Cargando…
Clinical evaluation of flowable resin composite versus conventional resin composite in carious and noncarious lesions: Systematic review and meta-analysis
The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate clinical performance of flowable composite in carious and noncarious lesions. An electronic search was conducted using specific databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and LILACS) through March 2017. Clinical trials for restoration of cariou...
Autores principales: | Shaalan, Omar Osama, Abou-Auf, Eman, El Zoghby, Amira Farid |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5799981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29430087 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_226_17 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Clinical evaluation of self-adhering flowable composite versus conventional flowable composite in conservative Class I cavities: Randomized controlled trial
por: Shaalan, Omar Osama, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
A 24-Month Evaluation of Self-Adhering Flowable Composite Compared to Conventional Flowable Composite in Conservative Simple Occlusal Restorations: A Randomized Clinical Trial
por: Shaalan, Omar Osama, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, flowable composite, and polyacid-modified resin composite in noncarious cervical lesions: One-year follow-up
por: Hussainy, Syed Nazia, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Comparison of composite resin and porcelain inlays for restoration of noncarious cervical lesions: An In vitro study
por: Chee, Hui Theng, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Effectiveness of different resin composite materials for repairing noncarious amalgam margin defects
por: Gumustas, Burak, et al.
Publicado: (2018)