Cargando…

Makes FLASH the difference between the intervention group and the treatment-as-usual group in an evaluation study of a structured education and treatment programme for flash glucose monitoring devices in people with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: People with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy need sufficient glycaemic control to prevent the onset or progression of diabetic complications. The burden of multiple daily blood glucose self-testing can be lessened by novel diabetes technology like flash glucose monitoring systems wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schipfer, Melanie, Albrecht, Carmen, Ehrmann, Dominic, Haak, Thomas, Kulzer, Bernd, Hermanns, Norbert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29402319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2479-9
_version_ 1783298126051803136
author Schipfer, Melanie
Albrecht, Carmen
Ehrmann, Dominic
Haak, Thomas
Kulzer, Bernd
Hermanns, Norbert
author_facet Schipfer, Melanie
Albrecht, Carmen
Ehrmann, Dominic
Haak, Thomas
Kulzer, Bernd
Hermanns, Norbert
author_sort Schipfer, Melanie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: People with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy need sufficient glycaemic control to prevent the onset or progression of diabetic complications. The burden of multiple daily blood glucose self-testing can be lessened by novel diabetes technology like flash glucose monitoring systems which provide more information compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose. Despite this delivered additional information studies are showing no significant effect on HbA(1c) reduction, but a reduced time spent in a hypoglycaemic glucose range. We assume that users of these devices need additional education and training to integrate the delivered information into treatment decisions. Therefore, FLASH, an education and treatment programme, was developed. The programme evaluation follows herein. METHODS/DESIGN: Patients are recruited through 40 diabetes outpatient study centres located across Germany. They will be randomly assigned to participate in the education and treatment programme (intervention group) or to obtain treatment as usual (control group). All patients have to give blood samples and to answer a bench of questionnaires during baseline assessment, at the end of the intervention, and 6 months after the end of the intervention. Physicians will be asked to declare some additional clinical data (such as details of the diabetes therapy) for every patient at every one of the three assessment points. DISCUSSION: This study is conducted as a randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that the newly developed education and treatment programme combined with the use of a flash glucose monitoring device (intervention group) is superior to reduce HbA(1c) compared to the use of flash glucose monitoring alone (control group). The first results will be expected in 2018. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03175315. Registered on 2 May 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2479-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5800040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58000402018-02-13 Makes FLASH the difference between the intervention group and the treatment-as-usual group in an evaluation study of a structured education and treatment programme for flash glucose monitoring devices in people with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial Schipfer, Melanie Albrecht, Carmen Ehrmann, Dominic Haak, Thomas Kulzer, Bernd Hermanns, Norbert Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: People with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy need sufficient glycaemic control to prevent the onset or progression of diabetic complications. The burden of multiple daily blood glucose self-testing can be lessened by novel diabetes technology like flash glucose monitoring systems which provide more information compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose. Despite this delivered additional information studies are showing no significant effect on HbA(1c) reduction, but a reduced time spent in a hypoglycaemic glucose range. We assume that users of these devices need additional education and training to integrate the delivered information into treatment decisions. Therefore, FLASH, an education and treatment programme, was developed. The programme evaluation follows herein. METHODS/DESIGN: Patients are recruited through 40 diabetes outpatient study centres located across Germany. They will be randomly assigned to participate in the education and treatment programme (intervention group) or to obtain treatment as usual (control group). All patients have to give blood samples and to answer a bench of questionnaires during baseline assessment, at the end of the intervention, and 6 months after the end of the intervention. Physicians will be asked to declare some additional clinical data (such as details of the diabetes therapy) for every patient at every one of the three assessment points. DISCUSSION: This study is conducted as a randomised controlled trial to test the hypothesis that the newly developed education and treatment programme combined with the use of a flash glucose monitoring device (intervention group) is superior to reduce HbA(1c) compared to the use of flash glucose monitoring alone (control group). The first results will be expected in 2018. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03175315. Registered on 2 May 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2479-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5800040/ /pubmed/29402319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2479-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Schipfer, Melanie
Albrecht, Carmen
Ehrmann, Dominic
Haak, Thomas
Kulzer, Bernd
Hermanns, Norbert
Makes FLASH the difference between the intervention group and the treatment-as-usual group in an evaluation study of a structured education and treatment programme for flash glucose monitoring devices in people with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title Makes FLASH the difference between the intervention group and the treatment-as-usual group in an evaluation study of a structured education and treatment programme for flash glucose monitoring devices in people with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full Makes FLASH the difference between the intervention group and the treatment-as-usual group in an evaluation study of a structured education and treatment programme for flash glucose monitoring devices in people with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Makes FLASH the difference between the intervention group and the treatment-as-usual group in an evaluation study of a structured education and treatment programme for flash glucose monitoring devices in people with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Makes FLASH the difference between the intervention group and the treatment-as-usual group in an evaluation study of a structured education and treatment programme for flash glucose monitoring devices in people with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_short Makes FLASH the difference between the intervention group and the treatment-as-usual group in an evaluation study of a structured education and treatment programme for flash glucose monitoring devices in people with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
title_sort makes flash the difference between the intervention group and the treatment-as-usual group in an evaluation study of a structured education and treatment programme for flash glucose monitoring devices in people with diabetes on intensive insulin therapy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29402319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2479-9
work_keys_str_mv AT schipfermelanie makesflashthedifferencebetweentheinterventiongroupandthetreatmentasusualgroupinanevaluationstudyofastructurededucationandtreatmentprogrammeforflashglucosemonitoringdevicesinpeoplewithdiabetesonintensiveinsulintherapystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtr
AT albrechtcarmen makesflashthedifferencebetweentheinterventiongroupandthetreatmentasusualgroupinanevaluationstudyofastructurededucationandtreatmentprogrammeforflashglucosemonitoringdevicesinpeoplewithdiabetesonintensiveinsulintherapystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtr
AT ehrmanndominic makesflashthedifferencebetweentheinterventiongroupandthetreatmentasusualgroupinanevaluationstudyofastructurededucationandtreatmentprogrammeforflashglucosemonitoringdevicesinpeoplewithdiabetesonintensiveinsulintherapystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtr
AT haakthomas makesflashthedifferencebetweentheinterventiongroupandthetreatmentasusualgroupinanevaluationstudyofastructurededucationandtreatmentprogrammeforflashglucosemonitoringdevicesinpeoplewithdiabetesonintensiveinsulintherapystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtr
AT kulzerbernd makesflashthedifferencebetweentheinterventiongroupandthetreatmentasusualgroupinanevaluationstudyofastructurededucationandtreatmentprogrammeforflashglucosemonitoringdevicesinpeoplewithdiabetesonintensiveinsulintherapystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtr
AT hermannsnorbert makesflashthedifferencebetweentheinterventiongroupandthetreatmentasusualgroupinanevaluationstudyofastructurededucationandtreatmentprogrammeforflashglucosemonitoringdevicesinpeoplewithdiabetesonintensiveinsulintherapystudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtr