Cargando…

The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic valve therapy aims at target lobe volume reduction (TLVR) that is associated with improved lung function, exercise tolerance and quality of life in emphysema patients. So far, a TLVR of >350 mL was considered to be indicative of a positive response to treatment. However, it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gompelmann, D, Kontogianni, K, Schuhmann, M, Eberhardt, R, Heussel, CP, Herth, FJ
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29440884
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S152029
_version_ 1783297861699502080
author Gompelmann, D
Kontogianni, K
Schuhmann, M
Eberhardt, R
Heussel, CP
Herth, FJ
author_facet Gompelmann, D
Kontogianni, K
Schuhmann, M
Eberhardt, R
Heussel, CP
Herth, FJ
author_sort Gompelmann, D
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic valve therapy aims at target lobe volume reduction (TLVR) that is associated with improved lung function, exercise tolerance and quality of life in emphysema patients. So far, a TLVR of >350 mL was considered to be indicative of a positive response to treatment. However, it is not really known what amount of TLVR is crucial following valve implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TLVR, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), residual volume (RV) and 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD) were assessed before and 3 months after valve implantation in 119 patients. TLVR was calculated based on computed tomography (CT) scan analysis using imaging software (Apollo; VIDA Diagnostics). Minimal important difference estimates were calculated by anchor-based and distribution-based methods. RESULTS: Patients treated with valves experienced a mean change of 0.11 L in FEV(1), −0.51 L in RV, 44 m in 6-MWD and a TLVR of 945 mL. Using a linear regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis based on two of three anchors (ΔFEV(1), ΔRV), the estimated minimal important difference for TLVR was between 890 and 1,070 mL (ie, 49%–54% of the baseline TLV). CONCLUSION: In future, a TLVR between 49% and 54% of the baseline TLV, should be used when interpreting the clinical relevance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5798552
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57985522018-02-13 The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy Gompelmann, D Kontogianni, K Schuhmann, M Eberhardt, R Heussel, CP Herth, FJ Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic valve therapy aims at target lobe volume reduction (TLVR) that is associated with improved lung function, exercise tolerance and quality of life in emphysema patients. So far, a TLVR of >350 mL was considered to be indicative of a positive response to treatment. However, it is not really known what amount of TLVR is crucial following valve implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TLVR, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), residual volume (RV) and 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD) were assessed before and 3 months after valve implantation in 119 patients. TLVR was calculated based on computed tomography (CT) scan analysis using imaging software (Apollo; VIDA Diagnostics). Minimal important difference estimates were calculated by anchor-based and distribution-based methods. RESULTS: Patients treated with valves experienced a mean change of 0.11 L in FEV(1), −0.51 L in RV, 44 m in 6-MWD and a TLVR of 945 mL. Using a linear regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis based on two of three anchors (ΔFEV(1), ΔRV), the estimated minimal important difference for TLVR was between 890 and 1,070 mL (ie, 49%–54% of the baseline TLV). CONCLUSION: In future, a TLVR between 49% and 54% of the baseline TLV, should be used when interpreting the clinical relevance. Dove Medical Press 2018-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5798552/ /pubmed/29440884 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S152029 Text en © 2018 Gompelmann et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Gompelmann, D
Kontogianni, K
Schuhmann, M
Eberhardt, R
Heussel, CP
Herth, FJ
The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy
title The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy
title_full The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy
title_fullStr The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy
title_full_unstemmed The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy
title_short The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy
title_sort minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798552/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29440884
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S152029
work_keys_str_mv AT gompelmannd theminimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy
AT kontogiannik theminimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy
AT schuhmannm theminimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy
AT eberhardtr theminimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy
AT heusselcp theminimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy
AT herthfj theminimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy
AT gompelmannd minimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy
AT kontogiannik minimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy
AT schuhmannm minimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy
AT eberhardtr minimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy
AT heusselcp minimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy
AT herthfj minimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy