Cargando…

Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission?

BACKGROUND: Limited resources warrant investigating models for predicting which stroke tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) patients benefit from admission to neurologic intensive care unit (neuroICU). METHODS: This model classifies patients who on day 1 of their ICU admission are predicted to re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadaka, Farid, Jadhav, Amar, O’Brien, Jacklyn, Trottier, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416573
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3283w
_version_ 1783297834055892992
author Sadaka, Farid
Jadhav, Amar
O’Brien, Jacklyn
Trottier, Steven
author_facet Sadaka, Farid
Jadhav, Amar
O’Brien, Jacklyn
Trottier, Steven
author_sort Sadaka, Farid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Limited resources warrant investigating models for predicting which stroke tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) patients benefit from admission to neurologic intensive care unit (neuroICU). METHODS: This model classifies patients who on day 1 of their ICU admission are predicted to receive one or more of 30 subsequent active life supporting treatments. Two groups of patients were compared: low risk monitor (LRM) (patients who did not receive active treatment (AT) on the first day and whose risk of ever receiving active treatment was ≤ 10%) and AT (patients who received at least one treatment on any day of their ICU admission). RESULTS: Compared to LRM group (21 patients), AT group (59 patients) had similar age (75 ± 13 vs. 72 ± 17, P = 0.4), similar gender (male: 56% vs. 52%, P = 0.8), similar National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS, 16 ± 9 vs. 14 ± 8, P = 0.4), and higher Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III scores (62 ± 26 vs. 41 ± 15, P = 0.0008). Compared to LRM group, AT group had longer ICU length of stay (4.5 ± 4.4 vs. 2.5 ± 1.3, P = 0.04), higher ICU mortality (22% vs. 4.7% (one patient DNR/hospice); OR: 5.6; 95% CI: 0.7 - 46.0; P = 0.1), and higher hospital mortality (36% vs. 4.7%; OR: 11; 95% CI: 1.4 - 88.0; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The outcome of LRM patients with stroke post-tPA suggests that they may not require admission to a formal neuroICU, improving resource use and reducing costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5798261
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57982612018-02-07 Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission? Sadaka, Farid Jadhav, Amar O’Brien, Jacklyn Trottier, Steven J Clin Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Limited resources warrant investigating models for predicting which stroke tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA) patients benefit from admission to neurologic intensive care unit (neuroICU). METHODS: This model classifies patients who on day 1 of their ICU admission are predicted to receive one or more of 30 subsequent active life supporting treatments. Two groups of patients were compared: low risk monitor (LRM) (patients who did not receive active treatment (AT) on the first day and whose risk of ever receiving active treatment was ≤ 10%) and AT (patients who received at least one treatment on any day of their ICU admission). RESULTS: Compared to LRM group (21 patients), AT group (59 patients) had similar age (75 ± 13 vs. 72 ± 17, P = 0.4), similar gender (male: 56% vs. 52%, P = 0.8), similar National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS, 16 ± 9 vs. 14 ± 8, P = 0.4), and higher Acute Physiologic and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III scores (62 ± 26 vs. 41 ± 15, P = 0.0008). Compared to LRM group, AT group had longer ICU length of stay (4.5 ± 4.4 vs. 2.5 ± 1.3, P = 0.04), higher ICU mortality (22% vs. 4.7% (one patient DNR/hospice); OR: 5.6; 95% CI: 0.7 - 46.0; P = 0.1), and higher hospital mortality (36% vs. 4.7%; OR: 11; 95% CI: 1.4 - 88.0; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The outcome of LRM patients with stroke post-tPA suggests that they may not require admission to a formal neuroICU, improving resource use and reducing costs. Elmer Press 2018-03 2018-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5798261/ /pubmed/29416573 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3283w Text en Copyright 2018, Sadaka et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sadaka, Farid
Jadhav, Amar
O’Brien, Jacklyn
Trottier, Steven
Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission?
title Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission?
title_full Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission?
title_fullStr Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission?
title_full_unstemmed Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission?
title_short Do All Acute Stroke Patients Receiving tPA Require ICU Admission?
title_sort do all acute stroke patients receiving tpa require icu admission?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798261/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416573
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3283w
work_keys_str_mv AT sadakafarid doallacutestrokepatientsreceivingtparequireicuadmission
AT jadhavamar doallacutestrokepatientsreceivingtparequireicuadmission
AT obrienjacklyn doallacutestrokepatientsreceivingtparequireicuadmission
AT trottiersteven doallacutestrokepatientsreceivingtparequireicuadmission