Cargando…

The graphical brain: Belief propagation and active inference

This paper considers functional integration in the brain from a computational perspective. We ask what sort of neuronal message passing is mandated by active inference—and what implications this has for context-sensitive connectivity at microscopic and macroscopic levels. In particular, we formulate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Friston, Karl J., Parr, Thomas, de Vries, Bert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MIT Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29417960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/NETN_a_00018
_version_ 1783297868162924544
author Friston, Karl J.
Parr, Thomas
de Vries, Bert
author_facet Friston, Karl J.
Parr, Thomas
de Vries, Bert
author_sort Friston, Karl J.
collection PubMed
description This paper considers functional integration in the brain from a computational perspective. We ask what sort of neuronal message passing is mandated by active inference—and what implications this has for context-sensitive connectivity at microscopic and macroscopic levels. In particular, we formulate neuronal processing as belief propagation under deep generative models. Crucially, these models can entertain both discrete and continuous states, leading to distinct schemes for belief updating that play out on the same (neuronal) architecture. Technically, we use Forney (normal) factor graphs to elucidate the requisite message passing in terms of its form and scheduling. To accommodate mixed generative models (of discrete and continuous states), one also has to consider link nodes or factors that enable discrete and continuous representations to talk to each other. When mapping the implicit computational architecture onto neuronal connectivity, several interesting features emerge. For example, Bayesian model averaging and comparison, which link discrete and continuous states, may be implemented in thalamocortical loops. These and other considerations speak to a computational connectome that is inherently state dependent and self-organizing in ways that yield to a principled (variational) account. We conclude with simulations of reading that illustrate the implicit neuronal message passing, with a special focus on how discrete (semantic) representations inform, and are informed by, continuous (visual) sampling of the sensorium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5798592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MIT Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57985922018-02-05 The graphical brain: Belief propagation and active inference Friston, Karl J. Parr, Thomas de Vries, Bert Netw Neurosci Research This paper considers functional integration in the brain from a computational perspective. We ask what sort of neuronal message passing is mandated by active inference—and what implications this has for context-sensitive connectivity at microscopic and macroscopic levels. In particular, we formulate neuronal processing as belief propagation under deep generative models. Crucially, these models can entertain both discrete and continuous states, leading to distinct schemes for belief updating that play out on the same (neuronal) architecture. Technically, we use Forney (normal) factor graphs to elucidate the requisite message passing in terms of its form and scheduling. To accommodate mixed generative models (of discrete and continuous states), one also has to consider link nodes or factors that enable discrete and continuous representations to talk to each other. When mapping the implicit computational architecture onto neuronal connectivity, several interesting features emerge. For example, Bayesian model averaging and comparison, which link discrete and continuous states, may be implemented in thalamocortical loops. These and other considerations speak to a computational connectome that is inherently state dependent and self-organizing in ways that yield to a principled (variational) account. We conclude with simulations of reading that illustrate the implicit neuronal message passing, with a special focus on how discrete (semantic) representations inform, and are informed by, continuous (visual) sampling of the sensorium. MIT Press 2017-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5798592/ /pubmed/29417960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/NETN_a_00018 Text en © 2017 Massachusetts Institute of Technology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Friston, Karl J.
Parr, Thomas
de Vries, Bert
The graphical brain: Belief propagation and active inference
title The graphical brain: Belief propagation and active inference
title_full The graphical brain: Belief propagation and active inference
title_fullStr The graphical brain: Belief propagation and active inference
title_full_unstemmed The graphical brain: Belief propagation and active inference
title_short The graphical brain: Belief propagation and active inference
title_sort graphical brain: belief propagation and active inference
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29417960
http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/NETN_a_00018
work_keys_str_mv AT fristonkarlj thegraphicalbrainbeliefpropagationandactiveinference
AT parrthomas thegraphicalbrainbeliefpropagationandactiveinference
AT devriesbert thegraphicalbrainbeliefpropagationandactiveinference
AT fristonkarlj graphicalbrainbeliefpropagationandactiveinference
AT parrthomas graphicalbrainbeliefpropagationandactiveinference
AT devriesbert graphicalbrainbeliefpropagationandactiveinference