Cargando…

The “Parachute” Technique: A Simple and Effective Single-Row Procedure to Achieve an Increased Contact Area Between the Cuff-Tendon and Its Footprint

Many techniques of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair have been described. No significant differences in clinical outcomes or rerupture rates have been observed when comparing single-row with double-row methods. Not all single- and double-row repairs are the same. The details of the technique used are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Natera, Luis, Consigliere, Paolo, Witney-Lagen, Caroline, Brugera, Juan, Sforza, Giuseppe, Atoun, Ehud, Levy, Ofer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5797836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2017.07.010
_version_ 1783297761322467328
author Natera, Luis
Consigliere, Paolo
Witney-Lagen, Caroline
Brugera, Juan
Sforza, Giuseppe
Atoun, Ehud
Levy, Ofer
author_facet Natera, Luis
Consigliere, Paolo
Witney-Lagen, Caroline
Brugera, Juan
Sforza, Giuseppe
Atoun, Ehud
Levy, Ofer
author_sort Natera, Luis
collection PubMed
description Many techniques of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair have been described. No significant differences in clinical outcomes or rerupture rates have been observed when comparing single-row with double-row methods. Not all single- and double-row repairs are the same. The details of the technique used are crucial. It has been shown that the suture-tendon interface is the weakest point of the reconstruction. Therefore, the biomechanical properties of rotator cuff repairs might be influenced more by the suture configuration than by the number of anchors or by the number of rows involved. Techniques that secure less amount of tendon over a smaller area of the healing zone might be expected to have higher failure rates. The way the sutures of the “parachute technique” are configured represents a quadruple mattress that increases the contact and pressure between the tendon and its footprint and increases the primary load to failure of the repair. We present a simple and effective single-row technique that involves the biomechanical and biological advantages related to the increased contact area and pressure between the cuff and its footprint.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5797836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57978362018-02-07 The “Parachute” Technique: A Simple and Effective Single-Row Procedure to Achieve an Increased Contact Area Between the Cuff-Tendon and Its Footprint Natera, Luis Consigliere, Paolo Witney-Lagen, Caroline Brugera, Juan Sforza, Giuseppe Atoun, Ehud Levy, Ofer Arthrosc Tech Technical Note Many techniques of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair have been described. No significant differences in clinical outcomes or rerupture rates have been observed when comparing single-row with double-row methods. Not all single- and double-row repairs are the same. The details of the technique used are crucial. It has been shown that the suture-tendon interface is the weakest point of the reconstruction. Therefore, the biomechanical properties of rotator cuff repairs might be influenced more by the suture configuration than by the number of anchors or by the number of rows involved. Techniques that secure less amount of tendon over a smaller area of the healing zone might be expected to have higher failure rates. The way the sutures of the “parachute technique” are configured represents a quadruple mattress that increases the contact and pressure between the tendon and its footprint and increases the primary load to failure of the repair. We present a simple and effective single-row technique that involves the biomechanical and biological advantages related to the increased contact area and pressure between the cuff and its footprint. Elsevier 2017-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5797836/ /pubmed/29416977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2017.07.010 Text en © 2017 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Technical Note
Natera, Luis
Consigliere, Paolo
Witney-Lagen, Caroline
Brugera, Juan
Sforza, Giuseppe
Atoun, Ehud
Levy, Ofer
The “Parachute” Technique: A Simple and Effective Single-Row Procedure to Achieve an Increased Contact Area Between the Cuff-Tendon and Its Footprint
title The “Parachute” Technique: A Simple and Effective Single-Row Procedure to Achieve an Increased Contact Area Between the Cuff-Tendon and Its Footprint
title_full The “Parachute” Technique: A Simple and Effective Single-Row Procedure to Achieve an Increased Contact Area Between the Cuff-Tendon and Its Footprint
title_fullStr The “Parachute” Technique: A Simple and Effective Single-Row Procedure to Achieve an Increased Contact Area Between the Cuff-Tendon and Its Footprint
title_full_unstemmed The “Parachute” Technique: A Simple and Effective Single-Row Procedure to Achieve an Increased Contact Area Between the Cuff-Tendon and Its Footprint
title_short The “Parachute” Technique: A Simple and Effective Single-Row Procedure to Achieve an Increased Contact Area Between the Cuff-Tendon and Its Footprint
title_sort “parachute” technique: a simple and effective single-row procedure to achieve an increased contact area between the cuff-tendon and its footprint
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5797836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2017.07.010
work_keys_str_mv AT nateraluis theparachutetechniqueasimpleandeffectivesinglerowproceduretoachieveanincreasedcontactareabetweenthecufftendonanditsfootprint
AT consiglierepaolo theparachutetechniqueasimpleandeffectivesinglerowproceduretoachieveanincreasedcontactareabetweenthecufftendonanditsfootprint
AT witneylagencaroline theparachutetechniqueasimpleandeffectivesinglerowproceduretoachieveanincreasedcontactareabetweenthecufftendonanditsfootprint
AT brugerajuan theparachutetechniqueasimpleandeffectivesinglerowproceduretoachieveanincreasedcontactareabetweenthecufftendonanditsfootprint
AT sforzagiuseppe theparachutetechniqueasimpleandeffectivesinglerowproceduretoachieveanincreasedcontactareabetweenthecufftendonanditsfootprint
AT atounehud theparachutetechniqueasimpleandeffectivesinglerowproceduretoachieveanincreasedcontactareabetweenthecufftendonanditsfootprint
AT levyofer theparachutetechniqueasimpleandeffectivesinglerowproceduretoachieveanincreasedcontactareabetweenthecufftendonanditsfootprint
AT nateraluis parachutetechniqueasimpleandeffectivesinglerowproceduretoachieveanincreasedcontactareabetweenthecufftendonanditsfootprint
AT consiglierepaolo parachutetechniqueasimpleandeffectivesinglerowproceduretoachieveanincreasedcontactareabetweenthecufftendonanditsfootprint
AT witneylagencaroline parachutetechniqueasimpleandeffectivesinglerowproceduretoachieveanincreasedcontactareabetweenthecufftendonanditsfootprint
AT brugerajuan parachutetechniqueasimpleandeffectivesinglerowproceduretoachieveanincreasedcontactareabetweenthecufftendonanditsfootprint
AT sforzagiuseppe parachutetechniqueasimpleandeffectivesinglerowproceduretoachieveanincreasedcontactareabetweenthecufftendonanditsfootprint
AT atounehud parachutetechniqueasimpleandeffectivesinglerowproceduretoachieveanincreasedcontactareabetweenthecufftendonanditsfootprint
AT levyofer parachutetechniqueasimpleandeffectivesinglerowproceduretoachieveanincreasedcontactareabetweenthecufftendonanditsfootprint