Cargando…

Utility and Limitations of Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis as Compared with Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for Diagnosis of Diabetes

INTRODUCTION: To study the utility of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in the diagnosis of diabetes in patients with cirrhosis as compared to the gold standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to see the effect of anemia and severity of cirrhosis on its performance. METHODS: Individuals (n = 100) w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sehrawat, Tejasav, Jindal, Anuraag, Kohli, Paaras, Thour, Amit, Kaur, Jasbinder, Sachdev, Atul, Gupta, Yashdeep
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5801248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29305791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0362-4
_version_ 1783298315877613568
author Sehrawat, Tejasav
Jindal, Anuraag
Kohli, Paaras
Thour, Amit
Kaur, Jasbinder
Sachdev, Atul
Gupta, Yashdeep
author_facet Sehrawat, Tejasav
Jindal, Anuraag
Kohli, Paaras
Thour, Amit
Kaur, Jasbinder
Sachdev, Atul
Gupta, Yashdeep
author_sort Sehrawat, Tejasav
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To study the utility of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in the diagnosis of diabetes in patients with cirrhosis as compared to the gold standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to see the effect of anemia and severity of cirrhosis on its performance. METHODS: Individuals (n = 100) with an established diagnosis of liver cirrhosis were recruited. The OGTT was performed as described by the World Health Organization (WHO). The severity of cirrhosis was calculated using the Child–Turcotte–Pugh (CTP) score. The severity of anemia was defined according to WHO criteria. The utility of HbA1c was compared against the OGTT results. Test sensitivity and specificity were used to describe the diagnostic accuracy of HbA1c. RESULTS: A total of 100 subjects aged 46.9 ± 9.1 years (mean ± standard deviation) participated in the study, of whom 65% were recruited from out patient department of our hospital. The overall sensitivity and specificity of a HbA1c level of ≥ 6.5% for the diagnosis of diabetes in patients with cirrhosis was 77.1% (95% CI 59.9, 89.6) and 90.8% (95% CI 81.0, 96.5), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 81.8% (95% CI 67.3, 90.8) and 88.1% (95% CI 80.0, 93.2), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.85 (95% CI 0.75–0.94). The sensitivity of HbA1c for diagnosing diabetes in outpatients was 87.0% (95% CI 66.4, 97.2) and was better than that for diagnosing diabetes in hospitalized patients (58.3%; 95% CI 27.7, 84.8). The sensitivity of HbA1c for diagnosing diabetes was poor in patients with moderate to severe anemia. The difference in sensitivity and specificity was not statistically different for CTP classes A, B and C. The prevalence of diabetes as defined by American Diabetes Association OGTT criteria was 35% (95% CI 25.7–45.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Taking OGTT as the gold standard, the sensitivity of HbA1c for diagnosing diabetes is good when used in outpatients with cirrhosis. However, the sensitivity of HbA1c decreases when it is used for hospitalized patients, suggesting that it is not a good test for diagnosis of diabetes in such cases. It also performs poorly if the patient has moderate to severe anemia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5801248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58012482018-02-12 Utility and Limitations of Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis as Compared with Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for Diagnosis of Diabetes Sehrawat, Tejasav Jindal, Anuraag Kohli, Paaras Thour, Amit Kaur, Jasbinder Sachdev, Atul Gupta, Yashdeep Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: To study the utility of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in the diagnosis of diabetes in patients with cirrhosis as compared to the gold standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and to see the effect of anemia and severity of cirrhosis on its performance. METHODS: Individuals (n = 100) with an established diagnosis of liver cirrhosis were recruited. The OGTT was performed as described by the World Health Organization (WHO). The severity of cirrhosis was calculated using the Child–Turcotte–Pugh (CTP) score. The severity of anemia was defined according to WHO criteria. The utility of HbA1c was compared against the OGTT results. Test sensitivity and specificity were used to describe the diagnostic accuracy of HbA1c. RESULTS: A total of 100 subjects aged 46.9 ± 9.1 years (mean ± standard deviation) participated in the study, of whom 65% were recruited from out patient department of our hospital. The overall sensitivity and specificity of a HbA1c level of ≥ 6.5% for the diagnosis of diabetes in patients with cirrhosis was 77.1% (95% CI 59.9, 89.6) and 90.8% (95% CI 81.0, 96.5), respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 81.8% (95% CI 67.3, 90.8) and 88.1% (95% CI 80.0, 93.2), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.85 (95% CI 0.75–0.94). The sensitivity of HbA1c for diagnosing diabetes in outpatients was 87.0% (95% CI 66.4, 97.2) and was better than that for diagnosing diabetes in hospitalized patients (58.3%; 95% CI 27.7, 84.8). The sensitivity of HbA1c for diagnosing diabetes was poor in patients with moderate to severe anemia. The difference in sensitivity and specificity was not statistically different for CTP classes A, B and C. The prevalence of diabetes as defined by American Diabetes Association OGTT criteria was 35% (95% CI 25.7–45.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Taking OGTT as the gold standard, the sensitivity of HbA1c for diagnosing diabetes is good when used in outpatients with cirrhosis. However, the sensitivity of HbA1c decreases when it is used for hospitalized patients, suggesting that it is not a good test for diagnosis of diabetes in such cases. It also performs poorly if the patient has moderate to severe anemia. Springer Healthcare 2018-01-05 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5801248/ /pubmed/29305791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0362-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sehrawat, Tejasav
Jindal, Anuraag
Kohli, Paaras
Thour, Amit
Kaur, Jasbinder
Sachdev, Atul
Gupta, Yashdeep
Utility and Limitations of Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis as Compared with Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for Diagnosis of Diabetes
title Utility and Limitations of Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis as Compared with Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for Diagnosis of Diabetes
title_full Utility and Limitations of Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis as Compared with Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for Diagnosis of Diabetes
title_fullStr Utility and Limitations of Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis as Compared with Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for Diagnosis of Diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Utility and Limitations of Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis as Compared with Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for Diagnosis of Diabetes
title_short Utility and Limitations of Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis as Compared with Oral Glucose Tolerance Test for Diagnosis of Diabetes
title_sort utility and limitations of glycated hemoglobin (hba1c) in patients with liver cirrhosis as compared with oral glucose tolerance test for diagnosis of diabetes
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5801248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29305791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0362-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sehrawattejasav utilityandlimitationsofglycatedhemoglobinhba1cinpatientswithlivercirrhosisascomparedwithoralglucosetolerancetestfordiagnosisofdiabetes
AT jindalanuraag utilityandlimitationsofglycatedhemoglobinhba1cinpatientswithlivercirrhosisascomparedwithoralglucosetolerancetestfordiagnosisofdiabetes
AT kohlipaaras utilityandlimitationsofglycatedhemoglobinhba1cinpatientswithlivercirrhosisascomparedwithoralglucosetolerancetestfordiagnosisofdiabetes
AT thouramit utilityandlimitationsofglycatedhemoglobinhba1cinpatientswithlivercirrhosisascomparedwithoralglucosetolerancetestfordiagnosisofdiabetes
AT kaurjasbinder utilityandlimitationsofglycatedhemoglobinhba1cinpatientswithlivercirrhosisascomparedwithoralglucosetolerancetestfordiagnosisofdiabetes
AT sachdevatul utilityandlimitationsofglycatedhemoglobinhba1cinpatientswithlivercirrhosisascomparedwithoralglucosetolerancetestfordiagnosisofdiabetes
AT guptayashdeep utilityandlimitationsofglycatedhemoglobinhba1cinpatientswithlivercirrhosisascomparedwithoralglucosetolerancetestfordiagnosisofdiabetes