Cargando…
Evaluation of Well Designs to Improve Access to Safe and Clean Water in Rural Tanzania
The objective of this study was to examine three well designs: drilled wells (20–30 m deep), closed dug wells (>5 m deep), and hand-dug open wells (<5 m deep), to determine the water quality for improving access to safe and clean water in rural communities. Heterotrophic plate count (HPC), tot...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29300305 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010064 |
_version_ | 1783298156053659648 |
---|---|
author | Kilungo, Aminata Powers, Linda Arnold, Nathan Whelan, Kelli Paterson, Kurt Young, Dale |
author_facet | Kilungo, Aminata Powers, Linda Arnold, Nathan Whelan, Kelli Paterson, Kurt Young, Dale |
author_sort | Kilungo, Aminata |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of this study was to examine three well designs: drilled wells (20–30 m deep), closed dug wells (>5 m deep), and hand-dug open wells (<5 m deep), to determine the water quality for improving access to safe and clean water in rural communities. Heterotrophic plate count (HPC), total coliforms (TC), Escherichia coli (E. coli) and turbidity, were used to assess the water quality of 97 wells. Additionally, the study looked at the microflora diversity of the water, focusing on potential pathogens using outgrowth, PCR, and genome sequencing for 10 wells. Concentrations of TC for the open dug wells (4 × 10(4) CFU/100 mL) were higher than the drilled (2 × 10(3) CFU/100 mL) and closed dug wells (3 × 10(3) CFU/100 mL). E. coli concentration for drilled and closed dug wells was <22 MPN (most probable number)/100 mL, but higher for open wells (>154 MPN/100 mL). The drilled well turbidity (11 NTU) was within the standard deviation of the closed well (28 NTU) compared to open dug wells (49 NTU). Drilled and closed wells had similar microbial diversity. There were no significant differences between drilled and closed dug wells. The covering and lining of hand-dug wells should be considered as an alternative to improve access to safe and clean water in rural communities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5800163 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58001632018-02-06 Evaluation of Well Designs to Improve Access to Safe and Clean Water in Rural Tanzania Kilungo, Aminata Powers, Linda Arnold, Nathan Whelan, Kelli Paterson, Kurt Young, Dale Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The objective of this study was to examine three well designs: drilled wells (20–30 m deep), closed dug wells (>5 m deep), and hand-dug open wells (<5 m deep), to determine the water quality for improving access to safe and clean water in rural communities. Heterotrophic plate count (HPC), total coliforms (TC), Escherichia coli (E. coli) and turbidity, were used to assess the water quality of 97 wells. Additionally, the study looked at the microflora diversity of the water, focusing on potential pathogens using outgrowth, PCR, and genome sequencing for 10 wells. Concentrations of TC for the open dug wells (4 × 10(4) CFU/100 mL) were higher than the drilled (2 × 10(3) CFU/100 mL) and closed dug wells (3 × 10(3) CFU/100 mL). E. coli concentration for drilled and closed dug wells was <22 MPN (most probable number)/100 mL, but higher for open wells (>154 MPN/100 mL). The drilled well turbidity (11 NTU) was within the standard deviation of the closed well (28 NTU) compared to open dug wells (49 NTU). Drilled and closed wells had similar microbial diversity. There were no significant differences between drilled and closed dug wells. The covering and lining of hand-dug wells should be considered as an alternative to improve access to safe and clean water in rural communities. MDPI 2018-01-04 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5800163/ /pubmed/29300305 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010064 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kilungo, Aminata Powers, Linda Arnold, Nathan Whelan, Kelli Paterson, Kurt Young, Dale Evaluation of Well Designs to Improve Access to Safe and Clean Water in Rural Tanzania |
title | Evaluation of Well Designs to Improve Access to Safe and Clean Water in Rural Tanzania |
title_full | Evaluation of Well Designs to Improve Access to Safe and Clean Water in Rural Tanzania |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Well Designs to Improve Access to Safe and Clean Water in Rural Tanzania |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Well Designs to Improve Access to Safe and Clean Water in Rural Tanzania |
title_short | Evaluation of Well Designs to Improve Access to Safe and Clean Water in Rural Tanzania |
title_sort | evaluation of well designs to improve access to safe and clean water in rural tanzania |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800163/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29300305 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kilungoaminata evaluationofwelldesignstoimproveaccesstosafeandcleanwaterinruraltanzania AT powerslinda evaluationofwelldesignstoimproveaccesstosafeandcleanwaterinruraltanzania AT arnoldnathan evaluationofwelldesignstoimproveaccesstosafeandcleanwaterinruraltanzania AT whelankelli evaluationofwelldesignstoimproveaccesstosafeandcleanwaterinruraltanzania AT patersonkurt evaluationofwelldesignstoimproveaccesstosafeandcleanwaterinruraltanzania AT youngdale evaluationofwelldesignstoimproveaccesstosafeandcleanwaterinruraltanzania |