Cargando…
Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission?
BACKGROUND: Limited resources warrant investigating models for predicting which stroke tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) patients benefit from admission to neurologic intensive care unit (neuroICU). METHODS: This model classifies patients who on day 1 of their ICU admission are predicted to re...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416573 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3283w |
_version_ | 1783297834055892992 |
---|---|
author | Sadaka, Farid Jadhav, Amar O’Brien, Jacklyn Trottier, Steven |
author_facet | Sadaka, Farid Jadhav, Amar O’Brien, Jacklyn Trottier, Steven |
author_sort | Sadaka, Farid |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Limited resources warrant investigating models for predicting which stroke tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) patients benefit from admission to neurologic intensive care unit (neuroICU). METHODS: This model classifies patients who on day 1 of their ICU admission are predicted to receive one or more of 30 subsequent active life supporting treatments. Two groups of patients were compared: low risk monitor (LRM) (patients who did not receive active treatment (AT) on the first day and whose risk of ever receiving active treatment was ≤ 10%) and AT (patients who received at least one treatment on any day of their ICU admission). RESULTS: Compared to LRM group (21 patients), AT group (59 patients) had similar age (75 ± 13 vs. 72 ± 17, P = 0.4), similar gender (male: 56% vs. 52%, P = 0.8), similar National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS, 16 ± 9 vs. 14 ± 8, P = 0.4), and higher Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III scores (62 ± 26 vs. 41 ± 15, P = 0.0008). Compared to LRM group, AT group had longer ICU length of stay (4.5 ± 4.4 vs. 2.5 ± 1.3, P = 0.04), higher ICU mortality (22% vs. 4.7% (one patient DNR/hospice); OR: 5.6; 95% CI: 0.7 - 46.0; P = 0.1), and higher hospital mortality (36% vs. 4.7%; OR: 11; 95% CI: 1.4 - 88.0; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The outcome of LRM patients with stroke post-tPA suggests that they may not require admission to a formal neuroICU, improving resource use and reducing costs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5798261 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elmer Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57982612018-02-07 Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission? Sadaka, Farid Jadhav, Amar O’Brien, Jacklyn Trottier, Steven J Clin Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Limited resources warrant investigating models for predicting which stroke tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) patients benefit from admission to neurologic intensive care unit (neuroICU). METHODS: This model classifies patients who on day 1 of their ICU admission are predicted to receive one or more of 30 subsequent active life supporting treatments. Two groups of patients were compared: low risk monitor (LRM) (patients who did not receive active treatment (AT) on the first day and whose risk of ever receiving active treatment was ≤ 10%) and AT (patients who received at least one treatment on any day of their ICU admission). RESULTS: Compared to LRM group (21 patients), AT group (59 patients) had similar age (75 ± 13 vs. 72 ± 17, P = 0.4), similar gender (male: 56% vs. 52%, P = 0.8), similar National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS, 16 ± 9 vs. 14 ± 8, P = 0.4), and higher Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III scores (62 ± 26 vs. 41 ± 15, P = 0.0008). Compared to LRM group, AT group had longer ICU length of stay (4.5 ± 4.4 vs. 2.5 ± 1.3, P = 0.04), higher ICU mortality (22% vs. 4.7% (one patient DNR/hospice); OR: 5.6; 95% CI: 0.7 - 46.0; P = 0.1), and higher hospital mortality (36% vs. 4.7%; OR: 11; 95% CI: 1.4 - 88.0; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The outcome of LRM patients with stroke post-tPA suggests that they may not require admission to a formal neuroICU, improving resource use and reducing costs. Elmer Press 2018-03 2018-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5798261/ /pubmed/29416573 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3283w Text en Copyright 2018, Sadaka et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sadaka, Farid Jadhav, Amar O’Brien, Jacklyn Trottier, Steven Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission? |
title | Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission? |
title_full | Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission? |
title_fullStr | Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission? |
title_short | Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission? |
title_sort | do all acute stroke patients receiving tpa require icu admission? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798261/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416573 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3283w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sadakafarid doallacutestrokepatientsreceivingtparequireicuadmission AT jadhavamar doallacutestrokepatientsreceivingtparequireicuadmission AT obrienjacklyn doallacutestrokepatientsreceivingtparequireicuadmission AT trottiersteven doallacutestrokepatientsreceivingtparequireicuadmission |