Cargando…
Interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: Systematic investigation of Joubert Syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity
PURPOSE: Next generation sequencing (NGS) often identifies multiple rare predicted-deleterious variants (RDVs) in different genes associated with a recessive disorder in a given patient. Such variants have been proposed to contribute to digenicity/oligogenicity or “tri-allelism”, or to act as geneti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5797514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28771248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.94 |
_version_ | 1783297697019592704 |
---|---|
author | Phelps, Ian G. Dempsey, Jennifer C. Grout, Megan E. Isabella, Christine R. Tully, Hannah M. Doherty, Dan Bachmann-Gagescu, Ruxandra |
author_facet | Phelps, Ian G. Dempsey, Jennifer C. Grout, Megan E. Isabella, Christine R. Tully, Hannah M. Doherty, Dan Bachmann-Gagescu, Ruxandra |
author_sort | Phelps, Ian G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Next generation sequencing (NGS) often identifies multiple rare predicted-deleterious variants (RDVs) in different genes associated with a recessive disorder in a given patient. Such variants have been proposed to contribute to digenicity/oligogenicity or “tri-allelism”, or to act as genetic modifiers. METHODS: Using the recessive ciliopathy Joubert syndrome (JBTS) as a model, we investigated these possibilities systematically, relying on NGS of known JBTS genes in a large JBTS and two control cohorts. RESULTS: 65% of affected individuals had a recessive genetic cause, while 4.9% were candidates for di-/oligogenicity, harboring heterozygous RDVs in ≥2 genes, compared to 4.2–8% in controls (p = 0.66–0.21). Based on ExAC allele frequencies, the probability of cumulating RDVs in any two JBTS genes is 9.3%. We found no support for “tri-allelism” as no unaffected siblings carried the same bi-allelic RDVs as their affected relative. 60% of individuals sharing identical causal RDVs displayed phenotypic discordance. While 38% of affected individuals harbored RDVs in addition to the causal mutations, their presence did not correlate with phenotypic severity. CONCLUSION: Our data offer little support for “tri-allelism” or digenicity/oligogenicity as clinically-relevant inheritance modes in JBTS. While phenotypic discordance supports the existence of genetic modifiers, identifying clinically-relevant modifiers remains challenging. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5797514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57975142018-02-23 Interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: Systematic investigation of Joubert Syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity Phelps, Ian G. Dempsey, Jennifer C. Grout, Megan E. Isabella, Christine R. Tully, Hannah M. Doherty, Dan Bachmann-Gagescu, Ruxandra Genet Med Article PURPOSE: Next generation sequencing (NGS) often identifies multiple rare predicted-deleterious variants (RDVs) in different genes associated with a recessive disorder in a given patient. Such variants have been proposed to contribute to digenicity/oligogenicity or “tri-allelism”, or to act as genetic modifiers. METHODS: Using the recessive ciliopathy Joubert syndrome (JBTS) as a model, we investigated these possibilities systematically, relying on NGS of known JBTS genes in a large JBTS and two control cohorts. RESULTS: 65% of affected individuals had a recessive genetic cause, while 4.9% were candidates for di-/oligogenicity, harboring heterozygous RDVs in ≥2 genes, compared to 4.2–8% in controls (p = 0.66–0.21). Based on ExAC allele frequencies, the probability of cumulating RDVs in any two JBTS genes is 9.3%. We found no support for “tri-allelism” as no unaffected siblings carried the same bi-allelic RDVs as their affected relative. 60% of individuals sharing identical causal RDVs displayed phenotypic discordance. While 38% of affected individuals harbored RDVs in addition to the causal mutations, their presence did not correlate with phenotypic severity. CONCLUSION: Our data offer little support for “tri-allelism” or digenicity/oligogenicity as clinically-relevant inheritance modes in JBTS. While phenotypic discordance supports the existence of genetic modifiers, identifying clinically-relevant modifiers remains challenging. 2017-08-03 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5797514/ /pubmed/28771248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.94 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Phelps, Ian G. Dempsey, Jennifer C. Grout, Megan E. Isabella, Christine R. Tully, Hannah M. Doherty, Dan Bachmann-Gagescu, Ruxandra Interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: Systematic investigation of Joubert Syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity |
title | Interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: Systematic investigation of Joubert Syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity |
title_full | Interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: Systematic investigation of Joubert Syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity |
title_fullStr | Interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: Systematic investigation of Joubert Syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity |
title_full_unstemmed | Interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: Systematic investigation of Joubert Syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity |
title_short | Interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: Systematic investigation of Joubert Syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity |
title_sort | interpreting the clinical significance of combined variants in multiple recessive disease genes: systematic investigation of joubert syndrome yields little support for oligogenicity |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5797514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28771248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.94 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT phelpsiang interpretingtheclinicalsignificanceofcombinedvariantsinmultiplerecessivediseasegenessystematicinvestigationofjoubertsyndromeyieldslittlesupportforoligogenicity AT dempseyjenniferc interpretingtheclinicalsignificanceofcombinedvariantsinmultiplerecessivediseasegenessystematicinvestigationofjoubertsyndromeyieldslittlesupportforoligogenicity AT groutmegane interpretingtheclinicalsignificanceofcombinedvariantsinmultiplerecessivediseasegenessystematicinvestigationofjoubertsyndromeyieldslittlesupportforoligogenicity AT isabellachristiner interpretingtheclinicalsignificanceofcombinedvariantsinmultiplerecessivediseasegenessystematicinvestigationofjoubertsyndromeyieldslittlesupportforoligogenicity AT tullyhannahm interpretingtheclinicalsignificanceofcombinedvariantsinmultiplerecessivediseasegenessystematicinvestigationofjoubertsyndromeyieldslittlesupportforoligogenicity AT dohertydan interpretingtheclinicalsignificanceofcombinedvariantsinmultiplerecessivediseasegenessystematicinvestigationofjoubertsyndromeyieldslittlesupportforoligogenicity AT bachmanngagescuruxandra interpretingtheclinicalsignificanceofcombinedvariantsinmultiplerecessivediseasegenessystematicinvestigationofjoubertsyndromeyieldslittlesupportforoligogenicity |