively inherited causes will be manifested in Turkish women with MRKH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5797403
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57974032018-02-12 Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasia Demir Eksi, Durkadin Shen, Yiping Erman, Munire Chorich, Lynn P. Sullivan, Megan E. Bilekdemir, Meric Yılmaz, Elanur Luleci, Guven Kim, Hyung-Goo Alper, Ozgul M. Layman, Lawrence C. Mol Cytogenet Research BACKGROUND: Little is known about the genetic contribution to Müllerian aplasia, better known to patients as Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome. Mutations in two genes (WNT4 and HNF1B) account for a small number of patients, but heterozygous copy number variants (CNVs) have been described. However, the significance of these CNVs in the pathogenesis of MRKH is unknown, but suggests possible autosomal dominant inheritance. We are not aware of CNV studies in consanguineous patients, which could pinpoint genes important in autosomal recessive MRKH. We therefore utilized SNP/CGH microarrays to identify CNVs and define regions of homozygosity (ROH) in Anatolian Turkish MRKH patients. RESULT(S): Five different CNVs were detected in 4/19 patients (21%), one of which is a previously reported 16p11.2 deletion containing 32 genes, while four involved smaller regions each containing only one gene. Fourteen of 19 (74%) of patients had parents that were third degree relatives or closer. There were 42 regions of homozygosity shared by at least two MRKH patients which was spread throughout most chromosomes. Of interest, eight candidate genes suggested by human or animal studies (RBM8A, CMTM7, CCR4, TRIM71, CNOT10, TP63, EMX2, and CFTR) reside within these ROH. CONCLUSION(S): CNVs were found in about 20% of Turkish MRKH patients, and as in other studies, proof of causation is lacking. The 16p11.2 deletion seen in mixed populations is also identified in Turkish MRKH patients. Turkish MRKH patients have a higher likelihood of being consanguineous than the general Anatolian Turkish population. Although identified single gene mutations and heterozygous CNVs suggest autosomal dominant inheritance for MRKH in much of the western world, regions of homozygosity, which could contain shared mutant alleles, make it more likely that autosomal recessively inherited causes will be manifested in Turkish women with MRKH. BioMed Central 2018-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5797403/ /pubmed/29434669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-018-0359-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Demir Eksi, Durkadin
Shen, Yiping
Erman, Munire
Chorich, Lynn P.
Sullivan, Megan E.
Bilekdemir, Meric
Yılmaz, Elanur
Luleci, Guven
Kim, Hyung-Goo
Alper, Ozgul M.
Layman, Lawrence C.
Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasia
title Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasia
title_full Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasia
title_fullStr Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasia
title_full_unstemmed Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasia
title_short Copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with MÜLLERIAN aplasia
title_sort copy number variation and regions of homozygosity analysis in patients with müllerian aplasia
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5797403/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29434669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13039-018-0359-3
work_keys_str_mv AT demireksidurkadin copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT shenyiping copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT ermanmunire copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT chorichlynnp copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT sullivanmegane copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT bilekdemirmeric copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT yılmazelanur copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT luleciguven copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT kimhyunggoo copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT alperozgulm copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia
AT laymanlawrencec copynumbervariationandregionsofhomozygosityanalysisinpatientswithmullerianaplasia