Cargando…

Performance of a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in an independent cohort of 523 cutaneous melanoma patients

BACKGROUND: The heterogeneous behavior of patients with melanoma makes prognostication challenging. To address this, a gene expression profile (GEP) test to predict metastatic risk was previously developed. This study evaluates the GEP’s prognostic accuracy in an independent cohort of cutaneous mela...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zager, Jonathan S., Gastman, Brian R., Leachman, Sancy, Gonzalez, Rene C., Fleming, Martin D., Ferris, Laura K., Ho, Jonhan, Miller, Alexander R., Cook, Robert W., Covington, Kyle R., Meldi-Plasseraud, Kristen, Middlebrook, Brooke, Kaminester, Lewis H., Greisinger, Anthony, Estrada, Sarah I., Pariser, David M., Cranmer, Lee D., Messina, Jane L., Vetto, John T., Wayne, Jeffrey D., Delman, Keith A., Lawson, David H., Gerami, Pedram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29402264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4016-3
_version_ 1783298183898595328
author Zager, Jonathan S.
Gastman, Brian R.
Leachman, Sancy
Gonzalez, Rene C.
Fleming, Martin D.
Ferris, Laura K.
Ho, Jonhan
Miller, Alexander R.
Cook, Robert W.
Covington, Kyle R.
Meldi-Plasseraud, Kristen
Middlebrook, Brooke
Kaminester, Lewis H.
Greisinger, Anthony
Estrada, Sarah I.
Pariser, David M.
Cranmer, Lee D.
Messina, Jane L.
Vetto, John T.
Wayne, Jeffrey D.
Delman, Keith A.
Lawson, David H.
Gerami, Pedram
author_facet Zager, Jonathan S.
Gastman, Brian R.
Leachman, Sancy
Gonzalez, Rene C.
Fleming, Martin D.
Ferris, Laura K.
Ho, Jonhan
Miller, Alexander R.
Cook, Robert W.
Covington, Kyle R.
Meldi-Plasseraud, Kristen
Middlebrook, Brooke
Kaminester, Lewis H.
Greisinger, Anthony
Estrada, Sarah I.
Pariser, David M.
Cranmer, Lee D.
Messina, Jane L.
Vetto, John T.
Wayne, Jeffrey D.
Delman, Keith A.
Lawson, David H.
Gerami, Pedram
author_sort Zager, Jonathan S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The heterogeneous behavior of patients with melanoma makes prognostication challenging. To address this, a gene expression profile (GEP) test to predict metastatic risk was previously developed. This study evaluates the GEP’s prognostic accuracy in an independent cohort of cutaneous melanoma patients. METHODS: This multi-center study analyzed primary melanoma tumors from 523 patients, using the GEP to classify patients as Class 1 (low risk) and Class 2 (high risk). Molecular classification was correlated to clinical outcome and assessed along with AJCC v7 staging criteria. Primary endpoints were recurrence-free (RFS) and distant metastasis-free (DMFS) survival. RESULTS: The 5-year RFS rates for Class 1 and Class 2 were 88% and 52%, respectively, and DMFS rates were 93% versus 60%, respectively (P < 0.001). The GEP was a significant predictor of RFS and DMFS in univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.4 and 6.6, respectively, P < 0.001 for each), along with Breslow thickness, ulceration, mitotic rate, and sentinel lymph node (SLN) status (P < 0.001 for each). GEP, tumor thickness and SLN status were significant predictors of RFS and DMFS in a multivariate model that also included ulceration and mitotic rate (RFS HR = 2.1, 1.2, and 2.5, respectively, P < 0.001 for each; and DMFS HR = 2.7, 1.3 and 3.0, respectively, P < 0.01 for each). CONCLUSIONS: The GEP test is an objective predictor of metastatic risk and provides additional independent prognostic information to traditional staging to help estimate an individual’s risk for recurrence. The assay identified 70% of stage I and II patients who ultimately developed distant metastasis. Its role in consideration of patients for adjuvant therapy should be examined prospectively. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4016-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5800282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58002822018-02-13 Performance of a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in an independent cohort of 523 cutaneous melanoma patients Zager, Jonathan S. Gastman, Brian R. Leachman, Sancy Gonzalez, Rene C. Fleming, Martin D. Ferris, Laura K. Ho, Jonhan Miller, Alexander R. Cook, Robert W. Covington, Kyle R. Meldi-Plasseraud, Kristen Middlebrook, Brooke Kaminester, Lewis H. Greisinger, Anthony Estrada, Sarah I. Pariser, David M. Cranmer, Lee D. Messina, Jane L. Vetto, John T. Wayne, Jeffrey D. Delman, Keith A. Lawson, David H. Gerami, Pedram BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: The heterogeneous behavior of patients with melanoma makes prognostication challenging. To address this, a gene expression profile (GEP) test to predict metastatic risk was previously developed. This study evaluates the GEP’s prognostic accuracy in an independent cohort of cutaneous melanoma patients. METHODS: This multi-center study analyzed primary melanoma tumors from 523 patients, using the GEP to classify patients as Class 1 (low risk) and Class 2 (high risk). Molecular classification was correlated to clinical outcome and assessed along with AJCC v7 staging criteria. Primary endpoints were recurrence-free (RFS) and distant metastasis-free (DMFS) survival. RESULTS: The 5-year RFS rates for Class 1 and Class 2 were 88% and 52%, respectively, and DMFS rates were 93% versus 60%, respectively (P < 0.001). The GEP was a significant predictor of RFS and DMFS in univariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.4 and 6.6, respectively, P < 0.001 for each), along with Breslow thickness, ulceration, mitotic rate, and sentinel lymph node (SLN) status (P < 0.001 for each). GEP, tumor thickness and SLN status were significant predictors of RFS and DMFS in a multivariate model that also included ulceration and mitotic rate (RFS HR = 2.1, 1.2, and 2.5, respectively, P < 0.001 for each; and DMFS HR = 2.7, 1.3 and 3.0, respectively, P < 0.01 for each). CONCLUSIONS: The GEP test is an objective predictor of metastatic risk and provides additional independent prognostic information to traditional staging to help estimate an individual’s risk for recurrence. The assay identified 70% of stage I and II patients who ultimately developed distant metastasis. Its role in consideration of patients for adjuvant therapy should be examined prospectively. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4016-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5800282/ /pubmed/29402264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4016-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zager, Jonathan S.
Gastman, Brian R.
Leachman, Sancy
Gonzalez, Rene C.
Fleming, Martin D.
Ferris, Laura K.
Ho, Jonhan
Miller, Alexander R.
Cook, Robert W.
Covington, Kyle R.
Meldi-Plasseraud, Kristen
Middlebrook, Brooke
Kaminester, Lewis H.
Greisinger, Anthony
Estrada, Sarah I.
Pariser, David M.
Cranmer, Lee D.
Messina, Jane L.
Vetto, John T.
Wayne, Jeffrey D.
Delman, Keith A.
Lawson, David H.
Gerami, Pedram
Performance of a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in an independent cohort of 523 cutaneous melanoma patients
title Performance of a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in an independent cohort of 523 cutaneous melanoma patients
title_full Performance of a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in an independent cohort of 523 cutaneous melanoma patients
title_fullStr Performance of a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in an independent cohort of 523 cutaneous melanoma patients
title_full_unstemmed Performance of a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in an independent cohort of 523 cutaneous melanoma patients
title_short Performance of a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in an independent cohort of 523 cutaneous melanoma patients
title_sort performance of a prognostic 31-gene expression profile in an independent cohort of 523 cutaneous melanoma patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29402264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4016-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zagerjonathans performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT gastmanbrianr performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT leachmansancy performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT gonzalezrenec performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT flemingmartind performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT ferrislaurak performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT hojonhan performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT milleralexanderr performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT cookrobertw performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT covingtonkyler performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT meldiplasseraudkristen performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT middlebrookbrooke performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT kaminesterlewish performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT greisingeranthony performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT estradasarahi performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT pariserdavidm performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT cranmerleed performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT messinajanel performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT vettojohnt performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT waynejeffreyd performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT delmankeitha performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT lawsondavidh performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients
AT geramipedram performanceofaprognostic31geneexpressionprofileinanindependentcohortof523cutaneousmelanomapatients