Cargando…

Breeding consequences of flavivirus infection in the collared flycatcher

BACKGROUND: The breeding consequences of virus infections have rarely been studied in avian natural breeding populations. In this paper we investigated the links between humoral immunity following a natural flavivirus infection and reproduction in a wild bird population of collared flycatcher (Ficed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strand, Tanja M., Lundkvist, Åke, Olsen, Björn, Gustafsson, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29402209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1121-5
_version_ 1783298118624739328
author Strand, Tanja M.
Lundkvist, Åke
Olsen, Björn
Gustafsson, Lars
author_facet Strand, Tanja M.
Lundkvist, Åke
Olsen, Björn
Gustafsson, Lars
author_sort Strand, Tanja M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The breeding consequences of virus infections have rarely been studied in avian natural breeding populations. In this paper we investigated the links between humoral immunity following a natural flavivirus infection and reproduction in a wild bird population of collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). We analyzed plasma from 744 birds for antibodies and correlated these results to a number of reproductive components. RESULTS: Nearly one third (27.8%) of the sampled collared flycatchers were found seropositive for flavivirus. Males had significantly more frequently flavivirus antibodies (32.3%) than females (25.1%). Seropositive females differed significantly from seronegative females in four traits: they had earlier lay date, higher body weight, higher survival rate and were older than seronegative females. The females did not differ in clutch size, number of fledged young or number of recruited young. Seropositive males had female partners with earlier lay date, i.e. the males bred earlier and they also produced more fledged young than seronegative males. In contrast, the males did not differ in clutch size, number of recruited young, male weight, age or survival. Interestingly, seropositive males had larger ornament, forehead badge size, than seronegative males. CONCLUSIONS: Collared flycatchers with an antibody response against flavivirus were more successful than birds with no antibody response, for any of the measured life history traits. The positive link between flavivirus antibody presence and life-history trait levels suggest that it is condition dependent in the collared flycatcher.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5800009
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58000092018-02-13 Breeding consequences of flavivirus infection in the collared flycatcher Strand, Tanja M. Lundkvist, Åke Olsen, Björn Gustafsson, Lars BMC Evol Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The breeding consequences of virus infections have rarely been studied in avian natural breeding populations. In this paper we investigated the links between humoral immunity following a natural flavivirus infection and reproduction in a wild bird population of collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis). We analyzed plasma from 744 birds for antibodies and correlated these results to a number of reproductive components. RESULTS: Nearly one third (27.8%) of the sampled collared flycatchers were found seropositive for flavivirus. Males had significantly more frequently flavivirus antibodies (32.3%) than females (25.1%). Seropositive females differed significantly from seronegative females in four traits: they had earlier lay date, higher body weight, higher survival rate and were older than seronegative females. The females did not differ in clutch size, number of fledged young or number of recruited young. Seropositive males had female partners with earlier lay date, i.e. the males bred earlier and they also produced more fledged young than seronegative males. In contrast, the males did not differ in clutch size, number of recruited young, male weight, age or survival. Interestingly, seropositive males had larger ornament, forehead badge size, than seronegative males. CONCLUSIONS: Collared flycatchers with an antibody response against flavivirus were more successful than birds with no antibody response, for any of the measured life history traits. The positive link between flavivirus antibody presence and life-history trait levels suggest that it is condition dependent in the collared flycatcher. BioMed Central 2018-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5800009/ /pubmed/29402209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1121-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Strand, Tanja M.
Lundkvist, Åke
Olsen, Björn
Gustafsson, Lars
Breeding consequences of flavivirus infection in the collared flycatcher
title Breeding consequences of flavivirus infection in the collared flycatcher
title_full Breeding consequences of flavivirus infection in the collared flycatcher
title_fullStr Breeding consequences of flavivirus infection in the collared flycatcher
title_full_unstemmed Breeding consequences of flavivirus infection in the collared flycatcher
title_short Breeding consequences of flavivirus infection in the collared flycatcher
title_sort breeding consequences of flavivirus infection in the collared flycatcher
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800009/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29402209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1121-5
work_keys_str_mv AT strandtanjam breedingconsequencesofflavivirusinfectioninthecollaredflycatcher
AT lundkvistake breedingconsequencesofflavivirusinfectioninthecollaredflycatcher
AT olsenbjorn breedingconsequencesofflavivirusinfectioninthecollaredflycatcher
AT gustafssonlars breedingconsequencesofflavivirusinfectioninthecollaredflycatcher