Cargando…

Validation of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA)

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested to replace the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA, based on performance status and number of brain metastases) for patients with primary malignant melanoma with the new Melanoma-molGPA. The latter is a more complex assessment, which also include...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nieder, Carsten, Hintz, Mandy, Bilger, Angelika, Oehlke, Oliver, Grosu, Anca-Ligia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elmer Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416574
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3248w
_version_ 1783297834288676864
author Nieder, Carsten
Hintz, Mandy
Bilger, Angelika
Oehlke, Oliver
Grosu, Anca-Ligia
author_facet Nieder, Carsten
Hintz, Mandy
Bilger, Angelika
Oehlke, Oliver
Grosu, Anca-Ligia
author_sort Nieder, Carsten
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has been suggested to replace the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA, based on performance status and number of brain metastases) for patients with primary malignant melanoma with the new Melanoma-molGPA. The latter is a more complex assessment, which also includes BRAF mutation status, age and extracranial metastases. To test the performance of the Melanoma-molGPA, we performed a validation study of this new survival prediction tool. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients treated at two different academic institutions was performed. The four-tiered Melanoma-molGPA was calculated as suggested in the original study. RESULTS: Median overall survival was 5.4 months (95% confidence interval: 3.1 - 7.7 months). Median survival in the four prognostic classes was 2.1, 7.8, 11.8, and 18.0 months, respectively. The 1-year survival rates were 3%, 25%, 43%, and 80%, respectively. The difference between the Kaplan-Meier curves was significant (P = 0.0001, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: The present survival outcomes support the use of the Melanoma-molGPA. However, survival was better in each of the four groups in the original study. Possible reasons include lead-time bias and different treatment policies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5798262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elmer Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57982622018-02-07 Validation of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA) Nieder, Carsten Hintz, Mandy Bilger, Angelika Oehlke, Oliver Grosu, Anca-Ligia J Clin Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: It has been suggested to replace the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA, based on performance status and number of brain metastases) for patients with primary malignant melanoma with the new Melanoma-molGPA. The latter is a more complex assessment, which also includes BRAF mutation status, age and extracranial metastases. To test the performance of the Melanoma-molGPA, we performed a validation study of this new survival prediction tool. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients treated at two different academic institutions was performed. The four-tiered Melanoma-molGPA was calculated as suggested in the original study. RESULTS: Median overall survival was 5.4 months (95% confidence interval: 3.1 - 7.7 months). Median survival in the four prognostic classes was 2.1, 7.8, 11.8, and 18.0 months, respectively. The 1-year survival rates were 3%, 25%, 43%, and 80%, respectively. The difference between the Kaplan-Meier curves was significant (P = 0.0001, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: The present survival outcomes support the use of the Melanoma-molGPA. However, survival was better in each of the four groups in the original study. Possible reasons include lead-time bias and different treatment policies. Elmer Press 2018-03 2018-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5798262/ /pubmed/29416574 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3248w Text en Copyright 2018, Nieder et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nieder, Carsten
Hintz, Mandy
Bilger, Angelika
Oehlke, Oliver
Grosu, Anca-Ligia
Validation of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA)
title Validation of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA)
title_full Validation of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA)
title_fullStr Validation of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA)
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA)
title_short Validation of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA)
title_sort validation of the graded prognostic assessment for melanoma using molecular markers (melanoma-molgpa)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416574
http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3248w
work_keys_str_mv AT niedercarsten validationofthegradedprognosticassessmentformelanomausingmolecularmarkersmelanomamolgpa
AT hintzmandy validationofthegradedprognosticassessmentformelanomausingmolecularmarkersmelanomamolgpa
AT bilgerangelika validationofthegradedprognosticassessmentformelanomausingmolecularmarkersmelanomamolgpa
AT oehlkeoliver validationofthegradedprognosticassessmentformelanomausingmolecularmarkersmelanomamolgpa
AT grosuancaligia validationofthegradedprognosticassessmentformelanomausingmolecularmarkersmelanomamolgpa