Cargando…

Evaluating the effect of the Practical Approach to Care Kit on teaching medical students primary care: Quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND: South Africa is committed to health reforms that strengthen primary health care. Preparing future doctors to work in primary care teams with other professionals is a priority, and medical schools have shifted towards community-based and decentralised training of medical students. AIM: To...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mash, Robert, Pather, Michael, Rhode, Hilary, Fairall, Lara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AOSIS 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5803519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29227134
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v9i1.1602
_version_ 1783298670331953152
author Mash, Robert
Pather, Michael
Rhode, Hilary
Fairall, Lara
author_facet Mash, Robert
Pather, Michael
Rhode, Hilary
Fairall, Lara
author_sort Mash, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: South Africa is committed to health reforms that strengthen primary health care. Preparing future doctors to work in primary care teams with other professionals is a priority, and medical schools have shifted towards community-based and decentralised training of medical students. AIM: To evaluate the effect on student performance of the Practical Approach to Care Kit (PACK) (an integrated decision-making tool for adult primary care) during the final phase of medical student training at Stellenbosch University. SETTING: Clinical rotations in family medicine at clinics in the Western Cape. METHODS: Mixed methods involving a quasi-experimental study and focus group interviews. Student examination performance was compared between groups with and without exposure to the PACK during their clinical training. Student groups exposed to PACK were interviewed at the end of their rotations. RESULTS: Student performance in examinations was significantly better in those exposed to the PACK. Students varied from using the PACK overtly or covertly during the consultation to checking up on decisions made after the consultation. Some felt that the PACK was more suitable for nurses or more junior students. Although tutors openly endorsed PACK, very few modelled the use of PACK in their clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The use of PACK in the final phase of undergraduate medical education improved their performance in primary care. Students might be more accepting and find the tool more useful in the earlier clinical rotations. Supervisors should be trained further in how to incorporate the use of the PACK in their practice and educational conversations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5803519
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher AOSIS
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58035192018-02-12 Evaluating the effect of the Practical Approach to Care Kit on teaching medical students primary care: Quasi-experimental study Mash, Robert Pather, Michael Rhode, Hilary Fairall, Lara Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med Original Research BACKGROUND: South Africa is committed to health reforms that strengthen primary health care. Preparing future doctors to work in primary care teams with other professionals is a priority, and medical schools have shifted towards community-based and decentralised training of medical students. AIM: To evaluate the effect on student performance of the Practical Approach to Care Kit (PACK) (an integrated decision-making tool for adult primary care) during the final phase of medical student training at Stellenbosch University. SETTING: Clinical rotations in family medicine at clinics in the Western Cape. METHODS: Mixed methods involving a quasi-experimental study and focus group interviews. Student examination performance was compared between groups with and without exposure to the PACK during their clinical training. Student groups exposed to PACK were interviewed at the end of their rotations. RESULTS: Student performance in examinations was significantly better in those exposed to the PACK. Students varied from using the PACK overtly or covertly during the consultation to checking up on decisions made after the consultation. Some felt that the PACK was more suitable for nurses or more junior students. Although tutors openly endorsed PACK, very few modelled the use of PACK in their clinical practice. CONCLUSION: The use of PACK in the final phase of undergraduate medical education improved their performance in primary care. Students might be more accepting and find the tool more useful in the earlier clinical rotations. Supervisors should be trained further in how to incorporate the use of the PACK in their practice and educational conversations. AOSIS 2017-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5803519/ /pubmed/29227134 http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v9i1.1602 Text en © 2017. The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Mash, Robert
Pather, Michael
Rhode, Hilary
Fairall, Lara
Evaluating the effect of the Practical Approach to Care Kit on teaching medical students primary care: Quasi-experimental study
title Evaluating the effect of the Practical Approach to Care Kit on teaching medical students primary care: Quasi-experimental study
title_full Evaluating the effect of the Practical Approach to Care Kit on teaching medical students primary care: Quasi-experimental study
title_fullStr Evaluating the effect of the Practical Approach to Care Kit on teaching medical students primary care: Quasi-experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the effect of the Practical Approach to Care Kit on teaching medical students primary care: Quasi-experimental study
title_short Evaluating the effect of the Practical Approach to Care Kit on teaching medical students primary care: Quasi-experimental study
title_sort evaluating the effect of the practical approach to care kit on teaching medical students primary care: quasi-experimental study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5803519/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29227134
http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/phcfm.v9i1.1602
work_keys_str_mv AT mashrobert evaluatingtheeffectofthepracticalapproachtocarekitonteachingmedicalstudentsprimarycarequasiexperimentalstudy
AT pathermichael evaluatingtheeffectofthepracticalapproachtocarekitonteachingmedicalstudentsprimarycarequasiexperimentalstudy
AT rhodehilary evaluatingtheeffectofthepracticalapproachtocarekitonteachingmedicalstudentsprimarycarequasiexperimentalstudy
AT fairalllara evaluatingtheeffectofthepracticalapproachtocarekitonteachingmedicalstudentsprimarycarequasiexperimentalstudy