Cargando…

Correlation between urinary GAG and anti-idursulfase ERT neutralizing antibodies during treatment with NICIT immune tolerance regimen: A case report(,)

INTRODUCTION: Antibodies to intravenous idursulfase enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for patients with Hunter syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis type II, MPS II) can have a harmful clinical impact, including both increasing risk of infusion reactions and inhibiting therapeutic activity. Thus, failure t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Sarah, Whitley, Chester B., Jarnes Utz, Jeanine R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28610913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2017.06.001
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Antibodies to intravenous idursulfase enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for patients with Hunter syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis type II, MPS II) can have a harmful clinical impact, including both increasing risk of infusion reactions and inhibiting therapeutic activity. Thus, failure to monitor anti-idursulfase antibodies and neutralizing antibodies, and delays in reporting results, may postpone critical clinical decisions. HYPOTHESIS: Urinary glycosaminoglycan (GAG) levels may be used as a biomarker for anti-idursulfase antibodies and neutralizing antibodies to improve timeliness in monitoring and managing ERT. METHODS: This is a case report describing a patient with MPS II with high levels of neutralizing antibodies and worsened clinical status who was treated for five years with a non-immunosuppressive and non-cytotoxic immune tolerance (NICIT) regimen, consisting of intravenous immune globulin and frequent infusions of idursulfase. Neutralizing antibodies and total anti-idursulfase antibodies were measured by two different methods, the direct 1,9-dimethylmethylene blue (DMB) assay and cetylpyridinium chloride carbazole-borate (CPC) assay. RESULTS: Neutralizing antibodies, measured as percent inhibition of enzyme activity and also by total neutralizing antibody titer, were correlated with quantitative urinary GAG measured by DMB assay (p = 0.026, p = 0.0067), and quantitative urinary GAG by CPC assay with percent inhibition of enzyme activity by neutralizing antibodies (p = 0.0475). The NICIT regimen showed a sustained immune tolerance after five years and was well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Urinary GAG, measured by DMB assay, may be a biomarker for anti-idursulfase neutralizing antibodies and is useful for managing immune tolerance regimens for patients with MPS II who have high levels of anti-idursulfase neutralizing antibodies. This study highlights the importance of regular and frequent monitoring of urinary GAG in patients with MPS II who are receiving ERT. The NICIT regimen, with less drug toxicities, may be preferred in patients with MPS who have a high risk of infections and whose disease progresses less rapidly than some other lysosomal storage diseases, such as infantile Pompe disease.