Cargando…
The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy
OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic valve therapy aims at target lobe volume reduction (TLVR) that is associated with improved lung function, exercise tolerance and quality of life in emphysema patients. So far, a TLVR of >350 mL was considered to be indicative of a positive response to treatment. However, it...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29440884 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S152029 |
_version_ | 1783297861699502080 |
---|---|
author | Gompelmann, D Kontogianni, K Schuhmann, M Eberhardt, R Heussel, CP Herth, FJ |
author_facet | Gompelmann, D Kontogianni, K Schuhmann, M Eberhardt, R Heussel, CP Herth, FJ |
author_sort | Gompelmann, D |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic valve therapy aims at target lobe volume reduction (TLVR) that is associated with improved lung function, exercise tolerance and quality of life in emphysema patients. So far, a TLVR of >350 mL was considered to be indicative of a positive response to treatment. However, it is not really known what amount of TLVR is crucial following valve implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TLVR, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), residual volume (RV) and 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD) were assessed before and 3 months after valve implantation in 119 patients. TLVR was calculated based on computed tomography (CT) scan analysis using imaging software (Apollo; VIDA Diagnostics). Minimal important difference estimates were calculated by anchor-based and distribution-based methods. RESULTS: Patients treated with valves experienced a mean change of 0.11 L in FEV(1), −0.51 L in RV, 44 m in 6-MWD and a TLVR of 945 mL. Using a linear regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis based on two of three anchors (ΔFEV(1), ΔRV), the estimated minimal important difference for TLVR was between 890 and 1,070 mL (ie, 49%–54% of the baseline TLV). CONCLUSION: In future, a TLVR between 49% and 54% of the baseline TLV, should be used when interpreting the clinical relevance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5798552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57985522018-02-13 The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy Gompelmann, D Kontogianni, K Schuhmann, M Eberhardt, R Heussel, CP Herth, FJ Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Original Research OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic valve therapy aims at target lobe volume reduction (TLVR) that is associated with improved lung function, exercise tolerance and quality of life in emphysema patients. So far, a TLVR of >350 mL was considered to be indicative of a positive response to treatment. However, it is not really known what amount of TLVR is crucial following valve implantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TLVR, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), residual volume (RV) and 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD) were assessed before and 3 months after valve implantation in 119 patients. TLVR was calculated based on computed tomography (CT) scan analysis using imaging software (Apollo; VIDA Diagnostics). Minimal important difference estimates were calculated by anchor-based and distribution-based methods. RESULTS: Patients treated with valves experienced a mean change of 0.11 L in FEV(1), −0.51 L in RV, 44 m in 6-MWD and a TLVR of 945 mL. Using a linear regression and receiver operating characteristic analysis based on two of three anchors (ΔFEV(1), ΔRV), the estimated minimal important difference for TLVR was between 890 and 1,070 mL (ie, 49%–54% of the baseline TLV). CONCLUSION: In future, a TLVR between 49% and 54% of the baseline TLV, should be used when interpreting the clinical relevance. Dove Medical Press 2018-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5798552/ /pubmed/29440884 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S152029 Text en © 2018 Gompelmann et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Gompelmann, D Kontogianni, K Schuhmann, M Eberhardt, R Heussel, CP Herth, FJ The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy |
title | The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy |
title_full | The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy |
title_fullStr | The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy |
title_short | The minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy |
title_sort | minimal important difference for target lobe volume reduction after endoscopic valve therapy |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29440884 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S152029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gompelmannd theminimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy AT kontogiannik theminimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy AT schuhmannm theminimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy AT eberhardtr theminimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy AT heusselcp theminimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy AT herthfj theminimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy AT gompelmannd minimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy AT kontogiannik minimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy AT schuhmannm minimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy AT eberhardtr minimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy AT heusselcp minimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy AT herthfj minimalimportantdifferencefortargetlobevolumereductionafterendoscopicvalvetherapy |