Cargando…

High prevalence of malaria in a non-endemic setting: comparison of diagnostic tools and patient outcome during a four-year survey (2013–2017)

BACKGROUND: Malaria is no longer endemic in Italy since 1970 when the World Health Organization declared Italy malaria-free, but it is now the most commonly imported disease. The aim of the study was to analyse the trend of imported malaria cases in Parma, Italy, during January 2013–June 2017, repor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Calderaro, Adriana, Piccolo, Giovanna, Montecchini, Sara, Buttrini, Mirko, Rossi, Sabina, Dell’Anna, Maria Loretana, De Remigis, Valeria, Arcangeletti, Maria Cristina, Chezzi, Carlo, De Conto, Flora
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29402283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2218-4
_version_ 1783298140997156864
author Calderaro, Adriana
Piccolo, Giovanna
Montecchini, Sara
Buttrini, Mirko
Rossi, Sabina
Dell’Anna, Maria Loretana
De Remigis, Valeria
Arcangeletti, Maria Cristina
Chezzi, Carlo
De Conto, Flora
author_facet Calderaro, Adriana
Piccolo, Giovanna
Montecchini, Sara
Buttrini, Mirko
Rossi, Sabina
Dell’Anna, Maria Loretana
De Remigis, Valeria
Arcangeletti, Maria Cristina
Chezzi, Carlo
De Conto, Flora
author_sort Calderaro, Adriana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Malaria is no longer endemic in Italy since 1970 when the World Health Organization declared Italy malaria-free, but it is now the most commonly imported disease. The aim of the study was to analyse the trend of imported malaria cases in Parma, Italy, during January 2013–June 2017, reporting also the treatment and the outcome of cases, exploring the comparison of the three diagnostic tests used for malaria diagnosis: microscopy, immunochromatographic assay (ICT) (BinaxNOW(®)) and Real-time PCR assays detecting Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium ovale curtisi, Plasmodium ovale wallikeri, and Plasmodium knowlesi. RESULTS: Of the 288 patients with suspected malaria, 87 were positive by microscopy: 73 P. falciparum, 2 P. vivax, 8 P. ovale, 1 P. vivax/P. ovale, 1 P. malariae and 2 Plasmodium sp. All samples were positive by ICT except 6. Plasmodial DNA was revealed in the 87 cases and in 2 additional cases showing P. falciparum-specific bands by ICT, as follows: 75 P. falciparum, 2 P. vivax, 6 P. ovale curtisi, 3 P. ovale wallikeri, 1 P. malariae, and 2 mixed infections. 72 patients were foreigners and 17 Italians travelling for tourism or business. The majority of these patients presented with fever at blood collection and did not have chemoprophylaxis. No fatal cases were observed and the drug mostly used was quinine observing a negative blood smear or a parasitaemia < 0.001% after 48–72 h’ therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows an update and a thorough analysis of imported malaria cases in the area of Parma during 4.5 years from the point of view of the total case management, clinical and diagnostic. The prevalence of malaria in such area in the considered period was especially due to immigrants mostly from Africa. Molecular methods were more sensitive and specific than microscopy and ICT, both detecting additional cases of P. falciparum malaria missed by microscopy and correctly identifying the Plasmodium species of medical interest. The data reported in this study may stimulate the clinicians in non-endemic areas to suspect malaria also in cases, where the most typical symptoms are absent, and the parasitologists to confirm the results of microscopy, remaining the reference method, with molecular methods to avoid misdiagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5800101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58001012018-02-13 High prevalence of malaria in a non-endemic setting: comparison of diagnostic tools and patient outcome during a four-year survey (2013–2017) Calderaro, Adriana Piccolo, Giovanna Montecchini, Sara Buttrini, Mirko Rossi, Sabina Dell’Anna, Maria Loretana De Remigis, Valeria Arcangeletti, Maria Cristina Chezzi, Carlo De Conto, Flora Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Malaria is no longer endemic in Italy since 1970 when the World Health Organization declared Italy malaria-free, but it is now the most commonly imported disease. The aim of the study was to analyse the trend of imported malaria cases in Parma, Italy, during January 2013–June 2017, reporting also the treatment and the outcome of cases, exploring the comparison of the three diagnostic tests used for malaria diagnosis: microscopy, immunochromatographic assay (ICT) (BinaxNOW(®)) and Real-time PCR assays detecting Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium malariae, Plasmodium ovale curtisi, Plasmodium ovale wallikeri, and Plasmodium knowlesi. RESULTS: Of the 288 patients with suspected malaria, 87 were positive by microscopy: 73 P. falciparum, 2 P. vivax, 8 P. ovale, 1 P. vivax/P. ovale, 1 P. malariae and 2 Plasmodium sp. All samples were positive by ICT except 6. Plasmodial DNA was revealed in the 87 cases and in 2 additional cases showing P. falciparum-specific bands by ICT, as follows: 75 P. falciparum, 2 P. vivax, 6 P. ovale curtisi, 3 P. ovale wallikeri, 1 P. malariae, and 2 mixed infections. 72 patients were foreigners and 17 Italians travelling for tourism or business. The majority of these patients presented with fever at blood collection and did not have chemoprophylaxis. No fatal cases were observed and the drug mostly used was quinine observing a negative blood smear or a parasitaemia < 0.001% after 48–72 h’ therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows an update and a thorough analysis of imported malaria cases in the area of Parma during 4.5 years from the point of view of the total case management, clinical and diagnostic. The prevalence of malaria in such area in the considered period was especially due to immigrants mostly from Africa. Molecular methods were more sensitive and specific than microscopy and ICT, both detecting additional cases of P. falciparum malaria missed by microscopy and correctly identifying the Plasmodium species of medical interest. The data reported in this study may stimulate the clinicians in non-endemic areas to suspect malaria also in cases, where the most typical symptoms are absent, and the parasitologists to confirm the results of microscopy, remaining the reference method, with molecular methods to avoid misdiagnosis. BioMed Central 2018-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5800101/ /pubmed/29402283 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2218-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Calderaro, Adriana
Piccolo, Giovanna
Montecchini, Sara
Buttrini, Mirko
Rossi, Sabina
Dell’Anna, Maria Loretana
De Remigis, Valeria
Arcangeletti, Maria Cristina
Chezzi, Carlo
De Conto, Flora
High prevalence of malaria in a non-endemic setting: comparison of diagnostic tools and patient outcome during a four-year survey (2013–2017)
title High prevalence of malaria in a non-endemic setting: comparison of diagnostic tools and patient outcome during a four-year survey (2013–2017)
title_full High prevalence of malaria in a non-endemic setting: comparison of diagnostic tools and patient outcome during a four-year survey (2013–2017)
title_fullStr High prevalence of malaria in a non-endemic setting: comparison of diagnostic tools and patient outcome during a four-year survey (2013–2017)
title_full_unstemmed High prevalence of malaria in a non-endemic setting: comparison of diagnostic tools and patient outcome during a four-year survey (2013–2017)
title_short High prevalence of malaria in a non-endemic setting: comparison of diagnostic tools and patient outcome during a four-year survey (2013–2017)
title_sort high prevalence of malaria in a non-endemic setting: comparison of diagnostic tools and patient outcome during a four-year survey (2013–2017)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29402283
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2218-4
work_keys_str_mv AT calderaroadriana highprevalenceofmalariainanonendemicsettingcomparisonofdiagnostictoolsandpatientoutcomeduringafouryearsurvey20132017
AT piccologiovanna highprevalenceofmalariainanonendemicsettingcomparisonofdiagnostictoolsandpatientoutcomeduringafouryearsurvey20132017
AT montecchinisara highprevalenceofmalariainanonendemicsettingcomparisonofdiagnostictoolsandpatientoutcomeduringafouryearsurvey20132017
AT buttrinimirko highprevalenceofmalariainanonendemicsettingcomparisonofdiagnostictoolsandpatientoutcomeduringafouryearsurvey20132017
AT rossisabina highprevalenceofmalariainanonendemicsettingcomparisonofdiagnostictoolsandpatientoutcomeduringafouryearsurvey20132017
AT dellannamarialoretana highprevalenceofmalariainanonendemicsettingcomparisonofdiagnostictoolsandpatientoutcomeduringafouryearsurvey20132017
AT deremigisvaleria highprevalenceofmalariainanonendemicsettingcomparisonofdiagnostictoolsandpatientoutcomeduringafouryearsurvey20132017
AT arcangelettimariacristina highprevalenceofmalariainanonendemicsettingcomparisonofdiagnostictoolsandpatientoutcomeduringafouryearsurvey20132017
AT chezzicarlo highprevalenceofmalariainanonendemicsettingcomparisonofdiagnostictoolsandpatientoutcomeduringafouryearsurvey20132017
AT decontoflora highprevalenceofmalariainanonendemicsettingcomparisonofdiagnostictoolsandpatientoutcomeduringafouryearsurvey20132017