Cargando…

Evaluating a dementia learning community: exploratory study and research implications

BACKGROUND: Access times for, the costs and overload of hospital services are an increasingly salient issue for healthcare managers in many countries. Rising demand for hospital care has been attributed partly to unplanned admissions for older people, and among these partly to the increasing prevale...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheaff, Rod, Sherriff, Ian, Hennessy, Catherine Hagan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29402291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2894-3
_version_ 1783298091461378048
author Sheaff, Rod
Sherriff, Ian
Hennessy, Catherine Hagan
author_facet Sheaff, Rod
Sherriff, Ian
Hennessy, Catherine Hagan
author_sort Sheaff, Rod
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Access times for, the costs and overload of hospital services are an increasingly salient issue for healthcare managers in many countries. Rising demand for hospital care has been attributed partly to unplanned admissions for older people, and among these partly to the increasing prevalence of dementia. The paper makes a preliminary evaluation of the logic model of a Dementia Learning Community (DLC) intended to reduce unplanned hospital admissions from care homes of people with dementia. A dementia champion in each DLC care home trained other staff in dementia awareness and change management with the aims of changing work routines, improving quality of life, and reducing demands on external services. METHODS: Controlled mixed methods realistic evaluation comparing 13 intervention homes with 10 controls in England during 2013–15. Each link in the assumed logic model was tested to find whether that link appeared to exist in the DLC sites, and if so whether its effects appeared greater there than in control sites, in terms of selected indicators of quality of life (DCM Well/Ill-Being, QUALID, end-of-life planning); and impacts on ambulance call-outs and hospital admissions. RESULTS: The training was implemented as planned, and triggered cycles of Plan-Do-Study-Act activity in all the intervention care homes. Residents’ well-being scores, measured by dementia care mapping, improved markedly in half of the intervention homes but not in the other half, where indeed some scores deteriorated markedly. Most other care quality indicators studied did not significantly improve during the study period. Neither did ambulance call-out or emergency hospital admission rates. CONCLUSIONS: PDSA cycles appeared to be the more ‘active ingredient’ in this intervention. The reasons why they impacted on well-being in half of the intervention sites, and not the others, require further research. A larger, longer study would be necessary to measure definitively any impacts on unplanned hospital admissions. Our evidence suggested revising the DLC logic model to include care planning and staff familiarisation with residents’ personal histories and needs as steps towards improving residents’ quality of life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5799896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57998962018-02-13 Evaluating a dementia learning community: exploratory study and research implications Sheaff, Rod Sherriff, Ian Hennessy, Catherine Hagan BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Access times for, the costs and overload of hospital services are an increasingly salient issue for healthcare managers in many countries. Rising demand for hospital care has been attributed partly to unplanned admissions for older people, and among these partly to the increasing prevalence of dementia. The paper makes a preliminary evaluation of the logic model of a Dementia Learning Community (DLC) intended to reduce unplanned hospital admissions from care homes of people with dementia. A dementia champion in each DLC care home trained other staff in dementia awareness and change management with the aims of changing work routines, improving quality of life, and reducing demands on external services. METHODS: Controlled mixed methods realistic evaluation comparing 13 intervention homes with 10 controls in England during 2013–15. Each link in the assumed logic model was tested to find whether that link appeared to exist in the DLC sites, and if so whether its effects appeared greater there than in control sites, in terms of selected indicators of quality of life (DCM Well/Ill-Being, QUALID, end-of-life planning); and impacts on ambulance call-outs and hospital admissions. RESULTS: The training was implemented as planned, and triggered cycles of Plan-Do-Study-Act activity in all the intervention care homes. Residents’ well-being scores, measured by dementia care mapping, improved markedly in half of the intervention homes but not in the other half, where indeed some scores deteriorated markedly. Most other care quality indicators studied did not significantly improve during the study period. Neither did ambulance call-out or emergency hospital admission rates. CONCLUSIONS: PDSA cycles appeared to be the more ‘active ingredient’ in this intervention. The reasons why they impacted on well-being in half of the intervention sites, and not the others, require further research. A larger, longer study would be necessary to measure definitively any impacts on unplanned hospital admissions. Our evidence suggested revising the DLC logic model to include care planning and staff familiarisation with residents’ personal histories and needs as steps towards improving residents’ quality of life. BioMed Central 2018-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5799896/ /pubmed/29402291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2894-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sheaff, Rod
Sherriff, Ian
Hennessy, Catherine Hagan
Evaluating a dementia learning community: exploratory study and research implications
title Evaluating a dementia learning community: exploratory study and research implications
title_full Evaluating a dementia learning community: exploratory study and research implications
title_fullStr Evaluating a dementia learning community: exploratory study and research implications
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating a dementia learning community: exploratory study and research implications
title_short Evaluating a dementia learning community: exploratory study and research implications
title_sort evaluating a dementia learning community: exploratory study and research implications
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29402291
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2894-3
work_keys_str_mv AT sheaffrod evaluatingadementialearningcommunityexploratorystudyandresearchimplications
AT sherriffian evaluatingadementialearningcommunityexploratorystudyandresearchimplications
AT hennessycatherinehagan evaluatingadementialearningcommunityexploratorystudyandresearchimplications