Cargando…

Impact of Smoking Ban on Passive Smoke Exposure in Pregnant Non-Smokers in the Southeastern United States

Prenatal passive smoke exposure raises risk for negative birth outcomes. Legislation regulating public smoking has been shown to impact exposure levels, though fewer studies involving pregnant women have been conducted within the U.S. where bans are inconsistent across regions. This study examined t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schechter, Julia C., Fuemmeler, Bernard F., Hoyo, Cathrine, Murphy, Susan K., Zhang, Junfeng (Jim), Kollins, Scott H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316617
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010083
_version_ 1783298160454533120
author Schechter, Julia C.
Fuemmeler, Bernard F.
Hoyo, Cathrine
Murphy, Susan K.
Zhang, Junfeng (Jim)
Kollins, Scott H.
author_facet Schechter, Julia C.
Fuemmeler, Bernard F.
Hoyo, Cathrine
Murphy, Susan K.
Zhang, Junfeng (Jim)
Kollins, Scott H.
author_sort Schechter, Julia C.
collection PubMed
description Prenatal passive smoke exposure raises risk for negative birth outcomes. Legislation regulating public smoking has been shown to impact exposure levels, though fewer studies involving pregnant women have been conducted within the U.S. where bans are inconsistent across regions. This study examined the effect of a ban enacted in the southeastern U.S. on pregnant women’s cotinine levels. Additional analyses compared self-reported exposure to cotinine and identified characteristics associated with passive exposure. Pregnant women (N = 851) were recruited prospectively between 2005 and 2011 in North Carolina. Sociodemographic and health data were collected via surveys; maternal blood samples were assayed for cotinine. Among non-active smokers who provided self-report data regarding passive exposure (N = 503), 20% were inconsistent with corresponding cotinine. Among all non-smokers (N = 668), being unmarried, African American, and less educated were each associated with greater passive exposure. Controlling for covariates, mean cotinine was higher prior to the ban compared to after, F(1, 640) = 24.65, p < 0.001. Results suggest that banning smoking in public spaces may reduce passive smoke exposure for non-smoking pregnant women. These data are some of the first to examine the impact of legislation on passive smoke exposure in pregnant women within the U.S. using a biomarker and can inform policy in regions lacking comprehensive smoke-free legislation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5800182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58001822018-02-06 Impact of Smoking Ban on Passive Smoke Exposure in Pregnant Non-Smokers in the Southeastern United States Schechter, Julia C. Fuemmeler, Bernard F. Hoyo, Cathrine Murphy, Susan K. Zhang, Junfeng (Jim) Kollins, Scott H. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Prenatal passive smoke exposure raises risk for negative birth outcomes. Legislation regulating public smoking has been shown to impact exposure levels, though fewer studies involving pregnant women have been conducted within the U.S. where bans are inconsistent across regions. This study examined the effect of a ban enacted in the southeastern U.S. on pregnant women’s cotinine levels. Additional analyses compared self-reported exposure to cotinine and identified characteristics associated with passive exposure. Pregnant women (N = 851) were recruited prospectively between 2005 and 2011 in North Carolina. Sociodemographic and health data were collected via surveys; maternal blood samples were assayed for cotinine. Among non-active smokers who provided self-report data regarding passive exposure (N = 503), 20% were inconsistent with corresponding cotinine. Among all non-smokers (N = 668), being unmarried, African American, and less educated were each associated with greater passive exposure. Controlling for covariates, mean cotinine was higher prior to the ban compared to after, F(1, 640) = 24.65, p < 0.001. Results suggest that banning smoking in public spaces may reduce passive smoke exposure for non-smoking pregnant women. These data are some of the first to examine the impact of legislation on passive smoke exposure in pregnant women within the U.S. using a biomarker and can inform policy in regions lacking comprehensive smoke-free legislation. MDPI 2018-01-06 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5800182/ /pubmed/29316617 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010083 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schechter, Julia C.
Fuemmeler, Bernard F.
Hoyo, Cathrine
Murphy, Susan K.
Zhang, Junfeng (Jim)
Kollins, Scott H.
Impact of Smoking Ban on Passive Smoke Exposure in Pregnant Non-Smokers in the Southeastern United States
title Impact of Smoking Ban on Passive Smoke Exposure in Pregnant Non-Smokers in the Southeastern United States
title_full Impact of Smoking Ban on Passive Smoke Exposure in Pregnant Non-Smokers in the Southeastern United States
title_fullStr Impact of Smoking Ban on Passive Smoke Exposure in Pregnant Non-Smokers in the Southeastern United States
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Smoking Ban on Passive Smoke Exposure in Pregnant Non-Smokers in the Southeastern United States
title_short Impact of Smoking Ban on Passive Smoke Exposure in Pregnant Non-Smokers in the Southeastern United States
title_sort impact of smoking ban on passive smoke exposure in pregnant non-smokers in the southeastern united states
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316617
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010083
work_keys_str_mv AT schechterjuliac impactofsmokingbanonpassivesmokeexposureinpregnantnonsmokersinthesoutheasternunitedstates
AT fuemmelerbernardf impactofsmokingbanonpassivesmokeexposureinpregnantnonsmokersinthesoutheasternunitedstates
AT hoyocathrine impactofsmokingbanonpassivesmokeexposureinpregnantnonsmokersinthesoutheasternunitedstates
AT murphysusank impactofsmokingbanonpassivesmokeexposureinpregnantnonsmokersinthesoutheasternunitedstates
AT zhangjunfengjim impactofsmokingbanonpassivesmokeexposureinpregnantnonsmokersinthesoutheasternunitedstates
AT kollinsscotth impactofsmokingbanonpassivesmokeexposureinpregnantnonsmokersinthesoutheasternunitedstates