Cargando…

Comparing U.S. Injury Death Estimates from GBD 2015 and CDC WONDER

Objective: The purpose of the present study was to examine consistency in injury death statistics from the United States CDC Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) with those from GBD 2015 estimates. Methods: Differences in deaths and the percent difference in deaths betwee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Yue, Cheng, Xunjie, Ning, Peishan, Cheng, Peixia, Schwebel, David C., Hu, Guoqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010087
_version_ 1783298161401397248
author Wu, Yue
Cheng, Xunjie
Ning, Peishan
Cheng, Peixia
Schwebel, David C.
Hu, Guoqing
author_facet Wu, Yue
Cheng, Xunjie
Ning, Peishan
Cheng, Peixia
Schwebel, David C.
Hu, Guoqing
author_sort Wu, Yue
collection PubMed
description Objective: The purpose of the present study was to examine consistency in injury death statistics from the United States CDC Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) with those from GBD 2015 estimates. Methods: Differences in deaths and the percent difference in deaths between GBD 2015 and CDC WONDER were assessed, as were changes in deaths between 2000 and 2015 for the two datasets. Results: From 2000 to 2015, GBD 2015 estimates for the U.S. injury deaths were somewhat higher than CDC WONDER estimates in most categories, with the exception of deaths from falls and from forces of nature, war, and legal intervention in 2015. Encouragingly, the difference in total injury deaths between the two data sources narrowed from 44,897 (percent difference in deaths = 41%) in 2000 to 34,877 (percent difference in deaths = 25%) in 2015. Differences in deaths and percent difference in deaths between the two data sources varied greatly across injury cause and over the assessment years. The two data sources present consistent changes in direction from 2000 to 2015 for all injury causes except for forces of nature, war, and legal intervention, and adverse effects of medical treatment. Conclusions: We conclude that further studies are warranted to interpret the inconsistencies in data and develop estimation approaches that increase the consistency of the two datasets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5800186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58001862018-02-06 Comparing U.S. Injury Death Estimates from GBD 2015 and CDC WONDER Wu, Yue Cheng, Xunjie Ning, Peishan Cheng, Peixia Schwebel, David C. Hu, Guoqing Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Objective: The purpose of the present study was to examine consistency in injury death statistics from the United States CDC Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) with those from GBD 2015 estimates. Methods: Differences in deaths and the percent difference in deaths between GBD 2015 and CDC WONDER were assessed, as were changes in deaths between 2000 and 2015 for the two datasets. Results: From 2000 to 2015, GBD 2015 estimates for the U.S. injury deaths were somewhat higher than CDC WONDER estimates in most categories, with the exception of deaths from falls and from forces of nature, war, and legal intervention in 2015. Encouragingly, the difference in total injury deaths between the two data sources narrowed from 44,897 (percent difference in deaths = 41%) in 2000 to 34,877 (percent difference in deaths = 25%) in 2015. Differences in deaths and percent difference in deaths between the two data sources varied greatly across injury cause and over the assessment years. The two data sources present consistent changes in direction from 2000 to 2015 for all injury causes except for forces of nature, war, and legal intervention, and adverse effects of medical treatment. Conclusions: We conclude that further studies are warranted to interpret the inconsistencies in data and develop estimation approaches that increase the consistency of the two datasets. MDPI 2018-01-07 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5800186/ /pubmed/29316676 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010087 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wu, Yue
Cheng, Xunjie
Ning, Peishan
Cheng, Peixia
Schwebel, David C.
Hu, Guoqing
Comparing U.S. Injury Death Estimates from GBD 2015 and CDC WONDER
title Comparing U.S. Injury Death Estimates from GBD 2015 and CDC WONDER
title_full Comparing U.S. Injury Death Estimates from GBD 2015 and CDC WONDER
title_fullStr Comparing U.S. Injury Death Estimates from GBD 2015 and CDC WONDER
title_full_unstemmed Comparing U.S. Injury Death Estimates from GBD 2015 and CDC WONDER
title_short Comparing U.S. Injury Death Estimates from GBD 2015 and CDC WONDER
title_sort comparing u.s. injury death estimates from gbd 2015 and cdc wonder
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29316676
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15010087
work_keys_str_mv AT wuyue comparingusinjurydeathestimatesfromgbd2015andcdcwonder
AT chengxunjie comparingusinjurydeathestimatesfromgbd2015andcdcwonder
AT ningpeishan comparingusinjurydeathestimatesfromgbd2015andcdcwonder
AT chengpeixia comparingusinjurydeathestimatesfromgbd2015andcdcwonder
AT schwebeldavidc comparingusinjurydeathestimatesfromgbd2015andcdcwonder
AT huguoqing comparingusinjurydeathestimatesfromgbd2015andcdcwonder