Cargando…

Contaminated fingers: a potential cause of Chlamydia trachomatis-positive urine specimens

OBJECTIVES: The detection of an STI agent in a urogenital tract (UGT) specimen from a young child is regarded as being indicative of sexual abuse. However, the probabilities of contamination events that could conceivably lead to STI positive specimens in the absence of sexual contact are unclear. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giffard, Philip M, Lilliebridge, Rachael A, Wilson, Judith, Murray, Gerald, Phillips, Samuel, Tabrizi, Sepehr N, Garland, Suzanne M, Martin, Louise, Singh, Gurmeet, Tong, Steven Y C, Holt, Deborah C, Andersson, Patiyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sexually Transmitted Infections 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28600332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2016-053081
_version_ 1783298191808004096
author Giffard, Philip M
Lilliebridge, Rachael A
Wilson, Judith
Murray, Gerald
Phillips, Samuel
Tabrizi, Sepehr N
Garland, Suzanne M
Martin, Louise
Singh, Gurmeet
Tong, Steven Y C
Holt, Deborah C
Andersson, Patiyan
author_facet Giffard, Philip M
Lilliebridge, Rachael A
Wilson, Judith
Murray, Gerald
Phillips, Samuel
Tabrizi, Sepehr N
Garland, Suzanne M
Martin, Louise
Singh, Gurmeet
Tong, Steven Y C
Holt, Deborah C
Andersson, Patiyan
author_sort Giffard, Philip M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The detection of an STI agent in a urogenital tract (UGT) specimen from a young child is regarded as being indicative of sexual abuse. However, the probabilities of contamination events that could conceivably lead to STI positive specimens in the absence of sexual contact are unclear. The objective was to estimate the potential for fingers that have come in contact with Chlamydia trachomatis-positive urine to detectably contaminate C. trachomatis-negative urine. METHODS: The study design was based on self-experimentation. Dilutions of C. trachomatis elementary bodies (EBs) were prepared. A participant contacted an EB dilution then a urine surrogate specimen. The experiment was performed by three participants using three C. trachomatis isolates, of genotype E, F and B. Two surrogate urine contact methods were used to mimic contamination of a carer assisting with a child’s urine collection. All EB dilutions and urine surrogate specimens were subjected to C. trachomatis assay and quantification in a real-time PCR-based diagnostic system. RESULTS: The amplimer crossing point (Cq) for EB dilutions was 10.0±1.6 less than for corresponding finger contacted urine specimens, which corresponds to ~10 µL of EB suspension transferred. This was largely independent of participant identity, C. trachomatis strain or EB dilution. Hand decontamination led to large reductions in EBs transferred, but transfer remained consistently detectable. Recent Cq data from C. trachomatis-positive clinical urine specimens were collated, and 20% clearly contained sufficient C. trachomatis to detectably contaminate another specimen by finger-mediated transfer, as in this experiment. CONCLUSIONS: This study directly demonstrated the potential for urine contaminated fingers to convert a C. trachomatis-negative urine specimen to C. trachomatis positive as a result of contact. Accordingly, procedures for urine specimen collection, particularly from children, need to be designed to prevent contamination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5800334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sexually Transmitted Infections
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58003342018-02-09 Contaminated fingers: a potential cause of Chlamydia trachomatis-positive urine specimens Giffard, Philip M Lilliebridge, Rachael A Wilson, Judith Murray, Gerald Phillips, Samuel Tabrizi, Sepehr N Garland, Suzanne M Martin, Louise Singh, Gurmeet Tong, Steven Y C Holt, Deborah C Andersson, Patiyan Sex Transm Infect Basic Science OBJECTIVES: The detection of an STI agent in a urogenital tract (UGT) specimen from a young child is regarded as being indicative of sexual abuse. However, the probabilities of contamination events that could conceivably lead to STI positive specimens in the absence of sexual contact are unclear. The objective was to estimate the potential for fingers that have come in contact with Chlamydia trachomatis-positive urine to detectably contaminate C. trachomatis-negative urine. METHODS: The study design was based on self-experimentation. Dilutions of C. trachomatis elementary bodies (EBs) were prepared. A participant contacted an EB dilution then a urine surrogate specimen. The experiment was performed by three participants using three C. trachomatis isolates, of genotype E, F and B. Two surrogate urine contact methods were used to mimic contamination of a carer assisting with a child’s urine collection. All EB dilutions and urine surrogate specimens were subjected to C. trachomatis assay and quantification in a real-time PCR-based diagnostic system. RESULTS: The amplimer crossing point (Cq) for EB dilutions was 10.0±1.6 less than for corresponding finger contacted urine specimens, which corresponds to ~10 µL of EB suspension transferred. This was largely independent of participant identity, C. trachomatis strain or EB dilution. Hand decontamination led to large reductions in EBs transferred, but transfer remained consistently detectable. Recent Cq data from C. trachomatis-positive clinical urine specimens were collated, and 20% clearly contained sufficient C. trachomatis to detectably contaminate another specimen by finger-mediated transfer, as in this experiment. CONCLUSIONS: This study directly demonstrated the potential for urine contaminated fingers to convert a C. trachomatis-negative urine specimen to C. trachomatis positive as a result of contact. Accordingly, procedures for urine specimen collection, particularly from children, need to be designed to prevent contamination. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2018-02 2017-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5800334/ /pubmed/28600332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2016-053081 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Basic Science
Giffard, Philip M
Lilliebridge, Rachael A
Wilson, Judith
Murray, Gerald
Phillips, Samuel
Tabrizi, Sepehr N
Garland, Suzanne M
Martin, Louise
Singh, Gurmeet
Tong, Steven Y C
Holt, Deborah C
Andersson, Patiyan
Contaminated fingers: a potential cause of Chlamydia trachomatis-positive urine specimens
title Contaminated fingers: a potential cause of Chlamydia trachomatis-positive urine specimens
title_full Contaminated fingers: a potential cause of Chlamydia trachomatis-positive urine specimens
title_fullStr Contaminated fingers: a potential cause of Chlamydia trachomatis-positive urine specimens
title_full_unstemmed Contaminated fingers: a potential cause of Chlamydia trachomatis-positive urine specimens
title_short Contaminated fingers: a potential cause of Chlamydia trachomatis-positive urine specimens
title_sort contaminated fingers: a potential cause of chlamydia trachomatis-positive urine specimens
topic Basic Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28600332
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2016-053081
work_keys_str_mv AT giffardphilipm contaminatedfingersapotentialcauseofchlamydiatrachomatispositiveurinespecimens
AT lilliebridgerachaela contaminatedfingersapotentialcauseofchlamydiatrachomatispositiveurinespecimens
AT wilsonjudith contaminatedfingersapotentialcauseofchlamydiatrachomatispositiveurinespecimens
AT murraygerald contaminatedfingersapotentialcauseofchlamydiatrachomatispositiveurinespecimens
AT phillipssamuel contaminatedfingersapotentialcauseofchlamydiatrachomatispositiveurinespecimens
AT tabrizisepehrn contaminatedfingersapotentialcauseofchlamydiatrachomatispositiveurinespecimens
AT garlandsuzannem contaminatedfingersapotentialcauseofchlamydiatrachomatispositiveurinespecimens
AT martinlouise contaminatedfingersapotentialcauseofchlamydiatrachomatispositiveurinespecimens
AT singhgurmeet contaminatedfingersapotentialcauseofchlamydiatrachomatispositiveurinespecimens
AT tongstevenyc contaminatedfingersapotentialcauseofchlamydiatrachomatispositiveurinespecimens
AT holtdeborahc contaminatedfingersapotentialcauseofchlamydiatrachomatispositiveurinespecimens
AT anderssonpatiyan contaminatedfingersapotentialcauseofchlamydiatrachomatispositiveurinespecimens