Cargando…

Correction of self-reported BMI based on objective measurements: a Belgian experience

BACKGROUND: Based on successive Health Interview Surveys (HIS), it has been demonstrated that also in Belgium obesity, measured by means of a self-reported body mass index (BMI in kg/m(2)), is a growing public health problem that needs to be monitored as accurately as possible. Studies have shown th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drieskens, S., Demarest, S., Bel, S., De Ridder, K., Tafforeau, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29441203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-018-0255-7
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Based on successive Health Interview Surveys (HIS), it has been demonstrated that also in Belgium obesity, measured by means of a self-reported body mass index (BMI in kg/m(2)), is a growing public health problem that needs to be monitored as accurately as possible. Studies have shown that a self-reported BMI can be biased. Consequently, if the aim is to rely on a self-reported BMI, adjustment is recommended. Data on measured and self-reported BMI, derived from the Belgian Food Consumption Survey (FCS) 2014 offers the opportunity to do so. METHODS: The HIS and FCS are cross-sectional surveys based on representative population samples. This study focused on adults aged 18–64 years (sample HIS = 6545 and FCS = 1213). Measured and self-reported BMI collected in FCS were used to assess possible misreporting. Using FCS data, correction factors (measured BMI/self-reported BMI) were calculated in function of a combination of background variables (region, gender, educational level and age group). Individual self-reported BMI of the HIS 2013 were then multiplied with the corresponding correction factors to produce a corrected BMI-classification. RESULTS: When compared with the measured BMI, the self-reported BMI in the FCS was underestimated (mean 0.97 kg/m(2)). 28% of the obese people underestimated their BMI. After applying the correction factors, the prevalence of obesity based on HIS data significantly increased (from 13% based on the original HIS data to 17% based on the corrected HIS data) and approximated the measured one derived from the FCS data. CONCLUSIONS: Since self-reported calculations of BMI are underestimated, it is recommended to adjust them to obtain accurate estimates which are important for decision making.