Cargando…
Clinimetric properties of the Nepali version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in individuals with chronic pain
BACKGROUND: Pain catastrophizing is an exaggerated negative cognitive response related to pain. It is commonly assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Translation and validation of the scale in a new language would facilitate cross-cultural comparisons of the role that pain catastrophiz...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5797459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29430196 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S153061 |
_version_ | 1783297691382448128 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Saurab Thibault, Pascal Abbott, J Haxby Jensen, Mark P |
author_facet | Sharma, Saurab Thibault, Pascal Abbott, J Haxby Jensen, Mark P |
author_sort | Sharma, Saurab |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pain catastrophizing is an exaggerated negative cognitive response related to pain. It is commonly assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Translation and validation of the scale in a new language would facilitate cross-cultural comparisons of the role that pain catastrophizing plays in patient function. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the PCS into Nepali (Nepali version of PCS [PCS-NP]) and evaluate its clinimetric properties. METHODS: We translated, cross-culturally adapted, and performed an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the PCS-NP in a sample of adults with chronic pain (N=143). We then confirmed the resulting factor model in a separate sample (N=272) and compared this model with 1-, 2-, and 3-factor models previously identified using confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs). We also computed internal consistencies, test–retest reliabilities, standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), and limits of agreement with 95% confidence interval (LOA(95%)) of the PCS-NP scales. Concurrent validity with measures of depression, anxiety, and pain intensity was assessed by computing Pearson’s correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The PCS-NP was comprehensible and culturally acceptable. We extracted a two-factor solution using EFA and confirmed this model using CFAs in the second sample. Adequate fit was also found for a one-factor model and different two- and three-factor models based on prior studies. The PCS-NP scores evidenced excellent reliability and temporal stability, and demonstrated validity via moderate-to-strong associations with measures of depression, anxiety, and pain intensity. The SEM and MDC for the PCS-NP total score were 2.52 and 7.86, respectively (range of PCS scores 0–52). LOA(95%) was between −15.17 and +16.02 for the total PCS-NP scores. CONCLUSION: The PCS-NP is a valid and reliable instrument to assess pain catastrophizing in Nepalese individuals with chronic pain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5797459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57974592018-02-09 Clinimetric properties of the Nepali version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in individuals with chronic pain Sharma, Saurab Thibault, Pascal Abbott, J Haxby Jensen, Mark P J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: Pain catastrophizing is an exaggerated negative cognitive response related to pain. It is commonly assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Translation and validation of the scale in a new language would facilitate cross-cultural comparisons of the role that pain catastrophizing plays in patient function. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to translate and culturally adapt the PCS into Nepali (Nepali version of PCS [PCS-NP]) and evaluate its clinimetric properties. METHODS: We translated, cross-culturally adapted, and performed an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the PCS-NP in a sample of adults with chronic pain (N=143). We then confirmed the resulting factor model in a separate sample (N=272) and compared this model with 1-, 2-, and 3-factor models previously identified using confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs). We also computed internal consistencies, test–retest reliabilities, standard error of measurement (SEM), minimal detectable change (MDC), and limits of agreement with 95% confidence interval (LOA(95%)) of the PCS-NP scales. Concurrent validity with measures of depression, anxiety, and pain intensity was assessed by computing Pearson’s correlation coefficients. RESULTS: The PCS-NP was comprehensible and culturally acceptable. We extracted a two-factor solution using EFA and confirmed this model using CFAs in the second sample. Adequate fit was also found for a one-factor model and different two- and three-factor models based on prior studies. The PCS-NP scores evidenced excellent reliability and temporal stability, and demonstrated validity via moderate-to-strong associations with measures of depression, anxiety, and pain intensity. The SEM and MDC for the PCS-NP total score were 2.52 and 7.86, respectively (range of PCS scores 0–52). LOA(95%) was between −15.17 and +16.02 for the total PCS-NP scores. CONCLUSION: The PCS-NP is a valid and reliable instrument to assess pain catastrophizing in Nepalese individuals with chronic pain. Dove Medical Press 2018-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5797459/ /pubmed/29430196 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S153061 Text en © 2018 Sharma et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sharma, Saurab Thibault, Pascal Abbott, J Haxby Jensen, Mark P Clinimetric properties of the Nepali version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in individuals with chronic pain |
title | Clinimetric properties of the Nepali version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in individuals with chronic pain |
title_full | Clinimetric properties of the Nepali version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in individuals with chronic pain |
title_fullStr | Clinimetric properties of the Nepali version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in individuals with chronic pain |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinimetric properties of the Nepali version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in individuals with chronic pain |
title_short | Clinimetric properties of the Nepali version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in individuals with chronic pain |
title_sort | clinimetric properties of the nepali version of the pain catastrophizing scale in individuals with chronic pain |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5797459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29430196 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S153061 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmasaurab clinimetricpropertiesofthenepaliversionofthepaincatastrophizingscaleinindividualswithchronicpain AT thibaultpascal clinimetricpropertiesofthenepaliversionofthepaincatastrophizingscaleinindividualswithchronicpain AT abbottjhaxby clinimetricpropertiesofthenepaliversionofthepaincatastrophizingscaleinindividualswithchronicpain AT jensenmarkp clinimetricpropertiesofthenepaliversionofthepaincatastrophizingscaleinindividualswithchronicpain |