Cargando…

The effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay

INTRODUCTION: The in vivo comet assay is a widely used genotoxicity test that can detect DNA damage in a range of organs. It is included in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. However, various protocols are still used for this assay, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kyoya, Takahiro, Iwamoto, Rika, Shimanura, Yuko, Terada, Megumi, Masuda, Shuichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5801904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41021-017-0092-x
_version_ 1783298432952172544
author Kyoya, Takahiro
Iwamoto, Rika
Shimanura, Yuko
Terada, Megumi
Masuda, Shuichi
author_facet Kyoya, Takahiro
Iwamoto, Rika
Shimanura, Yuko
Terada, Megumi
Masuda, Shuichi
author_sort Kyoya, Takahiro
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The in vivo comet assay is a widely used genotoxicity test that can detect DNA damage in a range of organs. It is included in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. However, various protocols are still used for this assay, and several different image analyzers are used routinely to evaluate the results. Here, we verified a protocol that largely contributes to the equivalence of results, and we assessed the effect on the results when slides made from the same sample were analyzed using two different image analyzers (Comet Assay IV vs Comet Analyzer). FINDINGS: Standardizing the agarose concentrations and DNA unwinding and electrophoresis times had a large impact on the equivalence of the results between the different methods used for the in vivo comet assay. In addition, there was some variation in the sensitivity of the two different image analyzers tested; however this variation was considered to be minor and became negligible when the test conditions were standardized between the two different methods. CONCLUSION: By standardizing the concentrations of low melting agarose and DNA unwinding and electrophoresis times between both methods used in the current study, the sensitivity to detect the genotoxicity of a positive control substance in the in vivo comet assay became generally comparable, independently of the image analyzer used. However, there may still be the possibility that other conditions, except for the three described here, could affect the reproducibility of the in vivo comet assay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5801904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58019042018-02-14 The effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay Kyoya, Takahiro Iwamoto, Rika Shimanura, Yuko Terada, Megumi Masuda, Shuichi Genes Environ Short Report INTRODUCTION: The in vivo comet assay is a widely used genotoxicity test that can detect DNA damage in a range of organs. It is included in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. However, various protocols are still used for this assay, and several different image analyzers are used routinely to evaluate the results. Here, we verified a protocol that largely contributes to the equivalence of results, and we assessed the effect on the results when slides made from the same sample were analyzed using two different image analyzers (Comet Assay IV vs Comet Analyzer). FINDINGS: Standardizing the agarose concentrations and DNA unwinding and electrophoresis times had a large impact on the equivalence of the results between the different methods used for the in vivo comet assay. In addition, there was some variation in the sensitivity of the two different image analyzers tested; however this variation was considered to be minor and became negligible when the test conditions were standardized between the two different methods. CONCLUSION: By standardizing the concentrations of low melting agarose and DNA unwinding and electrophoresis times between both methods used in the current study, the sensitivity to detect the genotoxicity of a positive control substance in the in vivo comet assay became generally comparable, independently of the image analyzer used. However, there may still be the possibility that other conditions, except for the three described here, could affect the reproducibility of the in vivo comet assay. BioMed Central 2018-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5801904/ /pubmed/29445426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41021-017-0092-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Short Report
Kyoya, Takahiro
Iwamoto, Rika
Shimanura, Yuko
Terada, Megumi
Masuda, Shuichi
The effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay
title The effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay
title_full The effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay
title_fullStr The effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay
title_full_unstemmed The effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay
title_short The effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay
title_sort effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5801904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41021-017-0092-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kyoyatakahiro theeffectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay
AT iwamotorika theeffectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay
AT shimanurayuko theeffectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay
AT teradamegumi theeffectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay
AT masudashuichi theeffectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay
AT kyoyatakahiro effectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay
AT iwamotorika effectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay
AT shimanurayuko effectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay
AT teradamegumi effectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay
AT masudashuichi effectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay