Cargando…

Evaluation of Well Designs to Improve Access to Safe and Clean Water in Rural Tanzania

The objective of this study was to examine three well designs: drilled wells (20–30 m deep), closed dug wells (>5 m deep), and hand-dug open wells (<5 m deep), to determine the water quality for improving access to safe and clean water in rural communities. Heterotrophic plate count (HPC), tot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kilungo, Aminata, Powers, Linda, Arnold, Nathan, Whelan, Kelli, Paterson, Kurt, Young, Dale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29300305
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010064
_version_ 1783298156053659648
author Kilungo, Aminata
Powers, Linda
Arnold, Nathan
Whelan, Kelli
Paterson, Kurt
Young, Dale
author_facet Kilungo, Aminata
Powers, Linda
Arnold, Nathan
Whelan, Kelli
Paterson, Kurt
Young, Dale
author_sort Kilungo, Aminata
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to examine three well designs: drilled wells (20–30 m deep), closed dug wells (>5 m deep), and hand-dug open wells (<5 m deep), to determine the water quality for improving access to safe and clean water in rural communities. Heterotrophic plate count (HPC), total coliforms (TC), Escherichia coli (E. coli) and turbidity, were used to assess the water quality of 97 wells. Additionally, the study looked at the microflora diversity of the water, focusing on potential pathogens using outgrowth, PCR, and genome sequencing for 10 wells. Concentrations of TC for the open dug wells (4 × 10(4) CFU/100 mL) were higher than the drilled (2 × 10(3) CFU/100 mL) and closed dug wells (3 × 10(3) CFU/100 mL). E. coli concentration for drilled and closed dug wells was <22 MPN (most probable number)/100 mL, but higher for open wells (>154 MPN/100 mL). The drilled well turbidity (11 NTU) was within the standard deviation of the closed well (28 NTU) compared to open dug wells (49 NTU). Drilled and closed wells had similar microbial diversity. There were no significant differences between drilled and closed dug wells. The covering and lining of hand-dug wells should be considered as an alternative to improve access to safe and clean water in rural communities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5800163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58001632018-02-06 Evaluation of Well Designs to Improve Access to Safe and Clean Water in Rural Tanzania Kilungo, Aminata Powers, Linda Arnold, Nathan Whelan, Kelli Paterson, Kurt Young, Dale Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The objective of this study was to examine three well designs: drilled wells (20–30 m deep), closed dug wells (>5 m deep), and hand-dug open wells (<5 m deep), to determine the water quality for improving access to safe and clean water in rural communities. Heterotrophic plate count (HPC), total coliforms (TC), Escherichia coli (E. coli) and turbidity, were used to assess the water quality of 97 wells. Additionally, the study looked at the microflora diversity of the water, focusing on potential pathogens using outgrowth, PCR, and genome sequencing for 10 wells. Concentrations of TC for the open dug wells (4 × 10(4) CFU/100 mL) were higher than the drilled (2 × 10(3) CFU/100 mL) and closed dug wells (3 × 10(3) CFU/100 mL). E. coli concentration for drilled and closed dug wells was <22 MPN (most probable number)/100 mL, but higher for open wells (>154 MPN/100 mL). The drilled well turbidity (11 NTU) was within the standard deviation of the closed well (28 NTU) compared to open dug wells (49 NTU). Drilled and closed wells had similar microbial diversity. There were no significant differences between drilled and closed dug wells. The covering and lining of hand-dug wells should be considered as an alternative to improve access to safe and clean water in rural communities. MDPI 2018-01-04 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5800163/ /pubmed/29300305 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010064 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kilungo, Aminata
Powers, Linda
Arnold, Nathan
Whelan, Kelli
Paterson, Kurt
Young, Dale
Evaluation of Well Designs to Improve Access to Safe and Clean Water in Rural Tanzania
title Evaluation of Well Designs to Improve Access to Safe and Clean Water in Rural Tanzania
title_full Evaluation of Well Designs to Improve Access to Safe and Clean Water in Rural Tanzania
title_fullStr Evaluation of Well Designs to Improve Access to Safe and Clean Water in Rural Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Well Designs to Improve Access to Safe and Clean Water in Rural Tanzania
title_short Evaluation of Well Designs to Improve Access to Safe and Clean Water in Rural Tanzania
title_sort evaluation of well designs to improve access to safe and clean water in rural tanzania
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29300305
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010064
work_keys_str_mv AT kilungoaminata evaluationofwelldesignstoimproveaccesstosafeandcleanwaterinruraltanzania
AT powerslinda evaluationofwelldesignstoimproveaccesstosafeandcleanwaterinruraltanzania
AT arnoldnathan evaluationofwelldesignstoimproveaccesstosafeandcleanwaterinruraltanzania
AT whelankelli evaluationofwelldesignstoimproveaccesstosafeandcleanwaterinruraltanzania
AT patersonkurt evaluationofwelldesignstoimproveaccesstosafeandcleanwaterinruraltanzania
AT youngdale evaluationofwelldesignstoimproveaccesstosafeandcleanwaterinruraltanzania