Cargando…

Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015

BACKGROUND: Although the number of reporting guidelines has grown rapidly, few have gone through an updating process. The STARD statement (Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy), published in 2003 to help improve the transparency and completeness of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies, wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korevaar, Daniël A., Cohen, Jérémie F., Reitsma, Johannes B., Bruns, David E., Gatsonis, Constantine A., Glasziou, Paul P., Irwig, Les, Moher, David, de Vet, Henrica C. W., Altman, Douglas G., Hooft, Lotty, Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5803584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29451535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0014-7
_version_ 1783298683481096192
author Korevaar, Daniël A.
Cohen, Jérémie F.
Reitsma, Johannes B.
Bruns, David E.
Gatsonis, Constantine A.
Glasziou, Paul P.
Irwig, Les
Moher, David
de Vet, Henrica C. W.
Altman, Douglas G.
Hooft, Lotty
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
author_facet Korevaar, Daniël A.
Cohen, Jérémie F.
Reitsma, Johannes B.
Bruns, David E.
Gatsonis, Constantine A.
Glasziou, Paul P.
Irwig, Les
Moher, David
de Vet, Henrica C. W.
Altman, Douglas G.
Hooft, Lotty
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
author_sort Korevaar, Daniël A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the number of reporting guidelines has grown rapidly, few have gone through an updating process. The STARD statement (Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy), published in 2003 to help improve the transparency and completeness of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies, was recently updated in a systematic way. Here, we describe the steps taken and a justification for the changes made. RESULTS: A 4-member Project Team coordinated the updating process; a 14-member Steering Committee was regularly solicited by the Project Team when making critical decisions. First, a review of the literature was performed to identify topics and items potentially relevant to the STARD updating process. After this, the 85 members of the STARD Group were invited to participate in two online surveys to identify items that needed to be modified, removed from, or added to the STARD checklist. Based on the results of the literature review process, 33 items were presented to the STARD Group in the online survey: 25 original items and 8 new items; 73 STARD Group members (86 %) completed the first survey, and 79 STARD Group members (93 %) completed the second survey.Then, an in-person consensus meeting was organized among the members of the Project Team and Steering Committee to develop a consensual draft version of STARD 2015. This version was piloted in three rounds among a total of 32 expert and non-expert users. Piloting mostly led to rewording of items. After this, the update was finalized. The updated STARD 2015 list now consists of 30 items. Compared to the previous version of STARD, three original items were each converted into two new items, four original items were incorporated into other items, and seven new items were added. CONCLUSIONS: After a systematic updating process, STARD 2015 provides an updated list of 30 essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41073-016-0014-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5803584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58035842018-02-15 Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015 Korevaar, Daniël A. Cohen, Jérémie F. Reitsma, Johannes B. Bruns, David E. Gatsonis, Constantine A. Glasziou, Paul P. Irwig, Les Moher, David de Vet, Henrica C. W. Altman, Douglas G. Hooft, Lotty Bossuyt, Patrick M. M. Res Integr Peer Rev Methodology BACKGROUND: Although the number of reporting guidelines has grown rapidly, few have gone through an updating process. The STARD statement (Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy), published in 2003 to help improve the transparency and completeness of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies, was recently updated in a systematic way. Here, we describe the steps taken and a justification for the changes made. RESULTS: A 4-member Project Team coordinated the updating process; a 14-member Steering Committee was regularly solicited by the Project Team when making critical decisions. First, a review of the literature was performed to identify topics and items potentially relevant to the STARD updating process. After this, the 85 members of the STARD Group were invited to participate in two online surveys to identify items that needed to be modified, removed from, or added to the STARD checklist. Based on the results of the literature review process, 33 items were presented to the STARD Group in the online survey: 25 original items and 8 new items; 73 STARD Group members (86 %) completed the first survey, and 79 STARD Group members (93 %) completed the second survey.Then, an in-person consensus meeting was organized among the members of the Project Team and Steering Committee to develop a consensual draft version of STARD 2015. This version was piloted in three rounds among a total of 32 expert and non-expert users. Piloting mostly led to rewording of items. After this, the update was finalized. The updated STARD 2015 list now consists of 30 items. Compared to the previous version of STARD, three original items were each converted into two new items, four original items were incorporated into other items, and seven new items were added. CONCLUSIONS: After a systematic updating process, STARD 2015 provides an updated list of 30 essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41073-016-0014-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5803584/ /pubmed/29451535 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0014-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Korevaar, Daniël A.
Cohen, Jérémie F.
Reitsma, Johannes B.
Bruns, David E.
Gatsonis, Constantine A.
Glasziou, Paul P.
Irwig, Les
Moher, David
de Vet, Henrica C. W.
Altman, Douglas G.
Hooft, Lotty
Bossuyt, Patrick M. M.
Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015
title Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015
title_full Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015
title_fullStr Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015
title_full_unstemmed Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015
title_short Updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of STARD 2015
title_sort updating standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy: the development of stard 2015
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5803584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29451535
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0014-7
work_keys_str_mv AT korevaardaniela updatingstandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracythedevelopmentofstard2015
AT cohenjeremief updatingstandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracythedevelopmentofstard2015
AT reitsmajohannesb updatingstandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracythedevelopmentofstard2015
AT brunsdavide updatingstandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracythedevelopmentofstard2015
AT gatsonisconstantinea updatingstandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracythedevelopmentofstard2015
AT glaszioupaulp updatingstandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracythedevelopmentofstard2015
AT irwigles updatingstandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracythedevelopmentofstard2015
AT moherdavid updatingstandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracythedevelopmentofstard2015
AT devethenricacw updatingstandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracythedevelopmentofstard2015
AT altmandouglasg updatingstandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracythedevelopmentofstard2015
AT hooftlotty updatingstandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracythedevelopmentofstard2015
AT bossuytpatrickmm updatingstandardsforreportingdiagnosticaccuracythedevelopmentofstard2015