Cargando…

Differences in risk factors for 3 types of stroke: UK prospective study and meta-analyses

OBJECTIVE: To compare associations of behavioral and related factors for incident subarachnoid hemorrhage and intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke. METHODS: A total of 712,433 Million Women Study participants without prior stroke, heart disease, or cancer reported behavioral and related fact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Price, Alison J., Wright, F. Lucy, Green, Jane, Balkwill, Angela, Kan, Sau Wan, Yang, TienYu Owen, Floud, Sarah, Kroll, Mary E., Simpson, Rachel, Sudlow, Cathie L.M., Beral, Valerie, Reeves, Gillian K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004856
_version_ 1783297872656072704
author Price, Alison J.
Wright, F. Lucy
Green, Jane
Balkwill, Angela
Kan, Sau Wan
Yang, TienYu Owen
Floud, Sarah
Kroll, Mary E.
Simpson, Rachel
Sudlow, Cathie L.M.
Beral, Valerie
Reeves, Gillian K.
author_facet Price, Alison J.
Wright, F. Lucy
Green, Jane
Balkwill, Angela
Kan, Sau Wan
Yang, TienYu Owen
Floud, Sarah
Kroll, Mary E.
Simpson, Rachel
Sudlow, Cathie L.M.
Beral, Valerie
Reeves, Gillian K.
author_sort Price, Alison J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare associations of behavioral and related factors for incident subarachnoid hemorrhage and intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke. METHODS: A total of 712,433 Million Women Study participants without prior stroke, heart disease, or cancer reported behavioral and related factors at baseline (1999–2007) and were followed up by record linkage to national hospital admission and death databases. Cox regression yielded adjusted relative risks (RRs) by type of stroke. Heterogeneity was assessed with χ(2) tests. When appropriate, meta-analyses were done of published prospective studies. RESULTS: After 12.9 (SD 2.6) years of follow-up, 8,128 women had an incident ischemic stroke, 2,032 had intracerebral hemorrhage, and 1,536 had subarachnoid hemorrhage. In women with diabetes mellitus, the risk of ischemic stroke was substantially increased (RR 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.84–2.20), risk of intracerebral hemorrhage was increased slightly (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.04–1.65), but risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage was reduced (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26–0.69) (heterogeneity by stroke type, p < 0.0001). Stroke incidence was greater in women who rated their health as poor/fair compared to those who rated their health as excellent/good (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.30–1.42). Among 565,850 women who rated their heath as excellent/good, current smokers were at an increased risk of all 3 stroke types, (although greater for subarachnoid hemorrhage [≥15 cigarettes/d vs never smoker, RR 4.75, 95% CI 4.12–5.47] than for intracerebral hemorrhage [RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.94–2.72] or ischemic stroke [RR 2.50, 95% CI 2.29–2.72]; heterogeneity p < 0.0001). Obesity was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke and a decreased risk of hemorrhagic stroke (heterogeneity p < 0.0001). Meta-analyses confirmed the associations and the heterogeneity across the 3 types of stroke. CONCLUSION: Classic risk factors for stroke have considerably different effects on the 3 main pathologic types of stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5798656
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57986562018-02-07 Differences in risk factors for 3 types of stroke: UK prospective study and meta-analyses Price, Alison J. Wright, F. Lucy Green, Jane Balkwill, Angela Kan, Sau Wan Yang, TienYu Owen Floud, Sarah Kroll, Mary E. Simpson, Rachel Sudlow, Cathie L.M. Beral, Valerie Reeves, Gillian K. Neurology Article OBJECTIVE: To compare associations of behavioral and related factors for incident subarachnoid hemorrhage and intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke. METHODS: A total of 712,433 Million Women Study participants without prior stroke, heart disease, or cancer reported behavioral and related factors at baseline (1999–2007) and were followed up by record linkage to national hospital admission and death databases. Cox regression yielded adjusted relative risks (RRs) by type of stroke. Heterogeneity was assessed with χ(2) tests. When appropriate, meta-analyses were done of published prospective studies. RESULTS: After 12.9 (SD 2.6) years of follow-up, 8,128 women had an incident ischemic stroke, 2,032 had intracerebral hemorrhage, and 1,536 had subarachnoid hemorrhage. In women with diabetes mellitus, the risk of ischemic stroke was substantially increased (RR 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.84–2.20), risk of intracerebral hemorrhage was increased slightly (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.04–1.65), but risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage was reduced (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26–0.69) (heterogeneity by stroke type, p < 0.0001). Stroke incidence was greater in women who rated their health as poor/fair compared to those who rated their health as excellent/good (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.30–1.42). Among 565,850 women who rated their heath as excellent/good, current smokers were at an increased risk of all 3 stroke types, (although greater for subarachnoid hemorrhage [≥15 cigarettes/d vs never smoker, RR 4.75, 95% CI 4.12–5.47] than for intracerebral hemorrhage [RR 2.30, 95% CI 1.94–2.72] or ischemic stroke [RR 2.50, 95% CI 2.29–2.72]; heterogeneity p < 0.0001). Obesity was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke and a decreased risk of hemorrhagic stroke (heterogeneity p < 0.0001). Meta-analyses confirmed the associations and the heterogeneity across the 3 types of stroke. CONCLUSION: Classic risk factors for stroke have considerably different effects on the 3 main pathologic types of stroke. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2018-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5798656/ /pubmed/29321237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004856 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Price, Alison J.
Wright, F. Lucy
Green, Jane
Balkwill, Angela
Kan, Sau Wan
Yang, TienYu Owen
Floud, Sarah
Kroll, Mary E.
Simpson, Rachel
Sudlow, Cathie L.M.
Beral, Valerie
Reeves, Gillian K.
Differences in risk factors for 3 types of stroke: UK prospective study and meta-analyses
title Differences in risk factors for 3 types of stroke: UK prospective study and meta-analyses
title_full Differences in risk factors for 3 types of stroke: UK prospective study and meta-analyses
title_fullStr Differences in risk factors for 3 types of stroke: UK prospective study and meta-analyses
title_full_unstemmed Differences in risk factors for 3 types of stroke: UK prospective study and meta-analyses
title_short Differences in risk factors for 3 types of stroke: UK prospective study and meta-analyses
title_sort differences in risk factors for 3 types of stroke: uk prospective study and meta-analyses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5798656/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29321237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004856
work_keys_str_mv AT pricealisonj differencesinriskfactorsfor3typesofstrokeukprospectivestudyandmetaanalyses
AT wrightflucy differencesinriskfactorsfor3typesofstrokeukprospectivestudyandmetaanalyses
AT greenjane differencesinriskfactorsfor3typesofstrokeukprospectivestudyandmetaanalyses
AT balkwillangela differencesinriskfactorsfor3typesofstrokeukprospectivestudyandmetaanalyses
AT kansauwan differencesinriskfactorsfor3typesofstrokeukprospectivestudyandmetaanalyses
AT yangtienyuowen differencesinriskfactorsfor3typesofstrokeukprospectivestudyandmetaanalyses
AT floudsarah differencesinriskfactorsfor3typesofstrokeukprospectivestudyandmetaanalyses
AT krollmarye differencesinriskfactorsfor3typesofstrokeukprospectivestudyandmetaanalyses
AT simpsonrachel differencesinriskfactorsfor3typesofstrokeukprospectivestudyandmetaanalyses
AT sudlowcathielm differencesinriskfactorsfor3typesofstrokeukprospectivestudyandmetaanalyses
AT beralvalerie differencesinriskfactorsfor3typesofstrokeukprospectivestudyandmetaanalyses
AT reevesgilliank differencesinriskfactorsfor3typesofstrokeukprospectivestudyandmetaanalyses