Cargando…

Genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates

BACKGROUND: Genomic prediction of the pig’s response to the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus (PRRSV) would be a useful tool in the swine industry. This study investigated the accuracy of genomic prediction based on porcine SNP60 Beadchip data using training and validation d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waide, Emily H., Tuggle, Christopher K., Serão, Nick V. L., Schroyen, Martine, Hess, Andrew, Rowland, Raymond R. R., Lunney, Joan K., Plastow, Graham, Dekkers, Jack C. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5801659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29390955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0371-4
_version_ 1783298390691414016
author Waide, Emily H.
Tuggle, Christopher K.
Serão, Nick V. L.
Schroyen, Martine
Hess, Andrew
Rowland, Raymond R. R.
Lunney, Joan K.
Plastow, Graham
Dekkers, Jack C. M.
author_facet Waide, Emily H.
Tuggle, Christopher K.
Serão, Nick V. L.
Schroyen, Martine
Hess, Andrew
Rowland, Raymond R. R.
Lunney, Joan K.
Plastow, Graham
Dekkers, Jack C. M.
author_sort Waide, Emily H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genomic prediction of the pig’s response to the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus (PRRSV) would be a useful tool in the swine industry. This study investigated the accuracy of genomic prediction based on porcine SNP60 Beadchip data using training and validation datasets from populations with different genetic backgrounds that were challenged with different PRRSV isolates. RESULTS: Genomic prediction accuracy averaged 0.34 for viral load (VL) and 0.23 for weight gain (WG) following experimental PRRSV challenge, which demonstrates that genomic selection could be used to improve response to PRRSV infection. Training on WG data during infection with a less virulent PRRSV, KS06, resulted in poor accuracy of prediction for WG during infection with a more virulent PRRSV, NVSL. Inclusion of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are in linkage disequilibrium with a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) on chromosome 4 was vital for accurate prediction of VL. Overall, SNPs that were significantly associated with either trait in single SNP genome-wide association analysis were unable to predict the phenotypes with an accuracy as high as that obtained by using all genotyped SNPs across the genome. Inclusion of data from close relatives into the training population increased whole genome prediction accuracy by 33% for VL and by 37% for WG but did not affect the accuracy of prediction when using only SNPs in the major QTL region. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that genomic prediction of response to PRRSV infection is moderately accurate and, when using all SNPs on the porcine SNP60 Beadchip, is not very sensitive to differences in virulence of the PRRSV in training and validation populations. Including close relatives in the training population increased prediction accuracy when using the whole genome or SNPs other than those near a major QTL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5801659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58016592018-02-14 Genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates Waide, Emily H. Tuggle, Christopher K. Serão, Nick V. L. Schroyen, Martine Hess, Andrew Rowland, Raymond R. R. Lunney, Joan K. Plastow, Graham Dekkers, Jack C. M. Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Genomic prediction of the pig’s response to the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus (PRRSV) would be a useful tool in the swine industry. This study investigated the accuracy of genomic prediction based on porcine SNP60 Beadchip data using training and validation datasets from populations with different genetic backgrounds that were challenged with different PRRSV isolates. RESULTS: Genomic prediction accuracy averaged 0.34 for viral load (VL) and 0.23 for weight gain (WG) following experimental PRRSV challenge, which demonstrates that genomic selection could be used to improve response to PRRSV infection. Training on WG data during infection with a less virulent PRRSV, KS06, resulted in poor accuracy of prediction for WG during infection with a more virulent PRRSV, NVSL. Inclusion of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are in linkage disequilibrium with a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) on chromosome 4 was vital for accurate prediction of VL. Overall, SNPs that were significantly associated with either trait in single SNP genome-wide association analysis were unable to predict the phenotypes with an accuracy as high as that obtained by using all genotyped SNPs across the genome. Inclusion of data from close relatives into the training population increased whole genome prediction accuracy by 33% for VL and by 37% for WG but did not affect the accuracy of prediction when using only SNPs in the major QTL region. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that genomic prediction of response to PRRSV infection is moderately accurate and, when using all SNPs on the porcine SNP60 Beadchip, is not very sensitive to differences in virulence of the PRRSV in training and validation populations. Including close relatives in the training population increased prediction accuracy when using the whole genome or SNPs other than those near a major QTL. BioMed Central 2018-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5801659/ /pubmed/29390955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0371-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Waide, Emily H.
Tuggle, Christopher K.
Serão, Nick V. L.
Schroyen, Martine
Hess, Andrew
Rowland, Raymond R. R.
Lunney, Joan K.
Plastow, Graham
Dekkers, Jack C. M.
Genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates
title Genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates
title_full Genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates
title_fullStr Genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates
title_full_unstemmed Genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates
title_short Genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates
title_sort genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5801659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29390955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0371-4
work_keys_str_mv AT waideemilyh genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates
AT tugglechristopherk genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates
AT seraonickvl genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates
AT schroyenmartine genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates
AT hessandrew genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates
AT rowlandraymondrr genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates
AT lunneyjoank genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates
AT plastowgraham genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates
AT dekkersjackcm genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates