Cargando…
The effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay
INTRODUCTION: The in vivo comet assay is a widely used genotoxicity test that can detect DNA damage in a range of organs. It is included in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. However, various protocols are still used for this assay, an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5801904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41021-017-0092-x |
_version_ | 1783298432952172544 |
---|---|
author | Kyoya, Takahiro Iwamoto, Rika Shimanura, Yuko Terada, Megumi Masuda, Shuichi |
author_facet | Kyoya, Takahiro Iwamoto, Rika Shimanura, Yuko Terada, Megumi Masuda, Shuichi |
author_sort | Kyoya, Takahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The in vivo comet assay is a widely used genotoxicity test that can detect DNA damage in a range of organs. It is included in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. However, various protocols are still used for this assay, and several different image analyzers are used routinely to evaluate the results. Here, we verified a protocol that largely contributes to the equivalence of results, and we assessed the effect on the results when slides made from the same sample were analyzed using two different image analyzers (Comet Assay IV vs Comet Analyzer). FINDINGS: Standardizing the agarose concentrations and DNA unwinding and electrophoresis times had a large impact on the equivalence of the results between the different methods used for the in vivo comet assay. In addition, there was some variation in the sensitivity of the two different image analyzers tested; however this variation was considered to be minor and became negligible when the test conditions were standardized between the two different methods. CONCLUSION: By standardizing the concentrations of low melting agarose and DNA unwinding and electrophoresis times between both methods used in the current study, the sensitivity to detect the genotoxicity of a positive control substance in the in vivo comet assay became generally comparable, independently of the image analyzer used. However, there may still be the possibility that other conditions, except for the three described here, could affect the reproducibility of the in vivo comet assay. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5801904 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58019042018-02-14 The effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay Kyoya, Takahiro Iwamoto, Rika Shimanura, Yuko Terada, Megumi Masuda, Shuichi Genes Environ Short Report INTRODUCTION: The in vivo comet assay is a widely used genotoxicity test that can detect DNA damage in a range of organs. It is included in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. However, various protocols are still used for this assay, and several different image analyzers are used routinely to evaluate the results. Here, we verified a protocol that largely contributes to the equivalence of results, and we assessed the effect on the results when slides made from the same sample were analyzed using two different image analyzers (Comet Assay IV vs Comet Analyzer). FINDINGS: Standardizing the agarose concentrations and DNA unwinding and electrophoresis times had a large impact on the equivalence of the results between the different methods used for the in vivo comet assay. In addition, there was some variation in the sensitivity of the two different image analyzers tested; however this variation was considered to be minor and became negligible when the test conditions were standardized between the two different methods. CONCLUSION: By standardizing the concentrations of low melting agarose and DNA unwinding and electrophoresis times between both methods used in the current study, the sensitivity to detect the genotoxicity of a positive control substance in the in vivo comet assay became generally comparable, independently of the image analyzer used. However, there may still be the possibility that other conditions, except for the three described here, could affect the reproducibility of the in vivo comet assay. BioMed Central 2018-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5801904/ /pubmed/29445426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41021-017-0092-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Kyoya, Takahiro Iwamoto, Rika Shimanura, Yuko Terada, Megumi Masuda, Shuichi The effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay |
title | The effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay |
title_full | The effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay |
title_fullStr | The effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay |
title_short | The effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay |
title_sort | effect of different methods and image analyzers on the results of the in vivo comet assay |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5801904/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41021-017-0092-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kyoyatakahiro theeffectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay AT iwamotorika theeffectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay AT shimanurayuko theeffectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay AT teradamegumi theeffectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay AT masudashuichi theeffectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay AT kyoyatakahiro effectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay AT iwamotorika effectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay AT shimanurayuko effectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay AT teradamegumi effectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay AT masudashuichi effectofdifferentmethodsandimageanalyzersontheresultsoftheinvivocometassay |