Cargando…

Rates and risk factors for human cutaneous anthrax in the country of Georgia: National surveillance data, 2008–2015

INTRODUCTION: Anthrax is endemic in the country of Georgia. The most common cutaneous anthrax form accounts for 95% of anthrax cases and often is self-resolving. Humans are infected from processing contaminated animal products, contacting sick animals, or by insect bites. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to desc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasradze, Ana, Echeverria, Diana, Zakhashvili, Khatuna, Bautista, Christian, Heyer, Nicholas, Imnadze, Paata, Mitrskhulava, Veriko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5802846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29415029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192031
_version_ 1783298601726771200
author Kasradze, Ana
Echeverria, Diana
Zakhashvili, Khatuna
Bautista, Christian
Heyer, Nicholas
Imnadze, Paata
Mitrskhulava, Veriko
author_facet Kasradze, Ana
Echeverria, Diana
Zakhashvili, Khatuna
Bautista, Christian
Heyer, Nicholas
Imnadze, Paata
Mitrskhulava, Veriko
author_sort Kasradze, Ana
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Anthrax is endemic in the country of Georgia. The most common cutaneous anthrax form accounts for 95% of anthrax cases and often is self-resolving. Humans are infected from processing contaminated animal products, contacting sick animals, or by insect bites. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the burden of human cutaneous anthrax and associated risk factors using the national surveillance data. METHODS: We extracted all human cutaneous anthrax cases from Electronic Integrated Disease Surveillance System (EIDSS) from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2015. We conducted descriptive analyses to characterize the number of confirmed, probable and suspected cases by age groups, gender, ethnicity, year and geographic area. RESULTS: Out of 911 reported cutaneous anthrax cases, 299 (33%) were rejected. Out of remaining 612 cases, 437 (71%), 172 (28%), and 3 (<0.004%) were classified as confirmed, probable and suspected cases of cutaneous Anthrax, respectively; 467 (76.3%) were male. Georgians accounted for 56% (343/612) of cutaneous anthrax cases. Handling animal products (aOR 4.36, 95% CI 2.61–7.26) and living near pastoralist routes (aOR 2.74, 95%CI 1.57–4.76) were associated with cutaneous anthrax. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides eight-year trends for cutaneous anthrax in humans in the country of Georgia. A comprehensive explanation for the observed rise and fall of the incidence rates of human cutaneous anthrax in 2008–2015 remains to be clarified but is likely associated with discontinuation of mandatory national livestock vaccination in 2008 coupled with weakened human and animal national health systems which were disrupted after the Soviet Union collapsed. Our analysis identifies living near pastoralist routes, handling animal products and travel to endemic areas within two weeks before the disease onset as risk factors for cutaneous anthrax. The evidence underscores the importance of One Health recommendations to activate anthrax awareness campaigns, supervise the destruction of known anthrax carcasses, record global position system coordinates of sites and disinfect infected soils and introduce a participatory health education tool on anthrax.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5802846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58028462018-02-23 Rates and risk factors for human cutaneous anthrax in the country of Georgia: National surveillance data, 2008–2015 Kasradze, Ana Echeverria, Diana Zakhashvili, Khatuna Bautista, Christian Heyer, Nicholas Imnadze, Paata Mitrskhulava, Veriko PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Anthrax is endemic in the country of Georgia. The most common cutaneous anthrax form accounts for 95% of anthrax cases and often is self-resolving. Humans are infected from processing contaminated animal products, contacting sick animals, or by insect bites. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the burden of human cutaneous anthrax and associated risk factors using the national surveillance data. METHODS: We extracted all human cutaneous anthrax cases from Electronic Integrated Disease Surveillance System (EIDSS) from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2015. We conducted descriptive analyses to characterize the number of confirmed, probable and suspected cases by age groups, gender, ethnicity, year and geographic area. RESULTS: Out of 911 reported cutaneous anthrax cases, 299 (33%) were rejected. Out of remaining 612 cases, 437 (71%), 172 (28%), and 3 (<0.004%) were classified as confirmed, probable and suspected cases of cutaneous Anthrax, respectively; 467 (76.3%) were male. Georgians accounted for 56% (343/612) of cutaneous anthrax cases. Handling animal products (aOR 4.36, 95% CI 2.61–7.26) and living near pastoralist routes (aOR 2.74, 95%CI 1.57–4.76) were associated with cutaneous anthrax. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides eight-year trends for cutaneous anthrax in humans in the country of Georgia. A comprehensive explanation for the observed rise and fall of the incidence rates of human cutaneous anthrax in 2008–2015 remains to be clarified but is likely associated with discontinuation of mandatory national livestock vaccination in 2008 coupled with weakened human and animal national health systems which were disrupted after the Soviet Union collapsed. Our analysis identifies living near pastoralist routes, handling animal products and travel to endemic areas within two weeks before the disease onset as risk factors for cutaneous anthrax. The evidence underscores the importance of One Health recommendations to activate anthrax awareness campaigns, supervise the destruction of known anthrax carcasses, record global position system coordinates of sites and disinfect infected soils and introduce a participatory health education tool on anthrax. Public Library of Science 2018-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5802846/ /pubmed/29415029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192031 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kasradze, Ana
Echeverria, Diana
Zakhashvili, Khatuna
Bautista, Christian
Heyer, Nicholas
Imnadze, Paata
Mitrskhulava, Veriko
Rates and risk factors for human cutaneous anthrax in the country of Georgia: National surveillance data, 2008–2015
title Rates and risk factors for human cutaneous anthrax in the country of Georgia: National surveillance data, 2008–2015
title_full Rates and risk factors for human cutaneous anthrax in the country of Georgia: National surveillance data, 2008–2015
title_fullStr Rates and risk factors for human cutaneous anthrax in the country of Georgia: National surveillance data, 2008–2015
title_full_unstemmed Rates and risk factors for human cutaneous anthrax in the country of Georgia: National surveillance data, 2008–2015
title_short Rates and risk factors for human cutaneous anthrax in the country of Georgia: National surveillance data, 2008–2015
title_sort rates and risk factors for human cutaneous anthrax in the country of georgia: national surveillance data, 2008–2015
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5802846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29415029
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192031
work_keys_str_mv AT kasradzeana ratesandriskfactorsforhumancutaneousanthraxinthecountryofgeorgianationalsurveillancedata20082015
AT echeverriadiana ratesandriskfactorsforhumancutaneousanthraxinthecountryofgeorgianationalsurveillancedata20082015
AT zakhashvilikhatuna ratesandriskfactorsforhumancutaneousanthraxinthecountryofgeorgianationalsurveillancedata20082015
AT bautistachristian ratesandriskfactorsforhumancutaneousanthraxinthecountryofgeorgianationalsurveillancedata20082015
AT heyernicholas ratesandriskfactorsforhumancutaneousanthraxinthecountryofgeorgianationalsurveillancedata20082015
AT imnadzepaata ratesandriskfactorsforhumancutaneousanthraxinthecountryofgeorgianationalsurveillancedata20082015
AT mitrskhulavaveriko ratesandriskfactorsforhumancutaneousanthraxinthecountryofgeorgianationalsurveillancedata20082015