Cargando…

Patient Perceptions and Preferences for a Mealtime Insulin Delivery Patch

INTRODUCTION: A basal-bolus insulin regimen is needed to achieve glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) below 7.0% in people with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 (T2D) diabetes who have significant loss of beta-cell function. Nonadherence to therapy is common and negatively affects the ability to reach treatment go...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peyrot, Mark, Dreon, Darlene, Zraick, Vivien, Cross, Brett, Tan, Meng H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5801251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29327220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0365-1
_version_ 1783298316561285120
author Peyrot, Mark
Dreon, Darlene
Zraick, Vivien
Cross, Brett
Tan, Meng H.
author_facet Peyrot, Mark
Dreon, Darlene
Zraick, Vivien
Cross, Brett
Tan, Meng H.
author_sort Peyrot, Mark
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A basal-bolus insulin regimen is needed to achieve glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) below 7.0% in people with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 (T2D) diabetes who have significant loss of beta-cell function. Nonadherence to therapy is common and negatively affects the ability to reach treatment goals. We examined patient assessment of a new, wearable mealtime insulin-delivery system (patch) relative to their current mealtime insulin-delivery system (syringe, pen, or pump). The patch is designed to deliver only boluses of fast-acting insulin (no basal insulin), mechanically controlled by the patient. METHODS: Adults (n = 101) with T1D or T2D assessed their current mealtime insulin-delivery system and then assessed simulated (no active medication) patch use over a 3-day period. Participants evaluated mealtime insulin-delivery systems using eight measures from five domains (convenience, interference with daily activities, diabetes-related worry, psychological well-being, and overall satisfaction/preference) on the self-administered Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire. User ratings of their current insulin-delivery systems (syringe, pen, pump) were compared with those for the patch by repeated measure analysis of variance and one-sample t tests. RESULTS: Participants had significant (p < 0.05) preference for patch over syringe in all eight comparisons, and over pen in five out of eight comparisons, with no significant preference for pen. Although there was a preference for patch over pump in six out of eight comparisons, only one showed a significant preference for patch, and one for pump. Significantly more participants reported that they would like to switch to the patch than continue using a syringe (78% vs 22%) or pen (76% vs 24%) but this difference was not significant for the group using a pump (52% vs 48%). CONCLUSIONS: Participants preferred using the patch over pens and syringes. Its ease of use and discreet method of insulin delivery may contribute to improved patient adherence to mealtime insulin regimens among people currently using injection devices. FUNDING: Calibra Medical
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5801251
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58012512018-02-12 Patient Perceptions and Preferences for a Mealtime Insulin Delivery Patch Peyrot, Mark Dreon, Darlene Zraick, Vivien Cross, Brett Tan, Meng H. Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: A basal-bolus insulin regimen is needed to achieve glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) below 7.0% in people with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 (T2D) diabetes who have significant loss of beta-cell function. Nonadherence to therapy is common and negatively affects the ability to reach treatment goals. We examined patient assessment of a new, wearable mealtime insulin-delivery system (patch) relative to their current mealtime insulin-delivery system (syringe, pen, or pump). The patch is designed to deliver only boluses of fast-acting insulin (no basal insulin), mechanically controlled by the patient. METHODS: Adults (n = 101) with T1D or T2D assessed their current mealtime insulin-delivery system and then assessed simulated (no active medication) patch use over a 3-day period. Participants evaluated mealtime insulin-delivery systems using eight measures from five domains (convenience, interference with daily activities, diabetes-related worry, psychological well-being, and overall satisfaction/preference) on the self-administered Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire. User ratings of their current insulin-delivery systems (syringe, pen, pump) were compared with those for the patch by repeated measure analysis of variance and one-sample t tests. RESULTS: Participants had significant (p < 0.05) preference for patch over syringe in all eight comparisons, and over pen in five out of eight comparisons, with no significant preference for pen. Although there was a preference for patch over pump in six out of eight comparisons, only one showed a significant preference for patch, and one for pump. Significantly more participants reported that they would like to switch to the patch than continue using a syringe (78% vs 22%) or pen (76% vs 24%) but this difference was not significant for the group using a pump (52% vs 48%). CONCLUSIONS: Participants preferred using the patch over pens and syringes. Its ease of use and discreet method of insulin delivery may contribute to improved patient adherence to mealtime insulin regimens among people currently using injection devices. FUNDING: Calibra Medical Springer Healthcare 2018-01-11 2018-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5801251/ /pubmed/29327220 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0365-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Peyrot, Mark
Dreon, Darlene
Zraick, Vivien
Cross, Brett
Tan, Meng H.
Patient Perceptions and Preferences for a Mealtime Insulin Delivery Patch
title Patient Perceptions and Preferences for a Mealtime Insulin Delivery Patch
title_full Patient Perceptions and Preferences for a Mealtime Insulin Delivery Patch
title_fullStr Patient Perceptions and Preferences for a Mealtime Insulin Delivery Patch
title_full_unstemmed Patient Perceptions and Preferences for a Mealtime Insulin Delivery Patch
title_short Patient Perceptions and Preferences for a Mealtime Insulin Delivery Patch
title_sort patient perceptions and preferences for a mealtime insulin delivery patch
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5801251/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29327220
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-017-0365-1
work_keys_str_mv AT peyrotmark patientperceptionsandpreferencesforamealtimeinsulindeliverypatch
AT dreondarlene patientperceptionsandpreferencesforamealtimeinsulindeliverypatch
AT zraickvivien patientperceptionsandpreferencesforamealtimeinsulindeliverypatch
AT crossbrett patientperceptionsandpreferencesforamealtimeinsulindeliverypatch
AT tanmengh patientperceptionsandpreferencesforamealtimeinsulindeliverypatch