Cargando…

Prevalence of Cytogenetic Anomalies in Couples with Recurrent Miscarriages: A Case–control Study

BACKGROUND: About 15%–20% of couples get affected by recurrent miscarriages (RM) and chromosomal abnormality in one partner affects 3%–6% of RM couples. AIMS: The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of cytogenetic anomalies in couples with RM. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A case–control study wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kalotra, Vishali, Lall, Meena, Saviour, Pushpa, Verma, Ishwar Chander, Kaur, Anupam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29430159
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_68_17
_version_ 1783298101071577088
author Kalotra, Vishali
Lall, Meena
Saviour, Pushpa
Verma, Ishwar Chander
Kaur, Anupam
author_facet Kalotra, Vishali
Lall, Meena
Saviour, Pushpa
Verma, Ishwar Chander
Kaur, Anupam
author_sort Kalotra, Vishali
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: About 15%–20% of couples get affected by recurrent miscarriages (RM) and chromosomal abnormality in one partner affects 3%–6% of RM couples. AIMS: The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of cytogenetic anomalies in couples with RM. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A case–control study was undertaken, in which 243 couples who had experienced 2 or >2 miscarriages were investigated for chromosomal abnormalities and compared with 208 healthy, age-matched control couples who had at least one healthy live born and no history of miscarriages. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Peripheral blood (PB) lymphocytes were cultured using PB-Max Karyotyping medium (GIBCO) for chromosomal analysis and 20 metaphases were analyzed for each individual. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Student's t-test was used for statistical evaluation and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all instances. RESULTS: The current study revealed 3.1% RM cases showing structural chromosomal aberrations, of which balanced translocations and Robertsonian translocations constituted 66.7% and 26.7% cases, respectively, while inversions constituted 6.7% abnormal RM cases. Polymorphic variations were observed in 1.9% RM patients and 1.2% controls as well. However, the number of abortions were significantly more (P = 0.027) in male carriers of balanced translocations as compared to female carriers in the RM group. There was no significant difference for age (P = 0.539) between RM women and control women. CONCLUSIONS: Although similar studies exist in literature, our study is the first of its kind from our region that has compared the chromosomal anomalies between the RM group and the control group. We observed 3.1% of balanced translocations and an increased number (though nonsignificant) of polymorphic variations and satellite associations in the RM group as compared to the control group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5799936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57999362018-02-09 Prevalence of Cytogenetic Anomalies in Couples with Recurrent Miscarriages: A Case–control Study Kalotra, Vishali Lall, Meena Saviour, Pushpa Verma, Ishwar Chander Kaur, Anupam J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: About 15%–20% of couples get affected by recurrent miscarriages (RM) and chromosomal abnormality in one partner affects 3%–6% of RM couples. AIMS: The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of cytogenetic anomalies in couples with RM. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A case–control study was undertaken, in which 243 couples who had experienced 2 or >2 miscarriages were investigated for chromosomal abnormalities and compared with 208 healthy, age-matched control couples who had at least one healthy live born and no history of miscarriages. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Peripheral blood (PB) lymphocytes were cultured using PB-Max Karyotyping medium (GIBCO) for chromosomal analysis and 20 metaphases were analyzed for each individual. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Student's t-test was used for statistical evaluation and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all instances. RESULTS: The current study revealed 3.1% RM cases showing structural chromosomal aberrations, of which balanced translocations and Robertsonian translocations constituted 66.7% and 26.7% cases, respectively, while inversions constituted 6.7% abnormal RM cases. Polymorphic variations were observed in 1.9% RM patients and 1.2% controls as well. However, the number of abortions were significantly more (P = 0.027) in male carriers of balanced translocations as compared to female carriers in the RM group. There was no significant difference for age (P = 0.539) between RM women and control women. CONCLUSIONS: Although similar studies exist in literature, our study is the first of its kind from our region that has compared the chromosomal anomalies between the RM group and the control group. We observed 3.1% of balanced translocations and an increased number (though nonsignificant) of polymorphic variations and satellite associations in the RM group as compared to the control group. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5799936/ /pubmed/29430159 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_68_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kalotra, Vishali
Lall, Meena
Saviour, Pushpa
Verma, Ishwar Chander
Kaur, Anupam
Prevalence of Cytogenetic Anomalies in Couples with Recurrent Miscarriages: A Case–control Study
title Prevalence of Cytogenetic Anomalies in Couples with Recurrent Miscarriages: A Case–control Study
title_full Prevalence of Cytogenetic Anomalies in Couples with Recurrent Miscarriages: A Case–control Study
title_fullStr Prevalence of Cytogenetic Anomalies in Couples with Recurrent Miscarriages: A Case–control Study
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Cytogenetic Anomalies in Couples with Recurrent Miscarriages: A Case–control Study
title_short Prevalence of Cytogenetic Anomalies in Couples with Recurrent Miscarriages: A Case–control Study
title_sort prevalence of cytogenetic anomalies in couples with recurrent miscarriages: a case–control study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29430159
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_68_17
work_keys_str_mv AT kalotravishali prevalenceofcytogeneticanomaliesincoupleswithrecurrentmiscarriagesacasecontrolstudy
AT lallmeena prevalenceofcytogeneticanomaliesincoupleswithrecurrentmiscarriagesacasecontrolstudy
AT saviourpushpa prevalenceofcytogeneticanomaliesincoupleswithrecurrentmiscarriagesacasecontrolstudy
AT vermaishwarchander prevalenceofcytogeneticanomaliesincoupleswithrecurrentmiscarriagesacasecontrolstudy
AT kauranupam prevalenceofcytogeneticanomaliesincoupleswithrecurrentmiscarriagesacasecontrolstudy