Cargando…

Comparison of Left Ventricular Phase Parameters Analysis between Two Software Programs in Patients with Normal Gated Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography-Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

BACKGROUND: Phase analysis can be easily performed by different software to assess the left ventricular dyssynchrony from gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with high precision. However, the normal values of histogram bandwidth (HBW) and phase...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malik, Dharmender, Sood, Ashwani, Parmar, Madan, Mittal, Bhagwant Rai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29430109
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_119_17
_version_ 1783297809874681856
author Malik, Dharmender
Sood, Ashwani
Parmar, Madan
Mittal, Bhagwant Rai
author_facet Malik, Dharmender
Sood, Ashwani
Parmar, Madan
Mittal, Bhagwant Rai
author_sort Malik, Dharmender
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Phase analysis can be easily performed by different software to assess the left ventricular dyssynchrony from gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with high precision. However, the normal values of histogram bandwidth (HBW) and phase standard deviation (PSD) and their comparison using different programs have not been fully elucidated and actively being evaluated at present. The aim of this study was to determine the phase analysis parameters values and to compare the phase indices of two commonly used programs in a group of patients with normal gated SPECT-MPI. METHODS: Phase parameters were retrospectively evaluated in 138 consecutive nondiabetic patients having a normal gated SPECT-MPI using the quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) and Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTb) software. HBW, PSD, and phase entropy were calculated separately using both programs. RESULTS: The fair correlation between software programs was observed. HBW and PSD in QGS and ECTb were 26.20 ± 9.7 and 25.46 ± 8.0 (r-value. 56, SEE 6.65) and 6.64 ± 2.5 and 7.65 ± 2.5 (r = 0.54, SEE 2.14), respectively. The value of phase entropy in QGS program was 45.08 ± 6.3. A fair correlation between phase entropy and PSD in QGS was observed (r = 0.44, 95% confidence interval-0.29–0.56). CONCLUSION: Phase analysis parameters derived from gated SPECT-MPI in patients with normal myocardial perfusion are program dependent and may differ. The results cannot be interchangeably used in the same patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5798092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57980922018-02-09 Comparison of Left Ventricular Phase Parameters Analysis between Two Software Programs in Patients with Normal Gated Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography-Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Malik, Dharmender Sood, Ashwani Parmar, Madan Mittal, Bhagwant Rai Indian J Nucl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Phase analysis can be easily performed by different software to assess the left ventricular dyssynchrony from gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with high precision. However, the normal values of histogram bandwidth (HBW) and phase standard deviation (PSD) and their comparison using different programs have not been fully elucidated and actively being evaluated at present. The aim of this study was to determine the phase analysis parameters values and to compare the phase indices of two commonly used programs in a group of patients with normal gated SPECT-MPI. METHODS: Phase parameters were retrospectively evaluated in 138 consecutive nondiabetic patients having a normal gated SPECT-MPI using the quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) and Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTb) software. HBW, PSD, and phase entropy were calculated separately using both programs. RESULTS: The fair correlation between software programs was observed. HBW and PSD in QGS and ECTb were 26.20 ± 9.7 and 25.46 ± 8.0 (r-value. 56, SEE 6.65) and 6.64 ± 2.5 and 7.65 ± 2.5 (r = 0.54, SEE 2.14), respectively. The value of phase entropy in QGS program was 45.08 ± 6.3. A fair correlation between phase entropy and PSD in QGS was observed (r = 0.44, 95% confidence interval-0.29–0.56). CONCLUSION: Phase analysis parameters derived from gated SPECT-MPI in patients with normal myocardial perfusion are program dependent and may differ. The results cannot be interchangeably used in the same patients. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5798092/ /pubmed/29430109 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_119_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Malik, Dharmender
Sood, Ashwani
Parmar, Madan
Mittal, Bhagwant Rai
Comparison of Left Ventricular Phase Parameters Analysis between Two Software Programs in Patients with Normal Gated Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography-Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
title Comparison of Left Ventricular Phase Parameters Analysis between Two Software Programs in Patients with Normal Gated Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography-Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
title_full Comparison of Left Ventricular Phase Parameters Analysis between Two Software Programs in Patients with Normal Gated Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography-Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
title_fullStr Comparison of Left Ventricular Phase Parameters Analysis between Two Software Programs in Patients with Normal Gated Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography-Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Left Ventricular Phase Parameters Analysis between Two Software Programs in Patients with Normal Gated Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography-Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
title_short Comparison of Left Ventricular Phase Parameters Analysis between Two Software Programs in Patients with Normal Gated Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography-Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
title_sort comparison of left ventricular phase parameters analysis between two software programs in patients with normal gated single-photon emission computed tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29430109
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ijnm.IJNM_119_17
work_keys_str_mv AT malikdharmender comparisonofleftventricularphaseparametersanalysisbetweentwosoftwareprogramsinpatientswithnormalgatedsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographymyocardialperfusionimaging
AT soodashwani comparisonofleftventricularphaseparametersanalysisbetweentwosoftwareprogramsinpatientswithnormalgatedsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographymyocardialperfusionimaging
AT parmarmadan comparisonofleftventricularphaseparametersanalysisbetweentwosoftwareprogramsinpatientswithnormalgatedsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographymyocardialperfusionimaging
AT mittalbhagwantrai comparisonofleftventricularphaseparametersanalysisbetweentwosoftwareprogramsinpatientswithnormalgatedsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographymyocardialperfusionimaging