Cargando…
Analysis of the joint effect of SNPs to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia GWAS data
We have tested published methods for capturing allelic heterogeneity and identifying loci of joint effects to uncover more of the “hidden heritability” of schizophrenia (SCZ). We used two tools, cojo-GCTA and multi-SNP, to analyze meta-statistics from the latest genome-wide association study (GWAS)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5802566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29249828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0033-2 |
_version_ | 1783298545436065792 |
---|---|
author | Polushina, Tatiana Giddaluru, Sudheer Bettella, Francesco Espeseth, Thomas Lundervold, Astri J. Djurovic, Srdjan Cichon, Sven Hoffmann, Per Nöthen, Markus M. Steen, Vidar M. Andreassen, Ole A. Le Hellard, Stéphanie |
author_facet | Polushina, Tatiana Giddaluru, Sudheer Bettella, Francesco Espeseth, Thomas Lundervold, Astri J. Djurovic, Srdjan Cichon, Sven Hoffmann, Per Nöthen, Markus M. Steen, Vidar M. Andreassen, Ole A. Le Hellard, Stéphanie |
author_sort | Polushina, Tatiana |
collection | PubMed |
description | We have tested published methods for capturing allelic heterogeneity and identifying loci of joint effects to uncover more of the “hidden heritability” of schizophrenia (SCZ). We used two tools, cojo-GCTA and multi-SNP, to analyze meta-statistics from the latest genome-wide association study (GWAS) on SCZ by the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC). Stepwise regression on markers with p values <10(−7) in cojo-GCTA identified 96 independent signals. Eighty-five passed the genome-wide significance threshold. Cross-validation of cojo-GCTA by CLUMP was 76%, i.e., 26 of the loci identified by the PGC using CLUMP were found to be dependent on another locus by cojo-GCTA. The overlap between cojo-GCTA and multi-SNP was better (up to 92%). Three markers reached genome-wide significance (5 × 10(−8)) in a joint effect model. In addition, two loci showed possible allelic heterogeneity within 1-Mb genomic regions, while CLUMP analysis had identified 16 such regions. Cojo-GCTA identified fewer independent loci than CLUMP and seems to be more conservative, probably because it accounts for long-range LD and interaction effects between markers. These findings also explain why fewer loci with possible allelic heterogeneity remained significant after cojo-GCTA analysis. With multi-SNP, 86 markers were selected at the threshold 10(−7). Multi-SNP identifies fewer independent signals, due to splitting of the data and use of smaller samples. We recommend that cojo-GCTA and multi-SNP are used for post-GWAS analysis of all traits to call independent loci. We conclude that only a few loci in SCZ show joint effects or allelic heterogeneity, but this could be due to lack of power for that data set. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5802566 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58025662018-02-08 Analysis of the joint effect of SNPs to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia GWAS data Polushina, Tatiana Giddaluru, Sudheer Bettella, Francesco Espeseth, Thomas Lundervold, Astri J. Djurovic, Srdjan Cichon, Sven Hoffmann, Per Nöthen, Markus M. Steen, Vidar M. Andreassen, Ole A. Le Hellard, Stéphanie Transl Psychiatry Article We have tested published methods for capturing allelic heterogeneity and identifying loci of joint effects to uncover more of the “hidden heritability” of schizophrenia (SCZ). We used two tools, cojo-GCTA and multi-SNP, to analyze meta-statistics from the latest genome-wide association study (GWAS) on SCZ by the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC). Stepwise regression on markers with p values <10(−7) in cojo-GCTA identified 96 independent signals. Eighty-five passed the genome-wide significance threshold. Cross-validation of cojo-GCTA by CLUMP was 76%, i.e., 26 of the loci identified by the PGC using CLUMP were found to be dependent on another locus by cojo-GCTA. The overlap between cojo-GCTA and multi-SNP was better (up to 92%). Three markers reached genome-wide significance (5 × 10(−8)) in a joint effect model. In addition, two loci showed possible allelic heterogeneity within 1-Mb genomic regions, while CLUMP analysis had identified 16 such regions. Cojo-GCTA identified fewer independent loci than CLUMP and seems to be more conservative, probably because it accounts for long-range LD and interaction effects between markers. These findings also explain why fewer loci with possible allelic heterogeneity remained significant after cojo-GCTA analysis. With multi-SNP, 86 markers were selected at the threshold 10(−7). Multi-SNP identifies fewer independent signals, due to splitting of the data and use of smaller samples. We recommend that cojo-GCTA and multi-SNP are used for post-GWAS analysis of all traits to call independent loci. We conclude that only a few loci in SCZ show joint effects or allelic heterogeneity, but this could be due to lack of power for that data set. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5802566/ /pubmed/29249828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0033-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Polushina, Tatiana Giddaluru, Sudheer Bettella, Francesco Espeseth, Thomas Lundervold, Astri J. Djurovic, Srdjan Cichon, Sven Hoffmann, Per Nöthen, Markus M. Steen, Vidar M. Andreassen, Ole A. Le Hellard, Stéphanie Analysis of the joint effect of SNPs to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia GWAS data |
title | Analysis of the joint effect of SNPs to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia GWAS data |
title_full | Analysis of the joint effect of SNPs to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia GWAS data |
title_fullStr | Analysis of the joint effect of SNPs to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia GWAS data |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of the joint effect of SNPs to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia GWAS data |
title_short | Analysis of the joint effect of SNPs to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia GWAS data |
title_sort | analysis of the joint effect of snps to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia gwas data |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5802566/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29249828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0033-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polushinatatiana analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata AT giddalurusudheer analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata AT bettellafrancesco analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata AT espeseththomas analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata AT lundervoldastrij analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata AT djurovicsrdjan analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata AT cichonsven analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata AT hoffmannper analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata AT nothenmarkusm analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata AT steenvidarm analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata AT andreassenolea analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata AT lehellardstephanie analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata |