Cargando…

Specialty Training’s Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change (STORC): validation of a questionnaire

BACKGROUND: The field of postgraduate medical education (PGME) is continuously evolving as a result of social demands and advancing educational insights. Change experts contend that organizational readiness for change (ORC) is a critical precursor for successful implementation of change initiatives....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bank, Lindsay, Jippes, Mariëlle, Leppink, Jimmie, Scherpbier, Albert JJA, den Rooyen, Corry, van Luijk, Scheltus J, Scheele, Fedde
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5797471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29430202
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S146018
_version_ 1783297694225137664
author Bank, Lindsay
Jippes, Mariëlle
Leppink, Jimmie
Scherpbier, Albert JJA
den Rooyen, Corry
van Luijk, Scheltus J
Scheele, Fedde
author_facet Bank, Lindsay
Jippes, Mariëlle
Leppink, Jimmie
Scherpbier, Albert JJA
den Rooyen, Corry
van Luijk, Scheltus J
Scheele, Fedde
author_sort Bank, Lindsay
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The field of postgraduate medical education (PGME) is continuously evolving as a result of social demands and advancing educational insights. Change experts contend that organizational readiness for change (ORC) is a critical precursor for successful implementation of change initiatives. However, in PGME, assessing change readiness is rarely considered while it could be of great value for managing educational change such as curriculum change. Therefore, in a previous Delphi study the authors developed an instrument for assessing ORC in PGME: Specialty Training’s Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change (STORC). In this study, the psychometric properties of this questionnaire were further explored. METHODS: In 2015, STORC was distributed among clinical teaching teams in the Netherlands. The authors conducted a confirmatory factor analysis on the internal factor structure of STORC. The reliability of the measurements was estimated by calculating Cronbach’s alpha for all sub-scales. Additionally, a behavioral support-for-change measure was distributed as well to assess correlations with change-related behavior. RESULTS: In total, the STORC questionnaire was completed by 856 clinical teaching team members from 39 specialties. Factor analysis led to the removal of 1 item but supported the expected factor structure with very good fit for the other 43 items. Supportive behavior was positively correlated to a higher level of ORC. DISCUSSION: In this study, additional steps to collect validity evidence for the STORC questionnaire were taken successfully. The final subscales of STORC represent the core components of ORC in the literature. By breaking down this concept into multiple measurable aspects, STORC could help to enable educational leaders to diagnose possible hurdles in implementation processes and to perform specifically targeted interventions when needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5797471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57974712018-02-09 Specialty Training’s Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change (STORC): validation of a questionnaire Bank, Lindsay Jippes, Mariëlle Leppink, Jimmie Scherpbier, Albert JJA den Rooyen, Corry van Luijk, Scheltus J Scheele, Fedde Adv Med Educ Pract Original Research BACKGROUND: The field of postgraduate medical education (PGME) is continuously evolving as a result of social demands and advancing educational insights. Change experts contend that organizational readiness for change (ORC) is a critical precursor for successful implementation of change initiatives. However, in PGME, assessing change readiness is rarely considered while it could be of great value for managing educational change such as curriculum change. Therefore, in a previous Delphi study the authors developed an instrument for assessing ORC in PGME: Specialty Training’s Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change (STORC). In this study, the psychometric properties of this questionnaire were further explored. METHODS: In 2015, STORC was distributed among clinical teaching teams in the Netherlands. The authors conducted a confirmatory factor analysis on the internal factor structure of STORC. The reliability of the measurements was estimated by calculating Cronbach’s alpha for all sub-scales. Additionally, a behavioral support-for-change measure was distributed as well to assess correlations with change-related behavior. RESULTS: In total, the STORC questionnaire was completed by 856 clinical teaching team members from 39 specialties. Factor analysis led to the removal of 1 item but supported the expected factor structure with very good fit for the other 43 items. Supportive behavior was positively correlated to a higher level of ORC. DISCUSSION: In this study, additional steps to collect validity evidence for the STORC questionnaire were taken successfully. The final subscales of STORC represent the core components of ORC in the literature. By breaking down this concept into multiple measurable aspects, STORC could help to enable educational leaders to diagnose possible hurdles in implementation processes and to perform specifically targeted interventions when needed. Dove Medical Press 2018-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5797471/ /pubmed/29430202 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S146018 Text en © 2018 Bank et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bank, Lindsay
Jippes, Mariëlle
Leppink, Jimmie
Scherpbier, Albert JJA
den Rooyen, Corry
van Luijk, Scheltus J
Scheele, Fedde
Specialty Training’s Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change (STORC): validation of a questionnaire
title Specialty Training’s Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change (STORC): validation of a questionnaire
title_full Specialty Training’s Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change (STORC): validation of a questionnaire
title_fullStr Specialty Training’s Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change (STORC): validation of a questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Specialty Training’s Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change (STORC): validation of a questionnaire
title_short Specialty Training’s Organizational Readiness for curriculum Change (STORC): validation of a questionnaire
title_sort specialty training’s organizational readiness for curriculum change (storc): validation of a questionnaire
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5797471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29430202
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S146018
work_keys_str_mv AT banklindsay specialtytrainingsorganizationalreadinessforcurriculumchangestorcvalidationofaquestionnaire
AT jippesmarielle specialtytrainingsorganizationalreadinessforcurriculumchangestorcvalidationofaquestionnaire
AT leppinkjimmie specialtytrainingsorganizationalreadinessforcurriculumchangestorcvalidationofaquestionnaire
AT scherpbieralbertjja specialtytrainingsorganizationalreadinessforcurriculumchangestorcvalidationofaquestionnaire
AT denrooyencorry specialtytrainingsorganizationalreadinessforcurriculumchangestorcvalidationofaquestionnaire
AT vanluijkscheltusj specialtytrainingsorganizationalreadinessforcurriculumchangestorcvalidationofaquestionnaire
AT scheelefedde specialtytrainingsorganizationalreadinessforcurriculumchangestorcvalidationofaquestionnaire