Cargando…

The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic valve therapy aims at target lobe volume reduction (TLVR) that is associated with improved lung function, exercise tolerance and quality of life in emphysema patients. So far, a TLVR of >350 mL was considered to be indicative of a positive response to treatment. However, it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gompelmann, D, Kontogianni, K, Schuhmann, M, Eberhardt, R, Heussel, CP, Herth, FJ
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29440884
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S152029
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic valve therapy aims at target lobe volume reduction (TLVR) that is associated with improved lung function, exercise tolerance and quality of life in emphysema patients. So far, a TLVR of >350 mL was considered to be indicative of a positive response to treatment. However, it is not really known what amount of TLVR is crucial following valve implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TLVR, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), residual volume (RV) and 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD) were assessed before and 3 months after valve implantation in 119 patients. TLVR was calculated based on computed tomography (CT) scan analysis using imaging software (Apollo; VIDA Diagnostics). Minimal important difference estimates were calculated by anchor-based and distribution-based methods. RESULTS: Patients treated with valves experienced a mean change of 0.11 L in FEV(1), −0.51 L in RV, 44 m in 6-MWD and a TLVR of 945 mL. Using a linear regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis based on two of three anchors (ΔFEV(1), ΔRV), the estimated minimal important difference for TLVR was between 890 and 1,070 mL (ie, 49%–54% of the baseline TLV). CONCLUSION: In future, a TLVR between 49% and 54% of the baseline TLV, should be used when interpreting the clinical relevance.