Cargando…

Comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods

The push-out (PO) test and the diametral compression (DC) test were performed to compare the merits of two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods. Compared with the push-out test, the disk in DC provided post-dentin bond strength measurements that were more precise. The load-displacement curv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Laikuan, Li, Yuping, Chen, Yung-Chung, Carrera, Carola A., Wu, Chong, Fok, Alex
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29403067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20891-3
_version_ 1783297988808933376
author Zhu, Laikuan
Li, Yuping
Chen, Yung-Chung
Carrera, Carola A.
Wu, Chong
Fok, Alex
author_facet Zhu, Laikuan
Li, Yuping
Chen, Yung-Chung
Carrera, Carola A.
Wu, Chong
Fok, Alex
author_sort Zhu, Laikuan
collection PubMed
description The push-out (PO) test and the diametral compression (DC) test were performed to compare the merits of two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods. Compared with the push-out test, the disk in DC provided post-dentin bond strength measurements that were more precise. The load-displacement curves from the DC test were much smoother and more linear up to the point of fracture when compared to those from the PO test. Compared to the PO test, DC is easier to perform for determining the bond strength between posts and dentin. No specimen alignment is needed in the DC test, and it produces a smaller standard deviation in the measured bond strength. The main disadvantage of the DC test, however, is that finite element analysis (FEA) is required to calculate the bond strength. The shear bond strength given by the PO test based on the simple formula is not valid, though, and the peak failure load is dependent on friction at the post-dentin interface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5799385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57993852018-02-14 Comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods Zhu, Laikuan Li, Yuping Chen, Yung-Chung Carrera, Carola A. Wu, Chong Fok, Alex Sci Rep Article The push-out (PO) test and the diametral compression (DC) test were performed to compare the merits of two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods. Compared with the push-out test, the disk in DC provided post-dentin bond strength measurements that were more precise. The load-displacement curves from the DC test were much smoother and more linear up to the point of fracture when compared to those from the PO test. Compared to the PO test, DC is easier to perform for determining the bond strength between posts and dentin. No specimen alignment is needed in the DC test, and it produces a smaller standard deviation in the measured bond strength. The main disadvantage of the DC test, however, is that finite element analysis (FEA) is required to calculate the bond strength. The shear bond strength given by the PO test based on the simple formula is not valid, though, and the peak failure load is dependent on friction at the post-dentin interface. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5799385/ /pubmed/29403067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20891-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Zhu, Laikuan
Li, Yuping
Chen, Yung-Chung
Carrera, Carola A.
Wu, Chong
Fok, Alex
Comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods
title Comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods
title_full Comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods
title_fullStr Comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods
title_short Comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods
title_sort comparison between two post-dentin bond strength measurement methods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29403067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20891-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zhulaikuan comparisonbetweentwopostdentinbondstrengthmeasurementmethods
AT liyuping comparisonbetweentwopostdentinbondstrengthmeasurementmethods
AT chenyungchung comparisonbetweentwopostdentinbondstrengthmeasurementmethods
AT carreracarolaa comparisonbetweentwopostdentinbondstrengthmeasurementmethods
AT wuchong comparisonbetweentwopostdentinbondstrengthmeasurementmethods
AT fokalex comparisonbetweentwopostdentinbondstrengthmeasurementmethods