Cargando…

Anaphylaxis in Poland: the epidemiology and direct costs

INTRODUCTION: Epidemiological data on anaphylaxis have been underestimated both in Poland and worldwide. AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of anaphylaxis in Poland, including a classification by gender, age and residential region. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data used in the analysis were derived from t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jahnz-Rozyk, Karina, Raciborski, Filip, Śliwczyński, Andrzej M., Kłak, Anna, Pinkas, Jarosław
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29422823
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pdia.2017.70361
_version_ 1783298067739443200
author Jahnz-Rozyk, Karina
Raciborski, Filip
Śliwczyński, Andrzej M.
Kłak, Anna
Pinkas, Jarosław
author_facet Jahnz-Rozyk, Karina
Raciborski, Filip
Śliwczyński, Andrzej M.
Kłak, Anna
Pinkas, Jarosław
author_sort Jahnz-Rozyk, Karina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Epidemiological data on anaphylaxis have been underestimated both in Poland and worldwide. AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of anaphylaxis in Poland, including a classification by gender, age and residential region. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data used in the analysis were derived from two sources, the National Health Fund records of healthcare services for 2008–2015 (official statistics) and a questionnaire-based survey conducted in 2015 on a sample of 305 allergists practicing in different regions of Poland. RESULTS: In 2015, 3144 people received treatment for anaphylactic shock (T78.0, T78.2, T80.5, T88.6) with an estimated prevalence rate of anaphylaxis of 8.2 per 100,000 (8.4 for females and 7.9 for males). The highest prevalence rate was found for women aged 50–54 years (14.5 per 100,000). There was a very large difference in the prevalence of anaphylaxis between rural and urban areas (13.1 vs. 0.8 per 100,000). In 2015, the Polish NHF spent PLN 3.5 million (EUR 835,000) on the management of anaphylaxis. Of the allergists surveyed, 73% had been currently managing patients who had experienced anaphylactic shock. The most common causes of anaphylaxis included insect venom (41.4%), food (29.8%) and drugs (17.4%). CONCLUSIONS: A central anaphylaxis registry should be established in Poland. This is the only approach that would allow collecting a wide range of reliable information on the cases, management and consequences of anaphylaxis. Ongoing management of patients who have experienced anaphylactic shock should be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5799754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57997542018-02-08 Anaphylaxis in Poland: the epidemiology and direct costs Jahnz-Rozyk, Karina Raciborski, Filip Śliwczyński, Andrzej M. Kłak, Anna Pinkas, Jarosław Postepy Dermatol Alergol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Epidemiological data on anaphylaxis have been underestimated both in Poland and worldwide. AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of anaphylaxis in Poland, including a classification by gender, age and residential region. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data used in the analysis were derived from two sources, the National Health Fund records of healthcare services for 2008–2015 (official statistics) and a questionnaire-based survey conducted in 2015 on a sample of 305 allergists practicing in different regions of Poland. RESULTS: In 2015, 3144 people received treatment for anaphylactic shock (T78.0, T78.2, T80.5, T88.6) with an estimated prevalence rate of anaphylaxis of 8.2 per 100,000 (8.4 for females and 7.9 for males). The highest prevalence rate was found for women aged 50–54 years (14.5 per 100,000). There was a very large difference in the prevalence of anaphylaxis between rural and urban areas (13.1 vs. 0.8 per 100,000). In 2015, the Polish NHF spent PLN 3.5 million (EUR 835,000) on the management of anaphylaxis. Of the allergists surveyed, 73% had been currently managing patients who had experienced anaphylactic shock. The most common causes of anaphylaxis included insect venom (41.4%), food (29.8%) and drugs (17.4%). CONCLUSIONS: A central anaphylaxis registry should be established in Poland. This is the only approach that would allow collecting a wide range of reliable information on the cases, management and consequences of anaphylaxis. Ongoing management of patients who have experienced anaphylactic shock should be improved. Termedia Publishing House 2017-12-31 2017-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5799754/ /pubmed/29422823 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pdia.2017.70361 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Jahnz-Rozyk, Karina
Raciborski, Filip
Śliwczyński, Andrzej M.
Kłak, Anna
Pinkas, Jarosław
Anaphylaxis in Poland: the epidemiology and direct costs
title Anaphylaxis in Poland: the epidemiology and direct costs
title_full Anaphylaxis in Poland: the epidemiology and direct costs
title_fullStr Anaphylaxis in Poland: the epidemiology and direct costs
title_full_unstemmed Anaphylaxis in Poland: the epidemiology and direct costs
title_short Anaphylaxis in Poland: the epidemiology and direct costs
title_sort anaphylaxis in poland: the epidemiology and direct costs
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29422823
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pdia.2017.70361
work_keys_str_mv AT jahnzrozykkarina anaphylaxisinpolandtheepidemiologyanddirectcosts
AT raciborskifilip anaphylaxisinpolandtheepidemiologyanddirectcosts
AT sliwczynskiandrzejm anaphylaxisinpolandtheepidemiologyanddirectcosts
AT kłakanna anaphylaxisinpolandtheepidemiologyanddirectcosts
AT pinkasjarosław anaphylaxisinpolandtheepidemiologyanddirectcosts