Cargando…
Biomedical journal speed and efficiency: a cross-sectional pilot survey of author experiences
BACKGROUND: Although the peer review process is believed to ensure scientific rigor, enhance research quality, and improve manuscript clarity, many investigators are concerned that the process is too slow, too expensive, too unreliable, and too static. In this feasibility study, we sought to survey...
Autores principales: | Wallach, Joshua D., Egilman, Alexander C., Gopal, Anand D., Swami, Nishwant, Krumholz, Harlan M., Ross, Joseph S. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5803634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29451557 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-017-0045-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Assessment of Preprint Policies of Top-Ranked Clinical Journals
por: Massey, Dorothy S., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Assessment of Concordance and Discordance Among Clinical Studies Posted as Preprints and Subsequently Published in High-Impact Journals
por: Shi, Xiaoting, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Role of supplementary material in biomedical journal articles: surveys of authors, reviewers and readers
por: Price, Amy, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Perspectives From Authors and Editors in the Biomedical Disciplines on Predatory Journals: Survey Study
por: Cohen, Andrew J, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Adherence to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors’ (ICMJE) prospective registration policy and implications for outcome integrity: a cross-sectional analysis of trials published in high-impact specialty society journals
por: Gopal, Anand D., et al.
Publicado: (2018)