Cargando…
Prognostic assessment for patients with cancer and incidental pulmonary embolism
BACKGROUND: An incidental/unsuspected diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (IPE) in cancer patients is a frequent occurrence. This single-institution analysis of uniformly managed patients investigates short and long-term outcomes and proposes a prognostic risk score, aiming to assist clinical decision-m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5802055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-017-0157-x |
_version_ | 1783298466155331584 |
---|---|
author | Bozas, George Jeffery, Natalie Ramanujam-Venkatachala, Deiva Avery, Ged Stephens, Andrew Moss, Hilary Palmer, June Elliott, Mandi Maraveyas, Anthony |
author_facet | Bozas, George Jeffery, Natalie Ramanujam-Venkatachala, Deiva Avery, Ged Stephens, Andrew Moss, Hilary Palmer, June Elliott, Mandi Maraveyas, Anthony |
author_sort | Bozas, George |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An incidental/unsuspected diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (IPE) in cancer patients is a frequent occurrence. This single-institution analysis of uniformly managed patients investigates short and long-term outcomes and proposes a prognostic risk score, aiming to assist clinical decision-making. METHODS: Data from a prospectively recorded cohort of 234 consecutive cancer patients with IPE were analysed. Multivariate logistic regression and the Cox regression survival methods were used to identify factors with independent association with early (30-day, 3-month, 6-month) mortality and survival. Receiver operator characteristic analysis (ROC) was used to assess appropriate cut-offs for continuous variables and the fitness of prognostic scoring. RESULTS: 30-day, 3-month and 6-month mortality was 3.4% (n = 8), 15% (n = 35) and 31% (n = 72) respectively. Recurrence during anticoagulation occurred in 2.6% (n = 6) and major haemorrhage in 2.1% (n = 5) of the patients. A prognostic score incorporating performance status (0 vs 1–2 vs 3–4) and the presence of new or worsening symptoms, with and without the consideration of the presence of incurable malignancy, correlated with overall survival (p < .001 respectively) as well as early mortality (AUC = .821, p = .004 and AUC = .805, p = 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSION: A simple prognostic score incorporating basic oncologic clinical assessment and self-reported symptomatology could reliably stratify the mortality risk of ambulant cancer patients and IPE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Audit registration No. 2013.287, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals Trust, 29/11/2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12959-017-0157-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5802055 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58020552018-02-14 Prognostic assessment for patients with cancer and incidental pulmonary embolism Bozas, George Jeffery, Natalie Ramanujam-Venkatachala, Deiva Avery, Ged Stephens, Andrew Moss, Hilary Palmer, June Elliott, Mandi Maraveyas, Anthony Thromb J Research BACKGROUND: An incidental/unsuspected diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (IPE) in cancer patients is a frequent occurrence. This single-institution analysis of uniformly managed patients investigates short and long-term outcomes and proposes a prognostic risk score, aiming to assist clinical decision-making. METHODS: Data from a prospectively recorded cohort of 234 consecutive cancer patients with IPE were analysed. Multivariate logistic regression and the Cox regression survival methods were used to identify factors with independent association with early (30-day, 3-month, 6-month) mortality and survival. Receiver operator characteristic analysis (ROC) was used to assess appropriate cut-offs for continuous variables and the fitness of prognostic scoring. RESULTS: 30-day, 3-month and 6-month mortality was 3.4% (n = 8), 15% (n = 35) and 31% (n = 72) respectively. Recurrence during anticoagulation occurred in 2.6% (n = 6) and major haemorrhage in 2.1% (n = 5) of the patients. A prognostic score incorporating performance status (0 vs 1–2 vs 3–4) and the presence of new or worsening symptoms, with and without the consideration of the presence of incurable malignancy, correlated with overall survival (p < .001 respectively) as well as early mortality (AUC = .821, p = .004 and AUC = .805, p = 0.006, respectively). CONCLUSION: A simple prognostic score incorporating basic oncologic clinical assessment and self-reported symptomatology could reliably stratify the mortality risk of ambulant cancer patients and IPE. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Audit registration No. 2013.287, Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals Trust, 29/11/2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12959-017-0157-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5802055/ /pubmed/29445314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-017-0157-x Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Bozas, George Jeffery, Natalie Ramanujam-Venkatachala, Deiva Avery, Ged Stephens, Andrew Moss, Hilary Palmer, June Elliott, Mandi Maraveyas, Anthony Prognostic assessment for patients with cancer and incidental pulmonary embolism |
title | Prognostic assessment for patients with cancer and incidental pulmonary embolism |
title_full | Prognostic assessment for patients with cancer and incidental pulmonary embolism |
title_fullStr | Prognostic assessment for patients with cancer and incidental pulmonary embolism |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic assessment for patients with cancer and incidental pulmonary embolism |
title_short | Prognostic assessment for patients with cancer and incidental pulmonary embolism |
title_sort | prognostic assessment for patients with cancer and incidental pulmonary embolism |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5802055/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29445314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12959-017-0157-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bozasgeorge prognosticassessmentforpatientswithcancerandincidentalpulmonaryembolism AT jefferynatalie prognosticassessmentforpatientswithcancerandincidentalpulmonaryembolism AT ramanujamvenkatachaladeiva prognosticassessmentforpatientswithcancerandincidentalpulmonaryembolism AT averyged prognosticassessmentforpatientswithcancerandincidentalpulmonaryembolism AT stephensandrew prognosticassessmentforpatientswithcancerandincidentalpulmonaryembolism AT mosshilary prognosticassessmentforpatientswithcancerandincidentalpulmonaryembolism AT palmerjune prognosticassessmentforpatientswithcancerandincidentalpulmonaryembolism AT elliottmandi prognosticassessmentforpatientswithcancerandincidentalpulmonaryembolism AT maraveyasanthony prognosticassessmentforpatientswithcancerandincidentalpulmonaryembolism |