Cargando…

Analysis of the joint effect of SNPs to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia GWAS data

We have tested published methods for capturing allelic heterogeneity and identifying loci of joint effects to uncover more of the “hidden heritability” of schizophrenia (SCZ). We used two tools, cojo-GCTA and multi-SNP, to analyze meta-statistics from the latest genome-wide association study (GWAS)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Polushina, Tatiana, Giddaluru, Sudheer, Bettella, Francesco, Espeseth, Thomas, Lundervold, Astri J., Djurovic, Srdjan, Cichon, Sven, Hoffmann, Per, Nöthen, Markus M., Steen, Vidar M., Andreassen, Ole A., Le Hellard, Stéphanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5802566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29249828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0033-2
_version_ 1783298545436065792
author Polushina, Tatiana
Giddaluru, Sudheer
Bettella, Francesco
Espeseth, Thomas
Lundervold, Astri J.
Djurovic, Srdjan
Cichon, Sven
Hoffmann, Per
Nöthen, Markus M.
Steen, Vidar M.
Andreassen, Ole A.
Le Hellard, Stéphanie
author_facet Polushina, Tatiana
Giddaluru, Sudheer
Bettella, Francesco
Espeseth, Thomas
Lundervold, Astri J.
Djurovic, Srdjan
Cichon, Sven
Hoffmann, Per
Nöthen, Markus M.
Steen, Vidar M.
Andreassen, Ole A.
Le Hellard, Stéphanie
author_sort Polushina, Tatiana
collection PubMed
description We have tested published methods for capturing allelic heterogeneity and identifying loci of joint effects to uncover more of the “hidden heritability” of schizophrenia (SCZ). We used two tools, cojo-GCTA and multi-SNP, to analyze meta-statistics from the latest genome-wide association study (GWAS) on SCZ by the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC). Stepwise regression on markers with p values <10(−7) in cojo-GCTA identified 96 independent signals. Eighty-five passed the genome-wide significance threshold. Cross-validation of cojo-GCTA by CLUMP was 76%, i.e., 26 of the loci identified by the PGC using CLUMP were found to be dependent on another locus by cojo-GCTA. The overlap between cojo-GCTA and multi-SNP was better (up to 92%). Three markers reached genome-wide significance (5 × 10(−8)) in a joint effect model. In addition, two loci showed possible allelic heterogeneity within 1-Mb genomic regions, while CLUMP analysis had identified 16 such regions. Cojo-GCTA identified fewer independent loci than CLUMP and seems to be more conservative, probably because it accounts for long-range LD and interaction effects between markers. These findings also explain why fewer loci with possible allelic heterogeneity remained significant after cojo-GCTA analysis. With multi-SNP, 86 markers were selected at the threshold 10(−7). Multi-SNP identifies fewer independent signals, due to splitting of the data and use of smaller samples. We recommend that cojo-GCTA and multi-SNP are used for post-GWAS analysis of all traits to call independent loci. We conclude that only a few loci in SCZ show joint effects or allelic heterogeneity, but this could be due to lack of power for that data set.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5802566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58025662018-02-08 Analysis of the joint effect of SNPs to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia GWAS data Polushina, Tatiana Giddaluru, Sudheer Bettella, Francesco Espeseth, Thomas Lundervold, Astri J. Djurovic, Srdjan Cichon, Sven Hoffmann, Per Nöthen, Markus M. Steen, Vidar M. Andreassen, Ole A. Le Hellard, Stéphanie Transl Psychiatry Article We have tested published methods for capturing allelic heterogeneity and identifying loci of joint effects to uncover more of the “hidden heritability” of schizophrenia (SCZ). We used two tools, cojo-GCTA and multi-SNP, to analyze meta-statistics from the latest genome-wide association study (GWAS) on SCZ by the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC). Stepwise regression on markers with p values <10(−7) in cojo-GCTA identified 96 independent signals. Eighty-five passed the genome-wide significance threshold. Cross-validation of cojo-GCTA by CLUMP was 76%, i.e., 26 of the loci identified by the PGC using CLUMP were found to be dependent on another locus by cojo-GCTA. The overlap between cojo-GCTA and multi-SNP was better (up to 92%). Three markers reached genome-wide significance (5 × 10(−8)) in a joint effect model. In addition, two loci showed possible allelic heterogeneity within 1-Mb genomic regions, while CLUMP analysis had identified 16 such regions. Cojo-GCTA identified fewer independent loci than CLUMP and seems to be more conservative, probably because it accounts for long-range LD and interaction effects between markers. These findings also explain why fewer loci with possible allelic heterogeneity remained significant after cojo-GCTA analysis. With multi-SNP, 86 markers were selected at the threshold 10(−7). Multi-SNP identifies fewer independent signals, due to splitting of the data and use of smaller samples. We recommend that cojo-GCTA and multi-SNP are used for post-GWAS analysis of all traits to call independent loci. We conclude that only a few loci in SCZ show joint effects or allelic heterogeneity, but this could be due to lack of power for that data set. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5802566/ /pubmed/29249828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0033-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Polushina, Tatiana
Giddaluru, Sudheer
Bettella, Francesco
Espeseth, Thomas
Lundervold, Astri J.
Djurovic, Srdjan
Cichon, Sven
Hoffmann, Per
Nöthen, Markus M.
Steen, Vidar M.
Andreassen, Ole A.
Le Hellard, Stéphanie
Analysis of the joint effect of SNPs to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia GWAS data
title Analysis of the joint effect of SNPs to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia GWAS data
title_full Analysis of the joint effect of SNPs to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia GWAS data
title_fullStr Analysis of the joint effect of SNPs to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia GWAS data
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the joint effect of SNPs to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia GWAS data
title_short Analysis of the joint effect of SNPs to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia GWAS data
title_sort analysis of the joint effect of snps to identify independent loci and allelic heterogeneity in schizophrenia gwas data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5802566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29249828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0033-2
work_keys_str_mv AT polushinatatiana analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata
AT giddalurusudheer analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata
AT bettellafrancesco analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata
AT espeseththomas analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata
AT lundervoldastrij analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata
AT djurovicsrdjan analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata
AT cichonsven analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata
AT hoffmannper analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata
AT nothenmarkusm analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata
AT steenvidarm analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata
AT andreassenolea analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata
AT lehellardstephanie analysisofthejointeffectofsnpstoidentifyindependentlociandallelicheterogeneityinschizophreniagwasdata