Cargando…

Interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: Systematic investigation of Joubert Syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity

PURPOSE: Next generation sequencing (NGS) often identifies multiple rare predicted-deleterious variants (RDVs) in different genes associated with a recessive disorder in a given patient. Such variants have been proposed to contribute to digenicity/oligogenicity or “tri-allelism”, or to act as geneti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phelps, Ian G., Dempsey, Jennifer C., Grout, Megan E., Isabella, Christine R., Tully, Hannah M., Doherty, Dan, Bachmann-Gagescu, Ruxandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5797514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28771248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.94
_version_ 1783297697019592704
author Phelps, Ian G.
Dempsey, Jennifer C.
Grout, Megan E.
Isabella, Christine R.
Tully, Hannah M.
Doherty, Dan
Bachmann-Gagescu, Ruxandra
author_facet Phelps, Ian G.
Dempsey, Jennifer C.
Grout, Megan E.
Isabella, Christine R.
Tully, Hannah M.
Doherty, Dan
Bachmann-Gagescu, Ruxandra
author_sort Phelps, Ian G.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Next generation sequencing (NGS) often identifies multiple rare predicted-deleterious variants (RDVs) in different genes associated with a recessive disorder in a given patient. Such variants have been proposed to contribute to digenicity/oligogenicity or “tri-allelism”, or to act as genetic modifiers. METHODS: Using the recessive ciliopathy Joubert syndrome (JBTS) as a model, we investigated these possibilities systematically, relying on NGS of known JBTS genes in a large JBTS and two control cohorts. RESULTS: 65% of affected individuals had a recessive genetic cause, while 4.9% were candidates for di-/oligogenicity, harboring heterozygous RDVs in ≥2 genes, compared to 4.2–8% in controls (p = 0.66–0.21). Based on ExAC allele frequencies, the probability of cumulating RDVs in any two JBTS genes is 9.3%. We found no support for “tri-allelism” as no unaffected siblings carried the same bi-allelic RDVs as their affected relative. 60% of individuals sharing identical causal RDVs displayed phenotypic discordance. While 38% of affected individuals harbored RDVs in addition to the causal mutations, their presence did not correlate with phenotypic severity. CONCLUSION: Our data offer little support for “tri-allelism” or digenicity/oligogenicity as clinically-relevant inheritance modes in JBTS. While phenotypic discordance supports the existence of genetic modifiers, identifying clinically-relevant modifiers remains challenging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5797514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57975142018-02-23 Interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: Systematic investigation of Joubert Syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity Phelps, Ian G. Dempsey, Jennifer C. Grout, Megan E. Isabella, Christine R. Tully, Hannah M. Doherty, Dan Bachmann-Gagescu, Ruxandra Genet Med Article PURPOSE: Next generation sequencing (NGS) often identifies multiple rare predicted-deleterious variants (RDVs) in different genes associated with a recessive disorder in a given patient. Such variants have been proposed to contribute to digenicity/oligogenicity or “tri-allelism”, or to act as genetic modifiers. METHODS: Using the recessive ciliopathy Joubert syndrome (JBTS) as a model, we investigated these possibilities systematically, relying on NGS of known JBTS genes in a large JBTS and two control cohorts. RESULTS: 65% of affected individuals had a recessive genetic cause, while 4.9% were candidates for di-/oligogenicity, harboring heterozygous RDVs in ≥2 genes, compared to 4.2–8% in controls (p = 0.66–0.21). Based on ExAC allele frequencies, the probability of cumulating RDVs in any two JBTS genes is 9.3%. We found no support for “tri-allelism” as no unaffected siblings carried the same bi-allelic RDVs as their affected relative. 60% of individuals sharing identical causal RDVs displayed phenotypic discordance. While 38% of affected individuals harbored RDVs in addition to the causal mutations, their presence did not correlate with phenotypic severity. CONCLUSION: Our data offer little support for “tri-allelism” or digenicity/oligogenicity as clinically-relevant inheritance modes in JBTS. While phenotypic discordance supports the existence of genetic modifiers, identifying clinically-relevant modifiers remains challenging. 2017-08-03 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5797514/ /pubmed/28771248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.94 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Phelps, Ian G.
Dempsey, Jennifer C.
Grout, Megan E.
Isabella, Christine R.
Tully, Hannah M.
Doherty, Dan
Bachmann-Gagescu, Ruxandra
Interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: Systematic investigation of Joubert Syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity
title Interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: Systematic investigation of Joubert Syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity
title_full Interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: Systematic investigation of Joubert Syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity
title_fullStr Interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: Systematic investigation of Joubert Syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity
title_full_unstemmed Interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: Systematic investigation of Joubert Syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity
title_short Interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: Systematic investigation of Joubert Syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity
title_sort interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: systematic investigation of joubert syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5797514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28771248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.94
work_keys_str_mv AT phelpsiang interpretingtheclinicalsignificanceofcombinedvariantsinmultiplerecessivediseasegenessystematicinvestigationofjoubertsyndromeyieldslittlesupportforoligogenicity
AT dempseyjenniferc interpretingtheclinicalsignificanceofcombinedvariantsinmultiplerecessivediseasegenessystematicinvestigationofjoubertsyndromeyieldslittlesupportforoligogenicity
AT groutmegane interpretingtheclinicalsignificanceofcombinedvariantsinmultiplerecessivediseasegenessystematicinvestigationofjoubertsyndromeyieldslittlesupportforoligogenicity
AT isabellachristiner interpretingtheclinicalsignificanceofcombinedvariantsinmultiplerecessivediseasegenessystematicinvestigationofjoubertsyndromeyieldslittlesupportforoligogenicity
AT tullyhannahm interpretingtheclinicalsignificanceofcombinedvariantsinmultiplerecessivediseasegenessystematicinvestigationofjoubertsyndromeyieldslittlesupportforoligogenicity
AT dohertydan interpretingtheclinicalsignificanceofcombinedvariantsinmultiplerecessivediseasegenessystematicinvestigationofjoubertsyndromeyieldslittlesupportforoligogenicity
AT bachmanngagescuruxandra interpretingtheclinicalsignificanceofcombinedvariantsinmultiplerecessivediseasegenessystematicinvestigationofjoubertsyndromeyieldslittlesupportforoligogenicity