Cargando…
Can We Achieve Intuitive Prosthetic Elbow Control Based on Healthy Upper Limb Motor Strategies?
Most transhumeral amputees report that their prosthetic device lacks functionality, citing the control strategy as a major limitation. Indeed, they are required to control several degrees of freedom with muscle groups primarily used for elbow actuation. As a result, most of them choose to have a one...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5801430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29456499 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2018.00001 |
_version_ | 1783298349040926720 |
---|---|
author | Merad, Manelle de Montalivet, Étienne Touillet, Amélie Martinet, Noël Roby-Brami, Agnès Jarrassé, Nathanaël |
author_facet | Merad, Manelle de Montalivet, Étienne Touillet, Amélie Martinet, Noël Roby-Brami, Agnès Jarrassé, Nathanaël |
author_sort | Merad, Manelle |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most transhumeral amputees report that their prosthetic device lacks functionality, citing the control strategy as a major limitation. Indeed, they are required to control several degrees of freedom with muscle groups primarily used for elbow actuation. As a result, most of them choose to have a one-degree-of-freedom myoelectric hand for grasping objects, a myoelectric wrist for pronation/supination, and a body-powered elbow. Unlike healthy upper limb movements, the prosthetic elbow joint angle, adjusted prior to the motion, is not involved in the overall upper limb movements, causing the rest of the body to compensate for the lack of mobility of the prosthesis. A promising solution to improve upper limb prosthesis control exploits the residual limb mobility: like in healthy movements, shoulder and prosthetic elbow motions are coupled using inter-joint coordination models. The present study aims to test this approach. A transhumeral amputated individual used a prosthesis with a residual limb motion-driven elbow to point at targets. The prosthetic elbow motion was derived from IMU-based shoulder measurements and a generic model of inter-joint coordinations built from healthy individuals data. For comparison, the participant also performed the task while the prosthetic elbow was implemented with his own myoelectric control strategy. The results show that although the transhumeral amputated participant achieved the pointing task with a better precision when the elbow was myoelectrically-controlled, he had to develop large compensatory trunk movements. Automatic elbow control reduced trunk displacements, and enabled a more natural body behavior with synchronous shoulder and elbow motions. However, due to socket impairments, the residual limb amplitudes were not as large as those of healthy shoulder movements. Therefore, this work also investigates if a control strategy whereby prosthetic joints are automatized according to healthy individuals' coordination models can lead to an intuitive and natural prosthetic control. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5801430 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58014302018-02-16 Can We Achieve Intuitive Prosthetic Elbow Control Based on Healthy Upper Limb Motor Strategies? Merad, Manelle de Montalivet, Étienne Touillet, Amélie Martinet, Noël Roby-Brami, Agnès Jarrassé, Nathanaël Front Neurorobot Neuroscience Most transhumeral amputees report that their prosthetic device lacks functionality, citing the control strategy as a major limitation. Indeed, they are required to control several degrees of freedom with muscle groups primarily used for elbow actuation. As a result, most of them choose to have a one-degree-of-freedom myoelectric hand for grasping objects, a myoelectric wrist for pronation/supination, and a body-powered elbow. Unlike healthy upper limb movements, the prosthetic elbow joint angle, adjusted prior to the motion, is not involved in the overall upper limb movements, causing the rest of the body to compensate for the lack of mobility of the prosthesis. A promising solution to improve upper limb prosthesis control exploits the residual limb mobility: like in healthy movements, shoulder and prosthetic elbow motions are coupled using inter-joint coordination models. The present study aims to test this approach. A transhumeral amputated individual used a prosthesis with a residual limb motion-driven elbow to point at targets. The prosthetic elbow motion was derived from IMU-based shoulder measurements and a generic model of inter-joint coordinations built from healthy individuals data. For comparison, the participant also performed the task while the prosthetic elbow was implemented with his own myoelectric control strategy. The results show that although the transhumeral amputated participant achieved the pointing task with a better precision when the elbow was myoelectrically-controlled, he had to develop large compensatory trunk movements. Automatic elbow control reduced trunk displacements, and enabled a more natural body behavior with synchronous shoulder and elbow motions. However, due to socket impairments, the residual limb amplitudes were not as large as those of healthy shoulder movements. Therefore, this work also investigates if a control strategy whereby prosthetic joints are automatized according to healthy individuals' coordination models can lead to an intuitive and natural prosthetic control. Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5801430/ /pubmed/29456499 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2018.00001 Text en Copyright © 2018 Merad, de Montalivet, Touillet, Martinet, Roby-Brami and Jarrassé. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Merad, Manelle de Montalivet, Étienne Touillet, Amélie Martinet, Noël Roby-Brami, Agnès Jarrassé, Nathanaël Can We Achieve Intuitive Prosthetic Elbow Control Based on Healthy Upper Limb Motor Strategies? |
title | Can We Achieve Intuitive Prosthetic Elbow Control Based on Healthy Upper Limb Motor Strategies? |
title_full | Can We Achieve Intuitive Prosthetic Elbow Control Based on Healthy Upper Limb Motor Strategies? |
title_fullStr | Can We Achieve Intuitive Prosthetic Elbow Control Based on Healthy Upper Limb Motor Strategies? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can We Achieve Intuitive Prosthetic Elbow Control Based on Healthy Upper Limb Motor Strategies? |
title_short | Can We Achieve Intuitive Prosthetic Elbow Control Based on Healthy Upper Limb Motor Strategies? |
title_sort | can we achieve intuitive prosthetic elbow control based on healthy upper limb motor strategies? |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5801430/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29456499 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2018.00001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meradmanelle canweachieveintuitiveprostheticelbowcontrolbasedonhealthyupperlimbmotorstrategies AT demontalivetetienne canweachieveintuitiveprostheticelbowcontrolbasedonhealthyupperlimbmotorstrategies AT touilletamelie canweachieveintuitiveprostheticelbowcontrolbasedonhealthyupperlimbmotorstrategies AT martinetnoel canweachieveintuitiveprostheticelbowcontrolbasedonhealthyupperlimbmotorstrategies AT robybramiagnes canweachieveintuitiveprostheticelbowcontrolbasedonhealthyupperlimbmotorstrategies AT jarrassenathanael canweachieveintuitiveprostheticelbowcontrolbasedonhealthyupperlimbmotorstrategies |