Cargando…
‘Are you siding with a personality or the grant proposal?’: observations on how peer review panels function
BACKGROUND: In Australia, the peer review process for competitive funding is usually conducted by a peer review group in conjunction with prior assessment from external assessors. This process is quite mysterious to those outside it. The purpose of this research was to throw light on grant review pa...
Autores principales: | Coveney, John, Herbert, Danielle L, Hill, Kathy, Mow, Karen E, Graves, Nicholas, Barnett, Adrian |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5803633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29451548 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-017-0043-x |
Ejemplares similares
-
Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel
por: Graves, Nicholas, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers
por: Herbert, Danielle L, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
How to write a grant proposal
por: Zlowodzki, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2007) -
The impact of funding deadlines on personal workloads, stress and family relationships: a qualitative study of Australian researchers
por: Herbert, Danielle L, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Streamlined research funding using short proposals and accelerated peer review: an observational study
por: Barnett, Adrian G, et al.
Publicado: (2015)