Cargando…
Validation of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA)
BACKGROUND: It has been suggested to replace the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA, based on performance status and number of brain metastases) for patients with primary malignant melanoma with the new Melanoma-molGPA. The latter is a more complex assessment, which also include...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elmer Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416574 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3248w |
_version_ | 1783297834288676864 |
---|---|
author | Nieder, Carsten Hintz, Mandy Bilger, Angelika Oehlke, Oliver Grosu, Anca-Ligia |
author_facet | Nieder, Carsten Hintz, Mandy Bilger, Angelika Oehlke, Oliver Grosu, Anca-Ligia |
author_sort | Nieder, Carsten |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It has been suggested to replace the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA, based on performance status and number of brain metastases) for patients with primary malignant melanoma with the new Melanoma-molGPA. The latter is a more complex assessment, which also includes BRAF mutation status, age and extracranial metastases. To test the performance of the Melanoma-molGPA, we performed a validation study of this new survival prediction tool. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients treated at two different academic institutions was performed. The four-tiered Melanoma-molGPA was calculated as suggested in the original study. RESULTS: Median overall survival was 5.4 months (95% confidence interval: 3.1 - 7.7 months). Median survival in the four prognostic classes was 2.1, 7.8, 11.8, and 18.0 months, respectively. The 1-year survival rates were 3%, 25%, 43%, and 80%, respectively. The difference between the Kaplan-Meier curves was significant (P = 0.0001, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: The present survival outcomes support the use of the Melanoma-molGPA. However, survival was better in each of the four groups in the original study. Possible reasons include lead-time bias and different treatment policies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5798262 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elmer Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57982622018-02-07 Validation of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA) Nieder, Carsten Hintz, Mandy Bilger, Angelika Oehlke, Oliver Grosu, Anca-Ligia J Clin Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: It has been suggested to replace the diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA, based on performance status and number of brain metastases) for patients with primary malignant melanoma with the new Melanoma-molGPA. The latter is a more complex assessment, which also includes BRAF mutation status, age and extracranial metastases. To test the performance of the Melanoma-molGPA, we performed a validation study of this new survival prediction tool. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients treated at two different academic institutions was performed. The four-tiered Melanoma-molGPA was calculated as suggested in the original study. RESULTS: Median overall survival was 5.4 months (95% confidence interval: 3.1 - 7.7 months). Median survival in the four prognostic classes was 2.1, 7.8, 11.8, and 18.0 months, respectively. The 1-year survival rates were 3%, 25%, 43%, and 80%, respectively. The difference between the Kaplan-Meier curves was significant (P = 0.0001, log-rank test). CONCLUSIONS: The present survival outcomes support the use of the Melanoma-molGPA. However, survival was better in each of the four groups in the original study. Possible reasons include lead-time bias and different treatment policies. Elmer Press 2018-03 2018-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC5798262/ /pubmed/29416574 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3248w Text en Copyright 2018, Nieder et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nieder, Carsten Hintz, Mandy Bilger, Angelika Oehlke, Oliver Grosu, Anca-Ligia Validation of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA) |
title | Validation of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA) |
title_full | Validation of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA) |
title_fullStr | Validation of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA) |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA) |
title_short | Validation of the Graded Prognostic Assessment for Melanoma Using Molecular Markers (Melanoma-molGPA) |
title_sort | validation of the graded prognostic assessment for melanoma using molecular markers (melanoma-molgpa) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29416574 http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3248w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niedercarsten validationofthegradedprognosticassessmentformelanomausingmolecularmarkersmelanomamolgpa AT hintzmandy validationofthegradedprognosticassessmentformelanomausingmolecularmarkersmelanomamolgpa AT bilgerangelika validationofthegradedprognosticassessmentformelanomausingmolecularmarkersmelanomamolgpa AT oehlkeoliver validationofthegradedprognosticassessmentformelanomausingmolecularmarkersmelanomamolgpa AT grosuancaligia validationofthegradedprognosticassessmentformelanomausingmolecularmarkersmelanomamolgpa |