Cargando…
Evaluating the effect of the Practical Approach to Care Kit on teaching medical students primary care: Quasi-experimental study
BACKGROUND: South Africa is committed to health reforms that strengthen primary health care. Preparing future doctors to work in primary care teams with other professionals is a priority, and medical schools have shifted towards community-based and decentralised training of medical students. AIM: To...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AOSIS
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5803519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29227134 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v9i1.1602 |
_version_ | 1783298670331953152 |
---|---|
author | Mash, Robert Pather, Michael Rhode, Hilary Fairall, Lara |
author_facet | Mash, Robert Pather, Michael Rhode, Hilary Fairall, Lara |
author_sort | Mash, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: South Africa is committed to health reforms that strengthen primary health care. Preparing future doctors to work in primary care teams with other professionals is a priority, and medical schools have shifted towards community-based and decentralised training of medical students. AIM: To evaluate the effect on student performance of the Practical Approach to Care Kit (PACK) (an integrated decision-making tool for adult primary care) during the final phase of medical student training at Stellenbosch University. SETTING: Clinical rotations in family medicine at clinics in the Western Cape. METHODS: Mixed methods involving a quasi-experimental study and focus group interviews. Student examination performance was compared between groups with and without exposure to the PACK during their clinical training. Student groups exposed to PACK were interviewed at the end of their rotations. RESULTS: Student performance in examinations was significantly better in those exposed to the PACK. Students varied from using the PACK overtly or covertly during the consultation to checking up on decisions made after the consultation. Some felt that the PACK was more suitable for nurses or more junior students. Although tutors openly endorsed PACK, very few modelled the use of PACK in their clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The use of PACK in the final phase of undergraduate medical education improved their performance in primary care. Students might be more accepting and find the tool more useful in the earlier clinical rotations. Supervisors should be trained further in how to incorporate the use of the PACK in their practice and educational conversations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5803519 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | AOSIS |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58035192018-02-12 Evaluating the effect of the Practical Approach to Care Kit on teaching medical students primary care: Quasi-experimental study Mash, Robert Pather, Michael Rhode, Hilary Fairall, Lara Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med Original Research BACKGROUND: South Africa is committed to health reforms that strengthen primary health care. Preparing future doctors to work in primary care teams with other professionals is a priority, and medical schools have shifted towards community-based and decentralised training of medical students. AIM: To evaluate the effect on student performance of the Practical Approach to Care Kit (PACK) (an integrated decision-making tool for adult primary care) during the final phase of medical student training at Stellenbosch University. SETTING: Clinical rotations in family medicine at clinics in the Western Cape. METHODS: Mixed methods involving a quasi-experimental study and focus group interviews. Student examination performance was compared between groups with and without exposure to the PACK during their clinical training. Student groups exposed to PACK were interviewed at the end of their rotations. RESULTS: Student performance in examinations was significantly better in those exposed to the PACK. Students varied from using the PACK overtly or covertly during the consultation to checking up on decisions made after the consultation. Some felt that the PACK was more suitable for nurses or more junior students. Although tutors openly endorsed PACK, very few modelled the use of PACK in their clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The use of PACK in the final phase of undergraduate medical education improved their performance in primary care. Students might be more accepting and find the tool more useful in the earlier clinical rotations. Supervisors should be trained further in how to incorporate the use of the PACK in their practice and educational conversations. AOSIS 2017-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5803519/ /pubmed/29227134 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v9i1.1602 Text en © 2017. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Mash, Robert Pather, Michael Rhode, Hilary Fairall, Lara Evaluating the effect of the Practical Approach to Care Kit on teaching medical students primary care: Quasi-experimental study |
title | Evaluating the effect of the Practical Approach to Care Kit on teaching medical students primary care: Quasi-experimental study |
title_full | Evaluating the effect of the Practical Approach to Care Kit on teaching medical students primary care: Quasi-experimental study |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the effect of the Practical Approach to Care Kit on teaching medical students primary care: Quasi-experimental study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the effect of the Practical Approach to Care Kit on teaching medical students primary care: Quasi-experimental study |
title_short | Evaluating the effect of the Practical Approach to Care Kit on teaching medical students primary care: Quasi-experimental study |
title_sort | evaluating the effect of the practical approach to care kit on teaching medical students primary care: quasi-experimental study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5803519/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29227134 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v9i1.1602 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mashrobert evaluatingtheeffectofthepracticalapproachtocarekitonteachingmedicalstudentsprimarycarequasiexperimentalstudy AT pathermichael evaluatingtheeffectofthepracticalapproachtocarekitonteachingmedicalstudentsprimarycarequasiexperimentalstudy AT rhodehilary evaluatingtheeffectofthepracticalapproachtocarekitonteachingmedicalstudentsprimarycarequasiexperimentalstudy AT fairalllara evaluatingtheeffectofthepracticalapproachtocarekitonteachingmedicalstudentsprimarycarequasiexperimentalstudy |