Cargando…
Genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates
BACKGROUND: Genomic prediction of the pig’s response to the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus (PRRSV) would be a useful tool in the swine industry. This study investigated the accuracy of genomic prediction based on porcine SNP60 Beadchip data using training and validation d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5801659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29390955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0371-4 |
_version_ | 1783298390691414016 |
---|---|
author | Waide, Emily H. Tuggle, Christopher K. Serão, Nick V. L. Schroyen, Martine Hess, Andrew Rowland, Raymond R. R. Lunney, Joan K. Plastow, Graham Dekkers, Jack C. M. |
author_facet | Waide, Emily H. Tuggle, Christopher K. Serão, Nick V. L. Schroyen, Martine Hess, Andrew Rowland, Raymond R. R. Lunney, Joan K. Plastow, Graham Dekkers, Jack C. M. |
author_sort | Waide, Emily H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Genomic prediction of the pig’s response to the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus (PRRSV) would be a useful tool in the swine industry. This study investigated the accuracy of genomic prediction based on porcine SNP60 Beadchip data using training and validation datasets from populations with different genetic backgrounds that were challenged with different PRRSV isolates. RESULTS: Genomic prediction accuracy averaged 0.34 for viral load (VL) and 0.23 for weight gain (WG) following experimental PRRSV challenge, which demonstrates that genomic selection could be used to improve response to PRRSV infection. Training on WG data during infection with a less virulent PRRSV, KS06, resulted in poor accuracy of prediction for WG during infection with a more virulent PRRSV, NVSL. Inclusion of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are in linkage disequilibrium with a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) on chromosome 4 was vital for accurate prediction of VL. Overall, SNPs that were significantly associated with either trait in single SNP genome-wide association analysis were unable to predict the phenotypes with an accuracy as high as that obtained by using all genotyped SNPs across the genome. Inclusion of data from close relatives into the training population increased whole genome prediction accuracy by 33% for VL and by 37% for WG but did not affect the accuracy of prediction when using only SNPs in the major QTL region. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that genomic prediction of response to PRRSV infection is moderately accurate and, when using all SNPs on the porcine SNP60 Beadchip, is not very sensitive to differences in virulence of the PRRSV in training and validation populations. Including close relatives in the training population increased prediction accuracy when using the whole genome or SNPs other than those near a major QTL. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5801659 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58016592018-02-14 Genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates Waide, Emily H. Tuggle, Christopher K. Serão, Nick V. L. Schroyen, Martine Hess, Andrew Rowland, Raymond R. R. Lunney, Joan K. Plastow, Graham Dekkers, Jack C. M. Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Genomic prediction of the pig’s response to the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus (PRRSV) would be a useful tool in the swine industry. This study investigated the accuracy of genomic prediction based on porcine SNP60 Beadchip data using training and validation datasets from populations with different genetic backgrounds that were challenged with different PRRSV isolates. RESULTS: Genomic prediction accuracy averaged 0.34 for viral load (VL) and 0.23 for weight gain (WG) following experimental PRRSV challenge, which demonstrates that genomic selection could be used to improve response to PRRSV infection. Training on WG data during infection with a less virulent PRRSV, KS06, resulted in poor accuracy of prediction for WG during infection with a more virulent PRRSV, NVSL. Inclusion of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are in linkage disequilibrium with a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) on chromosome 4 was vital for accurate prediction of VL. Overall, SNPs that were significantly associated with either trait in single SNP genome-wide association analysis were unable to predict the phenotypes with an accuracy as high as that obtained by using all genotyped SNPs across the genome. Inclusion of data from close relatives into the training population increased whole genome prediction accuracy by 33% for VL and by 37% for WG but did not affect the accuracy of prediction when using only SNPs in the major QTL region. CONCLUSIONS: Results show that genomic prediction of response to PRRSV infection is moderately accurate and, when using all SNPs on the porcine SNP60 Beadchip, is not very sensitive to differences in virulence of the PRRSV in training and validation populations. Including close relatives in the training population increased prediction accuracy when using the whole genome or SNPs other than those near a major QTL. BioMed Central 2018-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5801659/ /pubmed/29390955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0371-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Waide, Emily H. Tuggle, Christopher K. Serão, Nick V. L. Schroyen, Martine Hess, Andrew Rowland, Raymond R. R. Lunney, Joan K. Plastow, Graham Dekkers, Jack C. M. Genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates |
title | Genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates |
title_full | Genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates |
title_fullStr | Genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates |
title_full_unstemmed | Genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates |
title_short | Genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates |
title_sort | genomic prediction of piglet response to infection with one of two porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus isolates |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5801659/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29390955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0371-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT waideemilyh genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates AT tugglechristopherk genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates AT seraonickvl genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates AT schroyenmartine genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates AT hessandrew genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates AT rowlandraymondrr genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates AT lunneyjoank genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates AT plastowgraham genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates AT dekkersjackcm genomicpredictionofpigletresponsetoinfectionwithoneoftwoporcinereproductiveandrespiratorysyndromevirusisolates |