Cargando…

Analysis of neointima development in flow diverters using optical coherence tomography imaging

BACKGROUND: Flow diverters are used for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Surface modification may decrease the thrombogenicity of flow diverters but the details are unknown. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an intravascular imaging test with high resolution which identifies neointimal g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsuda, Yoshikazu, Chung, Joonho, Lopes, Demetrius K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28592484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012969
_version_ 1783298192509501440
author Matsuda, Yoshikazu
Chung, Joonho
Lopes, Demetrius K
author_facet Matsuda, Yoshikazu
Chung, Joonho
Lopes, Demetrius K
author_sort Matsuda, Yoshikazu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Flow diverters are used for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Surface modification may decrease the thrombogenicity of flow diverters but the details are unknown. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an intravascular imaging test with high resolution which identifies neointimal growth over stents. We compared the development of neointima in a flow diverter and stents with and without surface modification in a swine model. METHODS: In this study we implanted four devices (two in each carotid artery) in four pigs. The devices used were the Pipeline Flex embolization device (PED Flex, n=6), PED with Shield technology (PED Shield, n=6), and Solitaire AB (n=4). Serial carotid angiographic and OCT images were obtained on days 0, 7, 14, and 21. The data analyzed included: neointimal area (lumen area − stent area), neointimal ratio ([lumen area − stent area]/stent area), and the neointimal thickness ratio (minimum neointimal thickness/maximum neointimal thickness). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in where neointima formation was initiated in relation to the implanted device (distal vs middle vs proximal). The PED Shield had a trend towards earlier endothelial formation at day 7. By day 21 the neointimal ratio was significantly higher for the PED Flex and PED Shield devices than for Solitaire (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). The neointimal thickness ratio was significantly higher with PED Shield than with PED Flex and Solitaire (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: OCT enabled us to follow and compare in vivo the development of neointima over implants. PED Shield showed a similar neointimal volume to PED Flex and more concentric neointima.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5800337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58003372018-02-09 Analysis of neointima development in flow diverters using optical coherence tomography imaging Matsuda, Yoshikazu Chung, Joonho Lopes, Demetrius K J Neurointerv Surg Neuroimaging BACKGROUND: Flow diverters are used for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Surface modification may decrease the thrombogenicity of flow diverters but the details are unknown. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an intravascular imaging test with high resolution which identifies neointimal growth over stents. We compared the development of neointima in a flow diverter and stents with and without surface modification in a swine model. METHODS: In this study we implanted four devices (two in each carotid artery) in four pigs. The devices used were the Pipeline Flex embolization device (PED Flex, n=6), PED with Shield technology (PED Shield, n=6), and Solitaire AB (n=4). Serial carotid angiographic and OCT images were obtained on days 0, 7, 14, and 21. The data analyzed included: neointimal area (lumen area − stent area), neointimal ratio ([lumen area − stent area]/stent area), and the neointimal thickness ratio (minimum neointimal thickness/maximum neointimal thickness). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in where neointima formation was initiated in relation to the implanted device (distal vs middle vs proximal). The PED Shield had a trend towards earlier endothelial formation at day 7. By day 21 the neointimal ratio was significantly higher for the PED Flex and PED Shield devices than for Solitaire (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). The neointimal thickness ratio was significantly higher with PED Shield than with PED Flex and Solitaire (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: OCT enabled us to follow and compare in vivo the development of neointima over implants. PED Shield showed a similar neointimal volume to PED Flex and more concentric neointima. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-02 2017-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5800337/ /pubmed/28592484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012969 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Neuroimaging
Matsuda, Yoshikazu
Chung, Joonho
Lopes, Demetrius K
Analysis of neointima development in flow diverters using optical coherence tomography imaging
title Analysis of neointima development in flow diverters using optical coherence tomography imaging
title_full Analysis of neointima development in flow diverters using optical coherence tomography imaging
title_fullStr Analysis of neointima development in flow diverters using optical coherence tomography imaging
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of neointima development in flow diverters using optical coherence tomography imaging
title_short Analysis of neointima development in flow diverters using optical coherence tomography imaging
title_sort analysis of neointima development in flow diverters using optical coherence tomography imaging
topic Neuroimaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5800337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28592484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012969
work_keys_str_mv AT matsudayoshikazu analysisofneointimadevelopmentinflowdivertersusingopticalcoherencetomographyimaging
AT chungjoonho analysisofneointimadevelopmentinflowdivertersusingopticalcoherencetomographyimaging
AT lopesdemetriusk analysisofneointimadevelopmentinflowdivertersusingopticalcoherencetomographyimaging